Displaying posts categorized under

POLITICS

Let’s Be Clear, Republicans Would NEVER Get Away With A Shutdown Like This

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/30/lets-be-clear-republicans-would-never-get-away-with-a-shutdown-like-this/

Last November, voters handed control of Congress to Republicans who pledged to cut taxes and spending. In response, Democrats decided to hold the country hostage because they want to borrow and spend $1.5 trillion on illegal immigrants and well-to-do Obamacare enrollees.

That is the simplest and most honest way to describe what has been going on since Oct. 1. But you’d hardly know it, given the way the shutdown is talked about.

The Senate has had a chance 13 times to vote on a “continuing resolution” that would keep the government operating while lawmakers debate future spending bills, including the Democrats’ wish list.

And 13 times, Senate Democrats filibustered the bill because they don’t want a debate. They want a concession.

Yet time after time, Democrats are allowed to go on news programs and spout nonsense about how this is the Republicans’ fault.

Well, try to imagine Republicans doing the same.

Imagine them refusing to keep the government running because, say, they wanted another $1.5 trillion for the Pentagon.

They wouldn’t be able to walk out their front doors without being assaulted by mobs. There would be no media outlet that would let them recite their bogus talking points, because reporters would be furiously interrupting them and calling them liars.

Every front page, every evening newscast, 24 hours a day on cable, would feature stories of the terrible harm being inflicted upon Americans. Every single one of them blaming Republicans for the misery.

There’s Just One Deadly Sin For Today’s Democrats-Crossing the Party Line

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/28/the-democrats-moral-compass-points-nowhere/

It has been somewhat amusing to watch Democrats twist themselves into pretzels to justify their continued support for miscreants and reprobates, while still trying to claim the moral high ground when it comes to President Donald Trump.

In the span of just one week, we’ve seen them rush to defend a Senate candidate, Graham Platner, who didn’t just sport a Nazi tattoo on his chest, but a tattoo of a skull favored by guards at Nazi concentration camps. A guy who spouted anti-gay slurs on social media.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, speaking for all Democrats, washes his hands of it.

“I suspect that Graham Platner is not the only American to have gone through a dark period,” Sanders told Axios. “What he did was he expressed his darkness on the internet. Probably not a brilliant thing to do, alright? And he said things that are stupid, things that were hurtful. He has apologized for them.”

Which led one cowardly Democrat to tell The Hill anonymously that “I do not understand how we can go from having a subset of the party that is obsessed with calling Donald Trump a Nazi to then going to vast lengths to excuse a Nazi tattoo.”

The Platner revelation came just after Democrats felt compelled to stand by Jay Jones, a candidate for Virginia attorney general – the chief law enforcement officer of the state – who fantasized about killing a political opponent and his children, and said he’d be happy to see cops killed.

Not one prominent Democrat called on Jay Jones to leave the race.

Instead, the typical response was what former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney told National Review:

“Obviously, those text messages are indefensible, but I’ve known Jay Jones for a long period of time. He’s a friend. He made a mistake, he apologized, he’s been accountable for that.”

Requiem for the Pro-Israel Democrat How the party of Truman became the party of Mamdani by Daniel J. Samet

https://www.commentary.org/articles/daniel-samet/democrats-break-up-with-israel/

The Democratic Party’s long-running love affair with Israel is over. Like most breakups, this one has turned ugly. The signs are omnipresent.

Washington Democrats are a case in point. Prominent Democratic politicians decry Israel’s supposed sins in Gaza and spare the culprit, Hamas. In 2024, then–Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer literally demanded the removal of Benjamin Netanyahu, the duly elected prime minister of a democratic ally in the grip of an existential war. In July 2025, 27 Democratic senators—a majority of their caucus—voted to withhold military assistance to Israel. Bernie Sanders, who led the legislative charge, bemoaned the fact that “American taxpayer dollars are being used to… support the cruelty of Netanyahu and his criminal ministers.” In August, Minority Whip Katherine Clark (the second-highest-ranking Democrat in the House) said the war in Gaza was a “genocide.”

Democratic politicians at the local level have assumed an even more venomous affect. New York City’s likely next mayor, Zohran Mamdani, refused to denounce the genocidal cry “globalize the intifada” and opposed a day of Holocaust commemoration. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who runs the third-largest city in America, has worn a keffiyeh in public and called Israel’s actions “genocidal.” Staffers for Omar Fateh, who has a good shot at being the next mayor of Minneapolis, applauded the attacks of October 7, 2023.

The anti-Israel animus in the Democratic Party could very well accelerate. Democratic politicians lag behind the party’s grass roots when it comes to the Jewish state. Activists routinely protest Democratic leaders they see as too sympathetic to Israel. The numbers indicate that the rest of the party is with the activists. According to a recent Pew poll, 69 percent of Democrats view Israel unfavorably. That’s an astounding number for a party once admiring of the Jewish state.

“I saw a Palestinian senator, his name is Schumer. He’s a great Palestinian,” President Trump said this summer of the Democratic leader. “He’s become a Palestinian, he has abandoned the Jews.” In the comment was the very Trumpian mélange of overstatement and truth. Schumer, a self-styled shomer, who dubbed himself a “guardian of the people of Israel,” was once a stalwart Zionist voice in Congress. No more.

The pro-Israel Democrat is on his deathbed. And he was, for decades, a fixture of the American political scene. His death came, in the words of Ernest Hemingway, gradually, then suddenly. Democrats were adamant Zionists for decades. In 1991, for instance, 62 percent of Democrats supported Israel. They then grew increasingly critical of Israel before becoming outright hostile. The reason? The Democratic Party has fallen more and more into the thrall of far-left theories holding that Israel is a “settler-colonialist” oppressor deserving of scorn, not succor.

_____________

The Democratic affinity for Israel was on display as early as 1948. Then it was President Harry Truman, a partisan Democrat if there ever was one, who overrode his own Department of State in recognizing the nascent State of Israel just 11 minutes into its life. Truman recognized that the Jewish state would be friendly to America, and he lent U.S. recognition accordingly. Supporting his decision were many rank-and-file Democrats who believed that it was the right thing to do.

Democrats liked much about Israel. They adored its cause. Zionism was about the rebirth of the Jewish people—and the advancement of progressive ideals.

Understanding the Dems’ lackluster response to a possible Israel-Hamas ceasefire By Andrea Widburg

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/10/understanding_the_dems_lackluster_response_to_a_possible_israel_hamas_ceasefire.html

You’d think that the people who have been screaming about an imaginary “genocide” would be over the moon about the war ending.

Why are Democrats and leftists (but I repeat myself) so muted in their response to the proposed Israel-Gaza peace plan? I’m glad you asked.

n October 7, 2023, as many as 6,000 Gazan men breached the Israeli border. Acting as sadistically as possible, they slaughtered 1,195 people and wounded 3,400 others, after which they kidnapped 251 people, whom they used, whether dead or alive, as hostages to prevent Israel from engaging in all-out war against Hamas. Israel immediately bombed known Hamas headquarters, and then began ground operations on October 13, before launching a full invasion on October 27. In other words, Hamas started the war, just as the Japanese did when they bombed Pearl Harbor, and America responded.

One of Hamas’s biggest weapons in the war was propaganda, which created a very peculiar asymmetry. Israel tried desperately to avoid civilian casualties against an army deliberately embedded among civilians. It repeatedly gave up its ability to kill enemy troops by broadcasting its intended targets and urging civilians to flee…which, of course, enabled Hamas fighters to flee, too. It also shipped millions of tons of food to Gaza, which Hamas fighters promptly stole, either for their own use or to sell at a profit to resupply their arms. No military in history has warned its enemies about attacks or fed them, but that’s what Israel did.

Gerrymandering, Race Pandering, and Political Meandering Gerrymandering wars heat up as both parties redraw districts to cement power, with Republicans flipping liberal tactics and Democrats scrambling to keep their edge. By Arthur Schaper

https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/14/gerrymandering-race-pandering-and-political-meandering/

Gerrymandering, the political practice of carving up awkward-looking legislative districts to benefit one party’s political power, has slithered into the public conversation once again.

Some of us remember the history behind this political practice, starting with the governor of Massachusetts, Elbridge Gerry. Democratic-Republicans want to shore up their new power in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Federalist opponents of the maneuver mocked one of the serpentine-like districts created by the party, christening the shape with claws, wings, and a razor-sharp mouth, calling the monstrosity “The Gerrymander.”

Why has the discussion roared into the public consensus this time? It started with the Texas legislature’s efforts to redraw its state’s districts after a request from the Trump Administration to review the fairness of the districts.

Yes, there is gerrymandering in Texas, but not the way that liberal reformers want to portray the problem. Consider some of the urban, Democratic Congressional districts in Texas: the 29th, 32nd, and 33rd, for example, are obscenely drawn. These contortions are examples of race pandering, or “race-mandering,” which result from the tortured misuse of the Voting Rights Act and fears of ongoing legal challenges from left-wing legal activists demanding more majority-minority districts. This kind of lawfare recently forced Alabama and Louisiana to create gerrymandered districts.

Texas is not alone in this fight, either. Ohio has to redraw its Congressional districts. This opportunity could create three more Republican-leaning Congressional seats, while the Texas legislature advances a map creating five more GOP seats. Of course, Governor Abbott and the Republican leadership have floated increasing the GOP advantage to six to eight seats if absent Democrats refuse to come back to work in their vain efforts to break legislative quorums. Democrats have not helped their cause by fleeing to Illinois, whose districts are so gerrymandered that even Stephen Colbert poked fun at them.

Texas Redistricting Breaks The Democratic Party

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/08/08/texas-redistricting-breaks-the-democratic-party/

Consider what has transpired in the past few weeks and ask yourself which political party is acting like petulant children.

Earlier this year, the Justice Department found that four Texas districts drawn in 2021 are “unconstitutionally racially biased” because they violate the equal protection clause and “must be rectified immediately.”

Hans von Spakovsky, an election law expert at the Heritage Foundation, notes that not only did those Texas districts violate the Constitution, but the boundaries they drew in 2021 were based on faulty 2020 Census data, which had missed half a million Texans, and didn’t reflect the influx of 2 million people over the past five years.

So, the state redrew districts to pass constitutional muster and reflect the reality of Texas’ population, which, because it ends up creating more Republican-favored districts, sparked an unhinged national outrage.

Democratic state legislators fled Texas so they could block a vote on the new district boundaries – a flagrant attempt to thwart the democratic process that also violates Texas law.

Democratic leaders around the country lost their collective minds, beclowning themselves and the party they lead in the process.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries promised that “Democrats are going to respond from coast to coast and at all points in between to this effort to steal the midterm elections.” (In 2021, Jeffries called Trump a “pathological liar” a “sociopath” and a “malignant narcissist” for claiming that Democrats stole the 2020 election,)

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker proudly claimed to be providing sanctuary to the runaway Texans, “’cause we know they’re doing the right thing, we know that they’re following the law.”

Pritzker claims to be fighting a valiant battle against “gerrymandering” – in which district lines are drawn purposely to favor one party or another. It’s is an unfortunate reality in politics, one hated by whichever party is on the losing end.

Democrats, Israel, and Trump Derangement Syndrome The left’s hatred of Trump—and now Israel—runs so deep, it’s willing to abandon decades of principle just to spite its enemies. By Stephen Soukup

https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/02/democrats-israel-and-trump-derangement-syndrome/

A long time ago, long before he self-radicalized and became a parody of himself, Peter Beinart was the young liberal who wanted to save liberalism. Beinart was still in his twenties when he took the helm of the flagship journal of progressivism, The New Republic, and began speaking and writing about recreating the positive, muscular, America-loving liberalism of the post-war era. In 2004, Beinart penned a long essay for his magazine titled “A Fighting Faith,” in which he articulated the ideas that would become the foundation of the book, The Good Fight: Why Liberals—and Only Liberals—Can Win the War on Terror and Make America Great Again.

Although most of Beinart’s case—in the article and the book—was based on what he saw as the inherent righteousness of American liberalism, the underlying premise was that “conservative” leaders simply couldn’t win the war. Part of this was a flaw in conservatism itself, its practices and tactics, but another part of it was the belief that the conservative administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney had squandered the world’s good faith and no longer possessed the moral authority necessary to shepherd the West to victory over the forces of radical Islam.

Although Beinart didn’t intend it as such, his case for liberal leadership in the War on Terror became a corollary to Charles Krauthammer’s theory of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.” The late, great Krauthammer described BDS as “the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency—nay—the very existence of George W. Bush,” and used it to explain how otherwise moderate or sane people (usually Democrats) came to detest everything George W. Bush said or did, even if they knew, in their heart of hearts, that he was right. Because BDS was especially prevalent in connection with the War on Terror, Beinart’s theory that only a “liberal” could win that war became something of a truism. The left and the media (I know, I know…) would never allow Bush—or any conservative—to win the war because of their irrational hatred of him (them). As a result, if the war were ever to be won, a liberal would have to do it.

In short, then, the unified Beinart-Krauthammer theory held—accurately and with little credible opposition—that leftist irrationality and hatred of George Bush made the War on Terror essentially unwinnable. The left’s hatred was more powerful than any instinct it might have to do the right thing.

It’s worth keeping all of this in mind today, as the Democratic Party slowly but surely abandons its support for the state of Israel.

More Bad News For Dems — Most Voters Now Call Them ‘Too Radical’: I&I/TIPP Poll Terry Jones

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/07/23/more-bad-news-for-dems-most-voters-now-call-them-too-radical-ii-tipp-poll/

The Democratic Party’s attempt to “resist” President Donald Trump is backfiring, the latest I&I/TIPP poll shows. A plurality of American adults now believe the one-time party of the center has gone too far to the left.

Voters who responded to the online national poll of 1,421 adults, taken from June 25 to June 27, were asked the following question: “Do you think the Democratic Party has become too radical in its views and policies?”

A strong plurality of 45% of all poll respondents said yes, while 36% said no and another 18% said they weren’t sure. The poll’s margin of error is +/-2.7 percentage points.

As would be expected, the question elicited predictable differences among Democrats, Republicans and independent and third-party voters.

Among Democrats, for instance, 64% answered “no,” while 22% said “yes.” Republicans were quite different, as befits the current political schism, with just 16% noes and 73% yesses. Independents were at a 40% plurality for yes, and 33% no, with a hefty 27% not sure.

Democrats’ identity crisis shows no sign of getting better. It’s actually getting worse Democrat-commissioned poll shows party is now viewed as ‘out of touch’ and ‘weak’ among voters in swing counties across battleground states Liz Peek

https://lizpeek.com/news/democrats-identity-crisis-shows-no-sign-of-getting-better-its-actually-getting-worse/?utm_source=newsletter.lizpeek.com&utm_

The Democratic Party has no leader and no message. That’s not a right-wing talking point; that’s the findings of a poll commissioned by a Democrat SuperPAC.

As reported by The Hill, a survey conducted between May and June by Unite the Country showed voters perceive the Democratic Party as “out of touch,” “woke” and “weak.” Worse, perceptions and confidence in the party have actually soured since last year’s election, when Democrats not only lost the presidency, but also the Senate and the House. Democrat support from White men, Hispanic men and working-class voters in general has collapsed to below 35%.

The poll is especially worrisome for Democrats in that it surveyed voters across 21 swing counties in 10 battleground states – the regions which will determine the outcomes of future elections.

What can Democrats do to turn their prospects around? For starters, according to the survey, find new leaders who will talk about issues that matter to people, and particularly economic issues. Also, get back to common sense, which the party has rejected.

Can anyone be surprised by these findings? After all, Democrats with unerring aim find themselves on the wrong side of almost every issue. Biological boys competing in girls’ sports? Check. Open borders? Check. Opposing school choice? Check.

The America Party Will Harm Democrats the Most Who will – and won’t – be enticed by Musk’s new party. by Jeff Crouere

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-america-party-will-harm-democrats-the-most/

It is now official; tech billionaire Elon Musk has formed the America Party. He conducted a poll on X.com asking his followers whether they wanted “independence from the two-party system! Should we create the America Party?”

The post received 83.9 million views and 1.2 million people voted. The results showed that 65.4% of the respondents favored a new party, while 34.6% were opposed.

After announcing the results of his online poll, Musk posted “By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party, and you shall have it. When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.” Musk vowed that his new party would give Americans back “your freedom.”

Musk’s goal with the new party will be limited to certain congressional districts. He said, “One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts. Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.”

If Musk moves beyond trying to elect a few members of Congress to field a presidential candidate in 2028, the odds are stacked against him. The last third-party candidate to win a presidential election was Abraham Lincoln in 1860.

Subsequently, there have been two serious third-party presidential bids. In 1912, Teddy Roosevelt won 27.4% of the vote as a candidate of the Progressive Party. Eighty years later, in 1992, oil businessman Ross Perot won 18.9% of the vote as an independent candidate.