‘Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Pastor, Martyr, Prophet, Spy’ By Susan Quinn

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/07/dietrich_bonhoeffer_pastor_martyr_prophet_spy.html

For a very long time, I have heard of the man named Dietrich Bonhoeffer. I recognized him as someone who wanted to save the Jews from Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Recently, I saw a movie about him, and was inspired to learn more about him. Coincidentally a friend told me that Eric Metaxas had written a book about Bonhoeffer, and I felt compelled to read it.

I was impressed and deeply moved.

Like so many brilliant men, Bonhoeffer was complicated. And yet he demonstrated so much clarity in his ideas and beliefs that he left no doubt about his relationship to the Church and his abhorrence of the Nazis. He grew up in a family that was not deeply religious, although Christian, but eventually he saw his own destiny emerge:

It wasn’t until 1920, when Dietrich turned fourteen, that he was ready to tell anyone he had decided to become a theologian. It took a bold and courageous person to announce such a thing in the Bonhoeffer family.

Although his family was taken aback at his decision so early in his life, over time they grew to fully support him in his academic and religious pursuits.

In this review, I don’t plan to review the details of his maturation. Suffice it to say that he saw the dangers well in advance of the Nazi rule, and acted accordingly:

When the Nazis were taking over the German Lutheran Church, he would lead the charge to break away and start the Confessing Church. [The church] must completely separate herself from the state. . . It wouldn’t be long before the people return because they must have something. They would have rediscovered their need for piety.

Bonhoeffer was well aware of the violations against both the Church and the people who the Nazis would target. He realized early in his career that the Jews were going to be in Hitler’s sights, and he rejected the dictator’s decisions:

The Bonhoeffers learned that something especially disturbing called the Aryan Paragraph would take effect April 7 [1933]. It would result in a series of far-reaching laws that were cynically announced as the ‘Restoration of the Civil Service.’ Government employees must be of ‘Aryan’ stock; anyone of Jewish descent would lose his job. If the German church, essentially a state church, went along, all pastors with Jewish blood would be excluded from ministry. But perhaps the most grievous aspect of the church turmoil was the willingness of mainstream Protestant Christian leaders to consider adopting the Aryan Paragraph.

The German Christians, which Bonhoeffer refused to support, had allied themselves with the State and supported its perverse views:

In her book, Twisted Cross: The German Christian Movement in the Third Reich, Doris Bergen wrote that ‘the ‘German Christians’ preached Christianity as the polar opposite of Judaism, Jesus as the arch anti-semite, and the cross as the symbol of war against Jews.’ To make Christianity one with Germanness meant purging it of everything Jewish. One of the leaders, Georg Schneider, called the whole Old Testament ‘a cunning Jewish conspiracy.’

The Democrats’ phoney populism is fooling no one Zohran Mamdani’s blend of wokeness and welfarism won’t win the working class back from Trump. Sean Collins U.S. Correspondent

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/07/10/the-democrats-phoney-populism-is-fooling-no-one/

It’s no secret that the Democrats have long been losing the support of the working class to Donald Trump and the Republicans. To counter Trump’s populist appeal, voices within the Democrats say they need to offer their own version – namely, an ‘economic populism’ aimed at working people.

Those Democrats are all pointing to Zohran Mamdani’s victory earlier this month in the New York City mayoral primary – a win that puts him in prime position to become the next mayor in November’s election. Mamdani’s campaign brought economics to the forefront, prioritising issues around affordability. He offered radical-sounding answers to cost-of-living concerns, including free bus rides, rent controls, childcare and government-run grocery stores. At the same time, he sought to downplay his woke cultural views on race, gender and Israel.

Will Mamdani’s brand of economic populism succeed in bringing back the working class to the Democrats? In a word, no. For one thing, Mamdani, who claimed to speak for poor and working-class New Yorkers, failed to win much support from those very voters in his primary. Mamdani’s opponent, former governor of New York state Andrew Cuomo, beat him by 19 points with those earning under $50,000 annually. Cuomo also won over NYC’s predominantly black neighbourhoods. In contrast, Mamdani’s support was strongest among higher earners and those with a university degree, especially the white millennials of Brooklyn and Queens. Far from reversing Trump’s gains among workers, Mamdani reinforced the Democrats’ position as the party of the university-educated elite.

There are two main reasons why the Democrats’ push on economic populism won’t work. One, because their version of economic ‘populism’ isn’t actually popular with workers. Two, because a focus on economics won’t overcome the Democrats’ association with the woke cultural views that most Americans reject.

Mamdani’s ‘socialist’ economic policies essentially amount to welfarism and redistribution: offering more generous state-provided resources, to be paid for by higher taxes on the wealthy. Apparently, he believes the wealthy are incapable of moving out of New York, and so will provide an endless source of tax revenue.

Shai Davidai, outspoken Israeli professor at Columbia, leaves the university Controversial advocate for pro-Israel Jewish students says he is departing voluntarily as school closes investigation against him, plans to continue his activism from New York by Luke Tress

https://www.timesofisrael.com/shai-davidai-outspoken-israeli-professor-at-columbia-leaves-the-university/

Shai Davidai, an outspoken Israeli professor at New York City’s Columbia University, said on Wednesday that he was leaving the school and that a Columbia investigation against him had been closed.

Davidai became a prominent and controversial advocate for pro-Israel and Jewish students soon after the October 2023 invasion of Israel, and often clashed with the administration, as the campus was roiled by raucous anti-Israel protests.

Davidai told The Times of Israel that he left Columbia voluntarily.

“I’ve lost all trust in the institution and respect for my colleagues,” Davidai said.

“I feel like it’s a place that is unwilling to change on its own. It’s only doing things when forced by the government or forced by money,” he said. “That’s not a place where I think anyone would want their name to be associated with.”

Earlier Wednesday, Davidai shared a letter from the university saying that an investigation against him was closed without finding any wrongdoing or taking any disciplinary action against him.

The university opened the investigation last year. It was carried out by Columbia’s Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action, which responded to allegations of harassment and discrimination on campus. The office was later replaced by the Office of Institutional Equity, which sent Wednesday’s letter to Davidai, according to a screenshot he shared online.

Davidai said there were aspects of his departure he could not discuss for legal reasons, but that he had told the university, “There is no way that I’ll ever leave before they find me innocent.”

Trump’s Cabinet Meeting a Tour de Force, Ignored by Mainstream Media by Liz Peek

https://lizpeek.com/daily-rant/trumps-cabinet-meeting-a-tour-de-force-ignored-by-mainstream-media/?utm_source=newsletter.lizpeek.com&utm_

The Democrat-friendly media mostly ignored yesterday’s cabinet meeting hosted by President Trump, and who can blame them? Comparisons with similar gatherings held by his incapable predecessor Joe Biden do not help their cause. After an hour and a half of newsworthy updates on the activities of this energized and aligned White House, the media focused on one question – about Jeffrey Epstein.

There is ongoing rumor-mongering about possible links between Trump and Epstein, even though the most widely-reported political connection is with Bill Clinton. Can you imagine that political opponents who were willing to fabricate the Steele Dossier to discredit Trump would blanche at exposing his ties to the dreadful Epstein? Good grief. Trump is tired of the inquiries, and said so. Enough!

Of course, Biden barely met with his cabinet, either as a group or, according to reporting in The Original Sin, even individually. During his four years in office, Joe Biden held 9 cabinet meetings; in his first term, President Trump hosted 25. Six months into his second term, he has already held 6.

Not only does Trump invite the press in for a photo op, which presidents typically do, but he also takes – and encourages his cabinet members to take — questions from the press. You would think the press corps would appreciate being given this kind of access, after four years of being iced out by the clandestine Biden team. (No, I know better.)

Those Marxist Democrats The party on the left is leaving the American political spectrum.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/07/10/those-marxist-democrats/

They are amateur Marxists who live like barons  untouched by the depredations of real communists….rsk
What will the Democratic Party’s 2028 platform look like? The way things are going, no one should be surprised if it looks like a manifesto written by a couple of bitter, revolutionary 19th century Germans.

Marxism is no longer on the Democratic Party fringe. It is taking it over.

We see this in the unpleasantness of Zohran Mamdani, the recent winner of the New York City mayoral primary.

The callow Mamdani describes himself as a “Democratic Socialist.” Fact-checkers, who seem to never fact check the incessant claims by the media and Democratic politicians and operatives that President Donald Trump and other Republicans are fascists, say he’s no communist.

While he might not be a card-carrying member of the Communist Party, several of his known positions are inarguably in line with Marxism.

Like Karl Marx, the privileged Mamdani, who calls himself a “BMW Bolshevik,” sees the world through the lens of class struggle. The platform of the Democratic Socialists of America, of which he is a member, “fights” for “the abolition of capitalism” as well as the “social ownership of all major industry and infrastructure,” two Marxist principles that Mamdani supports.

Mamdani is also promising “free stuff” for New Yorkers, from bus trips to child care; proposes to freeze rents (to stick it to those greedy capitalist landlords, no doubt); wishes to “shift the tax burden … to more expensive homes in richer and whiter neighborhoods“; and says there should be no billionaires, though he hasn’t said what he’d do with the 123 who live New York City.

There has been some light pushback from within the party. A few Jewish Democrats in Congress have been “raising concerns about” him, says The Hill. But many in the party are aligning themselves with Mamdani, even Bill Clinton, whose “third way” policies melded ideas from both the left and right, and by today’s standards was an ultra-conservative Democrat.

Attack on London A Netflix documentary marks the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 atrocity. by Mark Tapson

https://www.frontpagemag.com/attack-on-london/

To mark the 20th anniversary this past week of the devastating July 7 Islamist bombings in London, Netflix has released Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers, a four-part documentary series directed by Liza Williams. This compelling and meticulously crafted series revisits the terror attacks that killed 52 people and injured over 700, while also chronicling the intense police investigation that followed. Through survivor testimonies, previously unreleased footage, and interviews with key figures, including former MI5 Director General Eliza Manningham-Buller and former Prime Minister Tony Blair, Attack on London serves up a gripping reconstruction of the events and their aftermath.

However, while the series excels in its storytelling and historical detail, it treads too carefully around the broader societal implications of the attacks, particularly regarding the ideology that drove them and the divisive impact of mass Muslim immigration on the tiny United Kingdom. This caution, reflective of today’s Islamophilic sensibilities of Britain’s political elites, underscores a dangerous reality: the memory and meaning of the 7/7 bombings are being dishonored by the official suppression of any criticism of Islam, which is smeared as “Islamophobic.”

The series opens with a chilling account from survivor Dan Biddle, who describes locking eyes with one of the bombers, Mohammad Sidique Khan, moments before the latter set off the explosion on the Circle Line. Biddle’s harrowing description of the chaos—limbs severed, darkness enveloping the carriage—sets the tone for the documentary’s unflinching portrayal of the human cost. Biddle himself suffered the loss of his legs, which makes for a breath-catching reveal in the documentary.

The Roots of Leftist Rage Unmoored from power and panicked by Trump’s momentum, the left lashes out—from Congress to campus to the street—with rage born of fear and fading influence. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/07/10/the-roots-of-leftist-rage/

Across the political left, from orthodox Democrats to Antifa in the streets, the opposition to Trump has lost its collective mind.

The House minority leader and now self-styled tough guy, Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, poses with a baseball bat to show how dangerous he is in opposing Trump’s budget bill.

Jeffries harangued Congress for eight hours; Sen. Cory Booker went on for 25—both to no effect.

Bernie Sanders and AOC hit the rally trail in private jets to rail about oligarchs, omitting that the ultra-rich are not only mostly leftists but also the funders of the Democratic Party.

Sometimes the Democrats in Congress make bizarre videos, featuring profanity like f**k or s**t. On other occasions, they scream and interrupt Congress.

Some representatives now confess that they’re being pressured by their constituents to take a bullet for the cause.

The racialist Rep. Jasmine Crockett—sometimes playing the prep-school prima donna, sometimes modulating her accent to pass as the authentic inner-city activist—gains headlines for monotonously ranting about old white men.

On left-wing social media, the assassin Luigi Mangione remains a heartthrob for murdering a health-care executive, replacing the Tsarnaev brothers as the hot new left-wing killer.

He, too, might soon end up with a cover photo on Rolling Stone.

The left-wing internet mob grotesquely claims that children lost to the recent flash flood in Texas deserved their fate.

They even advance three sick reasons for their ghoulishness. Texas Christians supported the MAGA agenda and thus met a just fate. Or, as red-state Texans, they were deservedly collateral damage to DOGE’s bureaucratic reductions. Or, as climate denialists would say, the flash flood took righteous revenge on children for their supposed ignorance.

Add it all up, and there is a sizable leftist “base” that is completely amoral.

Muslim Leaders Who Oppose Terrorism: The New Heroes by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21735/muslim-leaders-who-oppose-terrorism

“You [Israelis] represent the world of brotherhood, the world of humanity, their world of affection, the world of democracy, the world of freedom.” — Hassen Chalghoumi, imam from France and head of the visiting delegation, at a meeting with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, July 7, 2025.

When Muslims say they support the Palestinian “resistance,” they are actually voicing support for terrorism and Hamas’s October 7 atrocities against Israelis and others.

Undoubtedly, there are some Muslims who are in favor of these kinds of visits and interfaith dialogue, but they either prefer to remain neutral or are afraid to voice their opinions in public. Muslims should applaud, not condemn, Muslim leaders who reach out to Israel and Jews and speak out against Islamist terror groups, for their own future: they can choose, instead of a life of fear a life of freedom, prosperity and opportunity.

A group of brave Islamic religious leaders from France, Belgium, The Netherlands, Italy and Britain who are visiting Israel this week are being condemned and ridiculed by many Muslims. The leaders are being accused of “treason” and promoting “normalization” with Israel.

The Muslim leaders did not come to Israel to stand against Muslims or the Palestinians. Rather, they came with a message of peace, coexistence and tolerance. They came to Israel out of a belief that interfaith dialogue between Muslims and non-Muslims is imperative. Interfaith dialogue, which promotes peace and harmony, is important because it allows people to learn about different religions and cultures, and to appreciate the similarities and differences between them.

These Islamic leaders are heroes because they chose to visit Israel at a time when many Muslims, especially those living in Europe, are waging a massive smear campaign against Israel because of its war against the Iran-backed Hamas Islamist terror group in the Gaza Strip. Muslims who care about their religion should stand up against Islamist terrorists who have hijacked their religion and are committing atrocities in the name of Islam.

Elon Musk’s party for oligarchs The America Party is a cult of no personality that has nothing to offer to voters. Joel Kotkin

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/07/08/elon-musks-party-for-oligarchs/

Just what America doesn’t need – another party dominated, and this time even started, by oligarchs. SpaceX owner Elon Musk may be able to design rocket ships, but his understanding of politics and public opinion is below elementary-school level. His plan to launch a new party, the America Party, seems largely delusional.

Musk had been teasing the idea of a new, third party for several weeks, following his spectacular falling out with US president Donald Trump. Musk, who had previously led the White House’s efforts to cut public spending at the Department for Government Efficiency (DOGE), was dismayed to learn of Trump’s plans to massively boost spending in his flagship One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Last weekend, Musk announced the creation of the America Party, which he claims will be able to defeat the Republican-Democrat duopoly and represent the ‘80 per cent’ of Americans ‘in the middle’. Billionaire Mark Cuban and financier Anthony Scaramucci have offered to help get the party going.

Musk may be the most successful entrepreneur of his generation, but he is not remotely popular, with 55 per cent of Americans disapproving of him. Nor is the idea of oligarchs funding political parties well received. According to Pew Research, 80 per cent of Americans believe wealthy donors have too much power – and they are right. In 2024, election spending in real dollars is estimated to have been two to three times higher than two decades ago. Some 40 per cent of all political contributions, according to Jacobin, come from the wealthiest one per cent.

The US Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, which essentially prevented any real restraints from being placed on campaign spending, accelerated this pattern. This is hardly just a Republican gambit. Until recently at least, the main beneficiaries of so-called dark money have been Democrats, getting big paydays from backers like Microsoft’s Bill Gates, LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff. These donors helped Kamala Harris raise well over $1.5 billion – the highest figure in history – for her losing presidential campaign.

Americans once admired the tech oligarchs but increasingly find them objectionable and scary. Between 2018 and 2021, Facebook, Amazon and Google all suffered a large-scale loss of confidence. They are now even more unpopular than the hated mainstream media.

Let’s face it. These guys are not upstarts anymore, but increasingly monopolists. Google and Apple account for nearly 90 per cent of all mobile-browser use worldwide, while Microsoft, Android (Google) and iOS (Apple) hold roughly the same share of all operating-system software. Like Wall Street bankers, their power epitomises the relentless concentration of the economy that many Americans instinctively fear.

The Shadowy Past of the Secret Bank That Controls the World By Janet Levy

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/07/the_shadowy_past_of_the_secret_bank_that_controls_the_world.html

Few people—even diligent media followers—are likely to speak knowledgably about the Bank of International Settlements (BIS). Yet, hidden in plain sight in a 20-story tower (with four more stories below ground level) in Basel, the BIS influences the leaders of the world’s top central banks and controls the global economy. Moreover, it cannot be questioned or held accountable for any of its actions. In his 2013 book Tower of Basel, Adam LeBor, a former reporter for The Economist and author of thoroughly researched works like Hitler’s Secret Bankers, The Last Days of Budapest, and City of Oranges, analyzes the bank’s history to explain how it gained unlimited power.

He also exposes its complete amorality. Thomas McKittrick, the bank’s chief during the war, whom the author calls “Hitler’s American Banker,” kept passing critical information to the Nazi regime. The BIS financed the Holocaust by accepting gold stolen by the Nazis from Belgium and marking it as German, even though a Belgian central banker warned that the gold had probably been melted down and re-stamped with German markings.

Austrian and Czech gold was also accepted as German deposits and kept out of reach. It was common knowledge that, besides gold from the governments of occupied nations, the Nazis were depositing gold stolen by the Devisenschutzkommando (DSK), Hitler’s special squads of treasure-hunting torturers. But that did not matter to the BIS. Kapital über alles, as LeBor titles the first part of the book.

Hunger for profit and disregard for ethics—these seem to be ingrained in the very DNA of the BIS. As recently as 1991, when the Argentinian economy collapsed and the country was $81 billion in debt, the BIS accepted—and thus kept out of creditors’ reach—money that should have rightfully been returned to them. Besides two fund management firms, the creditors were mostly pensioners who had invested in Argentinian bonds. The firms have sued the BIS and brought some attention to its highhandedness.