RUTHFULLY YOURS

https://amgreatness.com/2025/04/24/what-is-democratic-legality/

Since 2021, the left has waged a veritable war against the American legal system in a variety of ways.

One serial target of Democrats and the Left has been the Supreme Court.

In 2020, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) spoke to an angry throng of pro-abortion protestors assembled at the very doors of the court chambers.

He threatened two of the justices, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, by name. Schumer yelled to the volatile crowd that the justices’ views would make them “reap the whirlwind,” and the two would not know what “hit” them.

In the ensuing months, protestors mobbed some of the conservative justices’ homes—likely committing felonies. The sympathetic Biden Justice Department chose not to follow the law, and so did nothing—although eventually a would-be assassin turned up.

Joe Biden himself bragged that he would try to ignore the Supreme Court ruling banning his arbitrary cancellation of billions of dollars in student loans. Indeed, he boasted, “The Supreme Court blocked it, but that didn’t stop me.”

In response, no one on the left ever complained about endangering the “rule of law” or Biden as “a dictator.”

For three years, four local, state, and federal prosecutors warped the law to neuter Donald Trump. Most of the charges had never been brought against other political figures in similar circumstances.

The vast majority of the 93 weaponized indictments backfired on the liberal prosecutors, who had contorted the legal system for political purposes and now face their own ethical or legal quagmires.

The federal prosecutor Jack Smith belatedly reported accepting $140,000 in free legal services.

Georgia prosecutor Fani Willis was removed from the Trump case and fined, and is now under further investigation.

New York prosecutor Letitia James is now facing allegations of falsification of documents and loan fraud.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/a-field-guide-to-the-american-left/

The Democrats have responded to their repudiation by the voters by tripling down on the toxic ideas and preposterous policies that make sense only when one remembers that, as DOGE has exposed, in the end, they are patent grifts, opportunities for enriching themselves and their plutocratic, corporate globalist co-grifters.

On one hand, this state of affairs makes for great comedy enlivened by 100-proof schadenfreude. But we should remember that as British PM Harold MacMillan famously said, “events” are the most frightening thing in politics. The unforeseen, the unpredictable, the astonishing anomaly, all are most powerful in representative governments with regularly scheduled elections that invite the voters to ask, whether fairly or not, those in power, “What have you done for us lately?”

Despite having twice been victims of that biennial habit of our democratic republic, the Dems seem to keep deepening the hole they’ve been digging for decades, mostly by endorsing various iterations of Marxism, and abandoning the Constitution––but also by willful blindness to the voters’ anger over their policies that defy not just the Constitution, but also morality, virtue, common sense, and the science they arrogantly claim as their guide.

Typical of the Dems’ willful blindness is their attacks on the Republicans’ attempts to stop the blatant corruption of our elections by passing the proposed Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility Act.

As Joe Concha recently pointed out, on this issue the contrast between the majority of voters, who are concerned about electoral integrity, and the Dems’ left-wing caucus, was one of the issues that cost them the election last November. Yet “208 Democrat Congressmen,” Concha reports, voted against “a bill aimed at preventing those who entered the country illegally from voting,” and 47 Senators for now are also lined up to vote against it. “And since 60 votes are needed for cloture,” Concha reminds us, “that means this is dead on arrival.”

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/04/parental_rights_at_risk_from_tyrannical_state_overreach.html

Last month, one-month-old Roxana was wrested at gunpoint from her mother Emily Yazdani’s breast by police and Child Protective Services (CPS) of Loudon County, Virginia. CPS placed the infant in a “foster to adopt” program before being returned to her parents after eight days. A few vigilant websites reported it, but mainstream media ignored this heartless snatching.

What did her parents do to warrant such an intervention? Nothing, says Roxana’s father Farzin Yazdani, an engineer and Navy veteran. CPS was acting on a false allegation of abuse filed by his ex-wife, with whom he is involved in a custody dispute over their five-year-old son. Her previous allegations that Yazdani was abusing their son had also resulted in separations that were later overturned.

While taking Roxana away, armed deputies said they were there “only to enforce.” But there was no warrant nor any specific charges—only CPS and police violating parental rights and riding roughshod over constitution-guaranteed due process. In actions faced by the Yazdanis, police withheld bodycam footage, and CPS rejected FOIA requests for its records.

Eventually, the abuse charges against Yazdani were dismissed. But despite no criminal record, he was handcuffed on one occasion, and, on another, watched helplessly as Roxana was torn from his wife. In a heartrending April 5 post on X, Yazdani called these actions “terror,” “psychological warfare,” and “government-sponsored child abuse.”