Displaying posts published in

July 2022

Tucker Carlson’s latest on ‘green’ energy is mandatory viewing By Andrea Widburg

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/07/tucker_carlsons_latest_on_green_energy_is_mandatory_viewing.html

When Congress — the people’s representatives — had the chance to vote on the Green New Deal, it emphatically said “no.”  Were we still a functioning representative democracy, that would be the end of the Green New Deal until such time as We the People elect (God forbid) a majority of senators and House members who want that legislation.  The unconstitutional leftist model since FDR, though, has been for the Executive Branch to do what Congress refuses to do, and, sadly, Chief Justice Roberts’s spineless opinion in West Virginia v. EPA has done nothing to limit that lawless power.

We now have a situation in which Biden has unchallenged and outsized executive powers and the EPA has unlimited regulatory power (both of which, I can assure you, were never meant to control America’s entire energy supply).  The result is that the Democrats are relentlessly clamping down on our available energy supplies.

In a pre-modern era, energy came from four sources: primitive wind and water power, animal abuse, and slavery (the last of which was not, although I’m sure leftists will deny it, a uniquely American phenomenon).  In the modern era, fossil fuel has allowed humans to break free from these limited and abusive energy systems.  Farms produce a surplus, water is cleaned, medical care is readily available, homes are warm in the winter and cool in the summer, and so much more.  Rather than listing everything that undergirds our world thanks to fossil fuel, I challenge you to list a single thing in your life that does not rely on fossil fuel for its functionality, manufacture, or transport.

Cataloguing Biden’s Ineptitude On Inflation

https://issuesinsights.com/2022/07/14/cataloguing-bidens-ineptitude-on-inflation/

When the latest government report on inflation came out on Wednesday, showing that it had hit another grim milestone in June of 9.1%, President Joe Biden told the public not to worry.

That figure, he said, “is out of date.” Prices for key components of the Consumer Price Index have eased so far in July, he said. Besides, he said, inflation is higher “in many countries (in Europe) than in America.”

The public would do well to ignore anything Biden says about inflation, given his horrible track record when it comes to this topic. Since prices started their upward climb in March 2021, Biden has by turns claimed that it was the result of a booming economy, that it was temporary, that it was the result of supply chain bottlenecks, and most recently that Vladimir Putin is to blame.

When not making fact-free claims like those, Biden simply lies. Take his oft-repeated claim that Europeans have it far worse on inflation. Even Newsweek magazine felt obliged to conclude in its fact check “that Biden’s statement that U.S. inflation is the ‘lowest of almost every major nation’ is largely inaccurate.”

We don’t expect readers to simply take our word for it that Biden has been out to lunch on inflation. So we assembled a handy chart showing the annualized rate of inflation each month since January 2020. It matches up that record with statements Biden made about inflation.

Joe Biden’s Presidency Is Sinking Responsibility for the public failure of this government lies with the Democratic Party. By Daniel Henninger

https://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-sinking-presidency-nomination-2024-election-harris-policies-inflation-11657743904?mod=opinion_featst_pos1

It’s time to board a sinking ship— Joe Biden’s presidency.

The New York Times reported that its poll with Siena College finds 64% of Democrats, not even waiting for the midterm election results, want their candidate in 2024 to be someone other than the president. That famous Democratic youth vote? Under 30, they’re down on Joe at a 94% rate.

Below this thin ice is the measured sentiment that more than 7 in 10 Americans say the U.S. is headed in the wrong direction.

With the probably pointless caveat that things can change in politics, this means Mr. Biden is effectively a lame-duck president. If he runs, there will be a primary challenge, as there was in 1980 for Jimmy Carter.

Two Democratic governors, California’s Gavin Newsom and Illinois’ J.B. Pritzker, are already circling. RootsAction, a group aligned with Bernie Sanders, is planning a #DontRunJoe campaign. When Mr. Biden visited Cleveland last week to tout his economic accomplishments, the party’s candidate for U.S. Senate, Rep. Tim Ryan, and its candidate for governor, Nan Whaley, said scheduling conflicts prevented them from joining him.

A Revolution Is Coming in Heart-Disease Treatment The increasing availability of outpatient services will lower costs and improve cardiac health. It already happened with cancer. By Bobby Jindal and Neil M. Gheewala

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-revolution-is-coming-to-heart-care-cardiac-hospital-systems-asc-outpatient-market-11657744203?mod=opinion_lead_pos8

A cancer-care revolution that started in the 1980s is spreading to cardiac care. In the 1980s, cancer was treated almost exclusively in hospital settings. These days, more than 80% of all cancer care happens in community outpatient centers, which achieve better outcomes, keep costs low, and offer a more agreeable environment to both patients and caregivers.

Heart disease is poised for a similar revolution, with the potential to have an enormous positive effect on the U.S. healthcare system. Cardiovascular disease already accounts for 1 out of 7 healthcare dollars spent, and the total cost is expected to double and then some, to $1.1 trillion by 2035. Advances in cardiovascular medicine are creating a shift toward preventive care, shorter hospital stays, lower costs and better outcomes.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently approved 14 new reimbursement codes for outpatient ambulatory surgical centers, or ASCs, with more codes likely to be approved in the coming years. The reimbursement rates for these new codes are an average of 50% cheaper for ASCs than they are for hospital outpatient departments. In addition to significant savings for payers, patients will benefit from fewer physician visits, same-day treatments and better outcomes. (We are both board members, and Dr. Gheewala is a staff member, of a company that owns an ASC and has two more under development.)

Medicare has paid hospital outpatient departments nearly twice as much as it pays independent physicians or ASCs for the same services. Even off-campus facilities, which are hospital-owned but otherwise identical to independent physicians, have until recently enjoyed higher rates. Making payments site-neutral and shifting more services to outpatient settings would reduce Medicare spending by more than $150 billion in the next decade. It would reduce beneficiary spending on premiums and cost sharing by more than $90 billion over that time.