The shameful silence over the slaughter of Nigeria’s Christians While the media obsesses over Israel, Nigerian Islamists continue their years-long killing spree. Sean Nelson

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/08/the-shameful-silence-over-the-slaughter-of-nigerias-christians/

Towards the end of September, comedian Bill Maher provoked social-media outrage by asking a simple question: why does the coverage of Gaza get so much mainstream-media attention when the persecution of Christians in Nigeria gets almost none?

‘They are systematically killing the Christians in Nigeria’, he said on his talk show, Real Time:

‘They’ve killed over 100,000 since 2009. They’ve burned 18,000 churches… These are the Islamists, Boko Haram. This is so much more of a genocide attempt than what is going on in Gaza. They are literally attempting to wipe out the Christian population of an entire country.’

You wouldn’t think of someone like Maher – a self-described ‘apatheist’ (‘I don’t know what happens when you die, and I don’t care’) – as suddenly becoming the most prominent voice on the persecution of Christians in Nigeria. But he’s absolutely right. They are being slaughtered en masse.

So far this year, over 7,000 Christians have been targeted and killed for their faith. Thousands were also killed the year before, and thousands in the year before that. Sometimes hundreds are murdered at once, as in the town of Yelewat in June, or in the village of Zikke in April. Holy days are preferred for big attacks, as in the Christmas massacre of 2023, when pastors were beheaded and churches burned down in Plateau State, or the attack on St Francis Xavier Church, in the town of Owo on Pentecost Sunday 2022.

Attackers can be terrorist groups like Boko Haram and the West African branch of Islamic State, or more amorphous groups like the Fulani herder militants. Christians are also abducted and forced into marriages throughout the country, but especially in Nigeria’s northern states. The intent is to kill or displace Christians in large numbers and take greater control of their ancestral lands.

Of course, this is not to say that all mass violence in Nigeria is religiously motivated. It isn’t. Many Muslims, especially those who resist the Islamists, are also attacked in horrific episodes, like the mosque attack in Katsina State in August.

But the scale of the deliberate attacks on Christians is impossible to deny. The states with the most violence against Christians are within Nigeria’s so-called Middle Belt, which borders the Sharia states in Nigeria’s north. Every week brings new and terrible stories of death. But the official line is to deny the existence of any religious persecution.

Such denials fly in the face of reality. Christians are only a minority in northern Nigeria, but they are five-to-eight times more likely to be killed by jihadists than Muslims. Many northern states also have Sharia criminal laws that mandate the death penalty for alleged blasphemy, such as Kano state, where Sufi musician Yahaya Sharif-Aminu has been facing death row since 2020. Sharif-Aminu is only still alive because he has been able to appeal this medieval decision, but others, like university student Deborah Yakubu, have been less fortunate. In May 2022, Yakubu was stoned to death in Sokoto state because she was overheard thanking Jesus after an exam. Mob attacks against so-called blasphemers usually go unpunished.

Wash, rinse, repeat. Never Forget! Never Again! We forgot and it is again. Diane Bederman

https://dianebederman.com/wash-rinse-repeat-never-forget-never-again-we-forgot-and-it-is-again/

We, the Jews, taught to question, must come together to answer the question of Israel. I have been reading “To Win or Die A Personal Portrait of Menachem Begin” by Ned Temko, and I see, perhaps am reminded, that we, the Jews, are not as one when we answer that most important question.

One would have thought that October 7 would have brought ALL Jews together: left/right; Israel/Diaspora. But it didn’t. We have been at odds since forever.

Following the brutal attack on Israel, CIJA gave us this piece of wisdom.

Our Love is Greater Than Their Hate.

Really? That’s the answer? The barbaric Muslims will just stop murdering Jews if we love them enough despite the fact that their god, Allah, calls on them to kill all the Jews, everywhere.

Or how about “Live and let live.” Muslims do not assimilate, acculturate or accommodate. They just dominate wherever they live.

The third day of the month of Tishrei ( September/October)commemorates the murder of the Jewish Governor of Jerusalem, Gedalyah Ben Achikam, by another Jew, Yishmael Ben Netanyah (586 BCE).

This is why we fast on Tzom Gedaliah (the fast of Gedaliah) on the day after Rosh Hashanah. It’s not just mourning for one man, however righteous. And it’s not only mourning a missed opportunity—a chance to maintain some Jewish foothold in the land. It is grief over internal betrayal and division at the very moment when unity was most desperately needed. The fast reminds us of a bitter truth: sometimes our greatest enemies aren’t the foreign armies at our gates, but the divisions and hatred within our own ranks.  Gedaliah set up his administration in Mizpah, just north of Jerusalem. He encouraged the scattered survivors to return and rebuild. “Do not be afraid to serve the Babylonians,” he urged them. “Settle in the land and serve the king of Babylon, and it will go well with you” (Jeremiah 40:9). Under his leadership, there was a brief renaissance. People began to cultivate the land again, gathering wine and summer fruit in abundance, and those who had fled to neighboring lands returned.

Heather Mac Donald For European Elites, It’s Still “See No Islamist Evil” While demonstrators in London celebrated the terrorist attack on a Manchester synagogue, national leaders warn only of immigration restrictionists.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/synagogue-attack-manchester-germany-terror

A day after an Islamist rampage against a British synagogue and two days after the indictment in Berlin of three suspected Hamas members for planning terror attacks in Germany, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and French president Emanuel Macron met in Saarbrücken, Germany, and warned of . . . right-wing threats to European democracies. Neither said a word about the Manchester assault or the Berlin indictment.

Instead, Merz announced to the European potentates commemorating the 35th anniversary of German reunification that “our liberal way of life is under attack, from both outside and within.” German broadcaster Deutsche Welle decoded for the clueless: Merz’s enemy “within” was the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD), Germany’s voice for immigration restrictionism.

Macron connected those external and internal threats: “authoritarian countries” outside Europe are “aligned with the extreme parties” inside Europe, he said. Europe’s “extreme parties” embrace a “new nationalism,” based on “hate of the other,” according to Macron. Unless European democrats fend off the “dark Enlightenment,” the European continent would become “like many others,” filled with “conspiracy theorists, extremes, noise, and fury.”

It required no decoding to pick up the reference to the North American continent.

German president Frank-Walter Steinmeier took up the same theme: political forces looking to undermine democratic institutions and poison debate with hatred were gathering strength, especially in Germany’s East—another boilerplate reference to the AfD. “Let’s not allow our democracy to be further damaged,” said Steinmeier.

The Saarbrücken speeches illustrate a key rule of contemporary European power: wheresoever two or more members of the European elite gather together, they will denounce the “far right,” right-wing “extremists,” and “dangerous nationalists.” They will ignore Islamist violence. In Saarbrücken, Merz did not note that attacks on Jews in Germany have been spiraling upward. Merz did not mention Germany’s knifing assaults by first- and second-generation immigrants or the fact that immigrants and their progeny commit a vast disproportion of crime.

Here’s Why Democrats Won’t Condemn Jay Jones’s Assassination Fantasies

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/09/heres-why-democrats-wont-condemn-jay-joness-assassination-fantasies/

After it came to light that Jay Jones, the Democratic nominee for Virginia’s attorney general, had fantasized about killing a political opponent and his children, some were surprised that other Democrats didn’t condemn him.

No one should have been surprised. Because what Jones said is a widely shared belief among Democrats these days.

According to National Review, which broke the explosive Jones story, he told a colleague that “the only way public policy changes is when policymakers feel pain themselves, like the pain that parents feel when they watch their children die from gun violence.” He was referring to a specific Republican state lawmaker and his family.

The reaction among fellow Democrats? Crickets.

If you think that’s scary, consider this:

Over the weekend, the Skeptic Research Center released results of a poll of 3,000 adults asking whether they agreed or disagreed with the statement: “violence is often necessary to create social change.” (Note the similarity between the question and what Jones said.)

What did the poll find?  Nearly half of young, liberal, well-educated adults – in other words, the mainstream of the Democratic party these days – condone political violence.

Of “very liberal” respondents, for example, 44% agreed that “violence is often necessary to create social change.” Among Gen Z liberals, the number rose to 49%.

About The “Jews” Van Jones blames “the Jews” for media silence on Nigerian massacres—but the real reason isn’t anti-Semitic conspiracy; it’s the left’s selective outrage and ideological blind spots. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/09/about-the-jews/

Van Jones, the CNN host and commentator, recently complained that neither the global left nor the mainstream media are covering the horrific violence against Nigerian civilians by Islamic terrorists.

True, they are not reporting the slaughter.

Truer still, they should be.

However, Van Jones went completely off the rails when he blamed “the Jews.”

Or as he put it, “No Jews, no news”—a stereotyped statement as anti-Semitic as it is untrue.

In truth, lots of mass violence worldwide is ignored.

Unlike Trump, neither the left nor the mainstream media cared much for the recent mass ethnic cleansing of Armenian Christians from Nagorno-Karabakh—more than 120,000—by Azerbaijani Muslims.

Nor did they report much on the dangerous May 2025 “mini” war between nuclear Pakistan and nuclear India, prompted by a mass killing by Pakistani terrorists.

These mostly ignored mass evacuations, terrorist acts, and ethnic cleansings had nothing to do with Jones’s absurd idea of “no Jews, no news.”

Nor were they neglected because of the color of the dead.

Who Should NOT Play a Role in Post-War Gaza: The Foxes in Charge of the Chicken Coop? by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21955/post-war-gaza-hamas

Qatar’s rulers appear to see their mission — with the aid of their Al Jazeera television empire, as well as big cheques — as spreading radical Sunni Islam throughout the region and the world. Qatar has been Hamas’s leading patron since 2007.

Trump seems to be looking toward Qatar as one of the main funders that will rebuild Gaza. If Qatar’s ruling family accepts this role, they will doubtless expect a role just as important in governing it, which could well include appointing who else might share that privilege. Candidates include the Palestinian Authority, the 2,000 returning terrorists, and, if not precisely Qatar’s longtime client, Hamas, then “Son of Hamas,” or “Hamas 2.0,” or “Hamas the Sequel.” One could call the enclave the “Democratic Republic of Gaza,” but it would still be home to genocidal terrorist groups…

How serious is Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas when he says that the Iran-backed Hamas terror group “will have no role in governance” of the Gaza Strip and it must hand over its weapons to the PA? Not even slightly.

Put bluntly, Abbas is not interested in returning to the negotiating table: he has been waiting for the UN and other international parties to impose a solution on Israel, just as French President Emmanuel Macron so helpfully offered to do just last month. The recent one-sided recognitions of a “Palestinian state” by France, Britain, Canada, Australia and other countries only reinforced Abbas’s determination not to resume any peace process with Israel. After all, why should he negotiate with anyone when the West is handing him a state on a silver platter without even a single condition attached?

Trump’s peace plan is peachy as long as Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Tony Blair are there to make sure everything stays in place. What, however, happens if and when they are not there anymore? A Middle East saying goes, “You have the watches, but we have the time.”

Abbas, and whoever succeeds him, will always prefer peace with Hamas over peace with Israel. He knows that Hamas continues to enjoy widespread support among Palestinians, most of whom, according to public opinion polls, are passionately opposed to disarming the terror group.

Those who state that Hamas should not be permitted to play any role in governing Gaza after the war ends should also demand the exclusion of the PA and Qatar from such a process. Allowing either Qatar or Abbas’s PA into the Gaza Strip will only pave the way for a new Hamas to enter through the back door.

How serious is US President Donald J. Trump about his peace plan? While everyone is eager to celebrate the successful completion of Phase One, with the return of the Israeli hostages in exchange for 2,000 imprisoned Palestinian terrorists, the rest remains to be seen.

The Trump Peace Plan began as an ultimatum: If Hamas would not release all the hostages within 72 hours, Israel would have the blessing of the US to “finish the job” full blast.

It is admirable that Trump wants peace and that, in his first term, he astonishingly produced the Abraham Accords. Now, he has brilliantly secured an agreement for release of all the hostages by October 13. If, however, the negotiations continue to go in the direction they seem to be going in, peace is the last thing Trump will achieve.

(June 28th, 2011) The Authentic Palestine Freedom Flotilla Ruth King

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9834/pub_detail.asp

No! I do not mean the motley crew of terrorist enablers, terrorists and assorted curs and knaves that is taking to the briny to defame Israel and bring “humanitarian” aid to the denizen of Gaza. Never mind those immoral misfits who forgot how the residents of Gaza trashed and looted and destroyed the farms, greenhouses, state of the art farming tools and implements, organic fertilizers and even seeds in the lush gardens of Gush Katif which provided 70% of Israel’s produce and $120,000,000 in exports of foods and flowers.

I speak of a real Palestine freedom flotilla….that fleet of ancient and ramshackle ships and the valiant volunteer crews that transported the wretched survivors of the Holocaust to Palestine in defiance of the perverse British blockade between 1946 and 1948.

A voyage of hope… and frustration.

Britain’s notorious White Paper of 1939 which effectively cut off Jewish immigration to Palestine on the eve of the Holocaust was a death sentence for millions of European Jews trapped in Europe. After World War 11, British perfidy persisted and the 1939 White Paper remained the basis of British policy.  Its cruel provisions kept wretched survivors of the Holocaust trapped and homeless in displaced persons’ camps in hostile European nations or behind barbed wire in detention camps in Cyprus.

There were more than 140 voyages by about 70 ships. Over half were stopped by British navy patrols and sent to internment camps is Cyprus, or Atlit detention camp and some to Mauritius. A wonderful book by the author Natacha Appanah titled “The Last Brother” details the travails of the refugees in Mauritius.

One of the groups of rescue ships was named “Alya Bet.” Its earlier history is marred by tragedy. In the 1930s a group calling themselves by the same name attempted to rescue Jews from Europe but their efforts were hopeless. However, after the war the goal of taking survivors to Palestine became urgent and the movement for transferring refugees coalesced.

With breathtaking speed, Christians, Jews and philanthropists working together purchased ten ships which were fitted and manned by American and Canadian volunteer seamen. Many demobilized servicemen and merchant marine officers and oilers including many Christians volunteered, and many had no naval experience, but their mission was to rescue all Europe’s Jewish refugees who wanted to go to blockaded Palestine.

All but two of the ships were almost decrepit…four from pro World War 1, but among them they carried 60,000 refugees.

Greta’s Gaza Flotilla Fantasy By John Gustavsson

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/10/gretas-gaza-flotilla-fantasy/

The Swedish activist’s latest odyssey will hopefully be her last.

Since her school strike in the fall of 2018, then-15-year-old Greta Thunberg has become arguably the most prolific activist in the world. Recently, she has found herself detained by the Israeli military for the second time in less than four months, after she and the so-called Freedom Flotilla Coalition attempted to breach the Israeli naval blockade of Gaza.

For a brief period, Thunberg appeared to be leaving her activist life behind. Since 2020, climate issues have lost much of the grip they had on voters during the latter half of the 2010s. Faced with rising inflation, policymakers have turned their focus back to pocketbook issues. Greta herself appeared to be ready to turn the page as she enrolled at Stockholm University in the fall of 2023.

Unlike many of her other political opponents, I genuinely wished her well upon hearing this. Greta’s life story, far from inspiring, is in fact quite sad. As news spread internationally of her school strike outside the Swedish parliament, she was generally depicted as an ordinary teenager who had had enough of climate inaction.

Nothing could be further from the truth. Greta, in fact, hails from a family of celebrities. Her mother, Malena Ernman, is a famous opera singer who once represented Sweden in the Eurovision Song Contest, the world’s largest music competition. Her father, Svante Thunberg, is an actor and producer, and so were both of her late paternal grandparents. A year before Greta — supposedly of her own accord — decided to go on her school strike, her mother had published an opinion piece in Dagens Nyheter, Sweden’s newspaper of record, arguing in favor of stronger climate action.

Malena Ernman would later claim that she was recruited into environmentalism by Greta rather than the other way around. We may never know for sure, but we do know that Greta’s school strike was not her first extended absence from school. Years before Greta was famous in her own right, her mother spoke extensively about her daughter’s mental health struggles. She revealed that she even had to take Greta out of school for months at a time and stay home with her around the clock to make sure she ate. Around this time, Greta was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, an autism spectrum disorder.

Greta’s shift to pro-Palestinian activism after October 7, 2023, mirrors a broader trend of left-wing activists pivoting to the “next big thing” as climate issues lost political traction. Her embrace of radical causes suggests a pattern: a young woman, shaped by a celebrity family and intense public scrutiny, may be struggling to reclaim the spotlight that once defined her.

In any case, the Gaza flotilla, like the narrative of Greta Thunberg as an ordinary climate-conscious teenage girl, is built on lies and fantasies.

Much as Greta’s true background isn’t well known outside of Sweden, neither is the story of the “Freedom Flotilla Coalition,” which began in Sweden in 2010. Its members attempt to portray themselves as a coalition of ordinary, concerned citizens, but even the very first ship to Gaza 15 years ago was a celebrity voyage. Passengers included author Henning Mankel, musician Dror Feiler, and historians Mattias Gardell and Edda Manga. All of them are famous in Sweden.

Gavin Newsom’s American dystopia The California model of ‘oligarchical socialism’ would shatter the American Dream. Joel Kotkin

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/07/gavin-newsoms-american-dystopia/

President Gavin Newsom met today in Carmel, California with the representatives of the “Ten” – a consortium of giant tech and finance firms who control most of America’s business assets. Facing a challenge from front-running New York senator Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who is pushing for a radical redistribution of wealth and property, Newsom has struck a deal with the oligarchs. He has imposed a universal basic income to head off a mounting populist revolt.

Some have called it a second Magna Carta – an accommodation between state and oligarchy. Others see the outlines of a new feudalism, or a technocratic fascism, rather than anything resembling liberal democracy.’

Implausible? Hardly. At a time when a handful of firms now dominate industries from tech to entertainment and media, and incomes for all but the wealthy are stagnating or falling, ever fewer see the system as working for them. According to Edelman, a strong majority in 22 countries now believe capitalism does more harm than good.

In the US, rising inequality and fear of downward mobility are fuelling support for state expansion and redistribution. Most under-40s favour socialism. Worse for the oligarchs, a majority of young people also favour limiting higher incomes. A new radical politics is incubating in cities like Oakland, Minneapolis, Seattle, Los Angeles and, most obviously, New York – its likely next mayor, Zohran Mamdani, is a self-described ‘democratic socialist’.

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) could accelerate this trend, cutting even white-collar and graduate employment while boosting the profits, as well as the market share, of a handful of giant firms. Like Mickey Mouse, as the sorcerer’s apprentice in Fantasia, techies have unleashed forces that threaten many in their own class of educated professionals. Some 82 per cent of millennials believe AI will damage their careers. The displacement could soon reach 30 per cent of the workforce. Skilled professionals in finance, media and the arts could be undercut as AI trains itself on their past work. As one Marxist writer put it, no power on Earth is more fearsome than ‘the swelling population of college graduates caught in a vice of low-paying jobs’.

AI evangelists like McKinsey insist it will enrich society. But such elite enthusiasm for the future is not widely shared. A Wall Street Journal-NORC poll recently found that only 25 per cent of Americans believe they have a good chance of improving their living standards – the lowest proportion since 1987. Almost 70 per cent say the ‘American dream’ – that if you work hard, you can get ahead – no longer holds true. Among Democrats, pessimism is overwhelming, with 90 per cent holding a negative view of the future, almost twice as many as Republicans.

Having foreseen these trends, much of the Silicon Valley elite sees the mass of humanity, some of whom already eschew the value of hard work, as increasingly redundant. As they automate everything – even companionship – the oligarchical elites rarely mention mobility or opportunity. Researcher Gregory Ferenstein, who interviewed 147 digital founders, found little interest in expanding property ownership or entrepreneurship. The preference is for redistribution sufficient for the masses to subsist while the elites luxuriate. At the same time, unions are suppressed by ‘progressive’ firms like Apple and Amazon, and responsibility for workers’ incomes is shifted to the state.

This is all of the essence of oligarchic feudalism. Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Travis Kalanick (former head of Uber) and Sam Altman (founder of OpenAI) all favour a guaranteed annual income – not out of solidarity with the masses, but to stave off unrest. Unlike the ‘Penthouse Bolsheviks’ of the 1930s, they have no intention of paying for this themselves. The burden would fall instead on the squeezed middle class, who would likely foot much of the bill for guaranteed wages, healthcare, free college and housing assistance, alongside subsidising gig workers, who do not receive benefits from their employers.

Rome Caters to Mecca When appeasement becomes continental suicide. by Joseph Hippolito

https://www.frontpagemag.com/rome-caters-to-mecca/

New Yorkers recently encountered what Londoners and residents of other cities in the British Isles have been enduring.

On Sept. 25, a large group of Muslims combined religious fervor with political protest by praying in front of Trump Tower. Not only have the British, Scottish and Irish seen such gatherings but experienced far worse: migrants, usually Muslims, raping and sexually abusing women and girls. More than 100,000 demonstrators on Sept. 13 protested the British government’s inaction and apparent goal to make such migrants a protected class immune from law.

In response to those crimes, Catholic bishops in Britain and Ireland react the way American bishops do toward crimes committed by migrants who enter the United States illegally.

“Have you heard one English bishop express sympathy for the English people’s concerns about criminal aliens invading our country? I haven’t,” the Rev. Nick Donnelly, a British Catholic deacon, wrote. “Have you heard one English bishop express outrage over the hundreds of thousands of English girls raped by men from foreign cultures? I haven’t.”

Why? Because the Vatican helped build the Trojan Horse which Muslim migration to Europe represents.

As FrontPage Magazine reported in March, the Vatican strikes an indulgent pose toward Islam that reeks of appeasement, to the point of ignoring persecution. As part of its posture, the Vatican actively encourages Muslim migrants to come to Europe while maintaining silence about anti-social behavior and its broader consequences.

The Vatican’s indulgence not only demonstrates its more conciliatory approach toward Islam. It also reflects attempts to forge an alliance that would foster international peace and justice. Pope John Paul II initiated plans for such an alliance to present an ideological alternative following European Communism’s demise.