Displaying posts published in

July 2012

JAMIE GLAZOV: THE EXPLOITATION OF IMMIGRANT WORKERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST ****

The Exploitation of Immigrant Workers in the Middle East

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glazov/the-exploitation-of-immigrant-workers-in-the-middle-east/print/

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Jay Johnson, a world traveler, a professional in the Health Care business, and a human rights activist. One of his main research fields is the exploitation of immigrant workers in the Middle East – a phenomenon that he has witnessed first-hand in his travels. Visit his website, gcchumanrights.org, which is dedicated to improving working conditions for immigrants and the rights of citizens in general in Gulf Cooperation Council nations.

FP: Jay Johnson, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

I would like to talk to you today about the exploitation of immigrant workers in the Middle East

But first, give us a bit of background about yourself and how you came to be interested in the rights of immigrant workers in the Middle East.

Johnson: Thank you Jamie for the opportunity to be interviewed in Frontpage Magazine.

I am native to Bowling Green, Kentucky, and work as a computer consultant in the Healthcare industry. For several years, I have had the opportunity to visit Europe, the Middle East, and South Asia, including India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.

THE GLAZOV GANG….MUSLIMS STONE CHRISTIANS IN MICHIGAN

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/frontpagemag-com/muslims-stone-christians-in-dearborn-michigan-on-the-glazov-gang-1/

Why Muslims Are Allowed to Stone Christians in America — on The Glazov Gang

On this week’s Glazov Gang, Tom Trento, Dwight Schultz and Josh Brewster gathered to discuss Muslims Stone Christians in Dearborn, Michigan. Below is Part II of a three part series. To watch Part I, click here. We will run Part III in tomorrow’s edition.

You can make sure that Jamie Glazov Productions continues to take you where no other media programs dare to go. Help us by clicking here and making a tax deductible contribution today.

DANIEL GREENFIELD: BLACK ON JEWISH VIOLENCE IN THE U.S.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/daniel-greenfield/black-on-jewish-violence-in-the-u-s-a/print/ On a late June Friday evening, Marc Heinberg, a 61-year old man, was walking home from synagogue along Gravesend Neck Road; Neck Road to the locals. Neck Road is classic Brooklyn; a scattering of modest brick houses along a tree-lined street, but a short walk down “The Neck” takes you to Nostrand Avenue and […]

DANIEL GREENFIELD: THE NATURE OF THE DISEASE ****

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

Cuba, a lovely Communist paradise, which millionaire leftists like Michael Moore and Steven Spielberg have told us has health care vastly superior to our own, is experiencing an outbreak of cholera. There are at least 15 dead and a thousand sick, but the advanced Cuban health care system is on the case. The authorities have banned any mention of “cholera” and doctors are putting down “acute respiratory insufficiency” as the cause of death for the epidemic.
But there’s no need to sneer at Cuba for handling the problem the way that all governments handle problems– by denying that it exists. According to the Cuban government, there is no serious cholera outbreak. According to the European Union, there’s no Eurozone meltdown. According to Obama, the private sector is doing just fine.

Accountability and government bureaucracies don’t go together. When the latter are put in charge of health care, then cholera patients end up doing just as fine as the private sector while the bosses smile and offer themselves another pay raise. That is how euthanasia happens in the UK’s NHS, the envy of six-figure bureaucrats and seven-figure activists on this side of the ocean. Difficult patients are just set aside, denied food and water, and allowed to be just “fine” until they die.

ROBERT SPENCER: MUSLIMS VS. ARCHAEOLOGY

http://pjmedia.com/blog/muslims-vs-archaeology/?print=1 What is it about Islam that leads so many Muslims to see their cultural patrimony as something to be despised and even destroyed? Harking back to the Taliban’s destruction of Afghanistan’s Bamiyan Buddhas in 2001, Muslims in northern Mali last week moved against their own country’s heritage. The Islamic supremacist group Ansar Dine (Defenders […]

RYAN MAURO: THE DEARBORN MOB VIDEO AND NATIONAL SECURITY

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-dearborn-mob-video-and-national-security?f=puball A video of provocative evangelicals being violently attacked by an enraged crowd at the 2012 Dearborn Arab Festival has gone viral, getting about 750,000 hits in one week. The story isn’t just about how the police stood or how the media misreported it. It’s also about a dangerous long-term trend that Europe has woken […]

THE POLITICIZATION OF MILITARY SERVICE: PETER FARMER see note please

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/the-politicization-of-military-service

TOO BAD REP. JOE WALSH WHO IS A SPLENDID MAN IS BAHAVING SO BADLY WITH RESPECT TO HIS OPPONENT…..RSK

Americans have traditionally respected military service, and have over the years chosen many veterans as political leaders. George Washington had been a general in the Continental Army. Teddy Roosevelt rode up San Juan Hill and into the White House. Harry Truman was an artillery officer in WWI. Dwight Eisenhower was a renowned general and theater commander during WWII. John Kennedy was famed for his service aboard the PT-109. There are many other examples.Aspiring politicians have long-known and exploited the link between military service and electability. Military experience is usually an asset with voters, provided the candidate in question handles his service tastefully and in a manner that is not overtly manipulative. Then-Senator John Kennedy ran successfully for the White House in 1960 partly on the strength of his wartime service in the U.S. Navy aboard the now-famous PT-109. His opponent, Richard Nixon, had also served in the U.S.N. during WWII and military service – or lack of it – did not become a major issue during the campaign.

Conversely, an obviously-staged photo of Democrat presidential candidate Michael Dukakis (a U.S. Army veteran) posed in an M1 Abrams tank in September, 1988 – may have cost him the election that fall. Rightly or wrongly, “Dukakis in a tank” has since entered the public relations lexicon as shorthand for a mishandled photo op.

Who can forget John Kerry’s appearance at the Democratic National Convention in 2004, sporting the very same medals he allegedly had thrown away in disgust thirty years earlier over the Vietnam War? Candidate Kerry accepted the Democrat Party nomination with a salute and the words “Reporting for duty” – but the voters didn’t buy it. He lost to George W. Bush.

These and other episodes come to mind in the wake of the tawdry and unseeming dust-up between incumbent Congressman Joe Walsh (R-IL, 8th District) and Democrat Tammy Duckworth, who will oppose him in the fall election.

Duckworth, an army officer and helicopter pilot, lost both of her legs in action in Iraq in 2004, when an RPG hit her UH-60 “Blackhawk” helicopter. Walsh, who is not a veteran, has accused Duckworth of exploiting her military service for political gain. Said Walsh, “Now I’m running against a woman who, I mean– my God– that’s all she talks about,” Walsh told an audience in Elk Grove, Ill. “Our true heroes, the men and women who served us, it’s the last thing in the world they talk about.” Duckworth campaign manager Kaitlin Fahey fired back in a July 3rd statement, “Congressman Walsh’s comments insult those who sacrificed to make this country free.” Duckworth herself, appearing on MSNBC’s “Hardball” in an interview with Michael Smerconish, said that “that she never claimed to be a hero” and that Walsh’s charges were “irresponsible.”

OLMERTA IN ISRAEL….POP GOES THE WEASEL

http://news.yahoo.com/ex-israeli-pm-olmert-cleared-corruption-case-092442556.html JERUSALEM (AP) — An Israeli court cleared former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on Tuesday of the central charges in a multi-case corruption trial that forced him from power, but convicted him of a lesser charge of breach of trust.The verdict was seen as a major victory for Olmert, who stepped down as prime minister […]

ELECTIONS ARE COMING: BIG DUST-UP IN NEVADA….BEN SHAPIRO SEE NOTE PLEASE

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/09/House-ethics-committee-Shelley-Berkley
I’M HAPPY FOR A VICTORY IN NEVADA…BUT HOW COME CHARLIE RANGEL AND MAXINE WATERS GET A PASS AND THIS LADY DOES NOT?…..RSK
In a stunning blow to the Senatorial hopes of Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-NV), the House Ethics Committee today unanimously voted to open an investigative subcommittee into conflict of interest charges stemming from her alleged attempts to direct cash toward the kidney health care industry – and, in particular, toward her husband, who runs the Kidney Specialists of Southern Nevada. Breitbart News led the charge in demanding investigation into Berkley’s activities.

The House Ethics Committee, chaired by Rep. Jo Bonner (R-AL) and ranking member Rep. Linda T. Chavez (D-CA), released the following statement:

In accordance with Clause 3 of House Rule XI and Committee Rules 14(a)(3) and 18, the Committee on Ethics (the Committee) unanimously voted on June 29, 2012, to establish an investigative subcommittee. Pursuant to the Committee’s action, the investigative subcommittee shall have jurisdiction to determine whether Representative Shelley Berkley violated the Code of Official Conduct or any law, rule, regulation, or other applicable standard of conduct in the performance of her duties or the discharge of her responsibilities, with respect to alleged communications and activities with or on behalf of entities in which Representative Berkley’s husband had a financial interest.

WES PRUDEN:…WE’RE ALL TERRORISTS NOW

http://www.prudenpolitics.com/newsletter?utm_source=P&P%20Auto%201&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=4004

Barack Obama, the Chicago messiah who promised to unite a fragmented nation, is succeeding beyond his dreams, and maybe even the dreams of his father, which he wrote about so eloquently in his campaign autobiography.
We’re all terrorists now.

The Department of Homeland Security, ever on the scout for opportunities to blow taxpayer money, commissioned one of those “studies” so popular among college professors, to find clues that would identify prospective terrorists before they blow up airplanes, bring down skyscrapers and otherwise wreak havoc.The “new studies” show that just about everybody must be dreaming of terrorism, plotting mayhem and chaos and teaching others how to do it.

Something called the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (learned professors dream of being paid by the word) went to work at the University of Maryland and produced a $12 million magnum opus called “Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States, 1970-2008.” And not a moment too soon.

Islamic terrorism, the scourge of the civilized world, like bubonic plague in an earlier time, largely gets a pass; the study does not even mention the first attempt to bring down the World Trade Center in 1993 in the name of Allah. But the professors have got the number of the rest of us.