RUTHFULLY YOURS

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm-plus/israels-war-of-survival/

Israel faced the Hobbesian choice of passing the point of no return and exposing itself to the risk of a nuclear attack by Iran or taking military action in time to prevent that catastrophe from happening. Israel wisely chose the latter course. Israel conducted “preemptive” strikes against Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities (including the Natanz enrichment site), long-range missile facilities, and aerial defenses on June 12th, which also killed several military commanders and nuclear scientists.

The United States did not participate in the Israeli strikes inside Iran. However, when the Iranian regime responded with barrages of drones and ballistic missiles aimed at Israeli population centers, the U.S. helped Israel to intercept as many of them as possible. Although some of Iran’s missiles managed to get through Israel’s multilayered defense systems and hit their targets, many lives were undoubtedly saved by U.S-Israeli defense cooperation.

Israel haters leaped at the chance to blame Israel for taking forceful military action to defend itself against the rapidly approaching existential threat of nuclear annihilation at Iran’s hands.

For example, the extremist leftwing group Code Pink said,

“We strongly condemn Israel’s unprovoked and reckless attack on Iran, which risks igniting a catastrophic regional war. This dangerous escalation threatens millions of lives across the entire Middle East. The U.S. must not continue to support and enable this illegal act of aggression.”

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) declared:

“We condemn Israel’s offensive strike on Iran and the broader pattern of aggression it represents. Netanyahu is using American weapons and taxpayer dollars to launch illegal and destabilizing wars across the region. President Trump must act immediately to suspend all military support to Israel and stop allowing U.S. arms to fuel war crimes, mass civilian death, and regional collapse.”

Pro-Hamas campus groups in the United States rallied around Hamas’s puppet master Iran. “We reject the US/Zionist attack on Iran, and affirm Iran’s right to self-defense, sovereignty, and self-determination,” Columbia University’s pro-Hamas student organization Apartheid Divest posted following Israel’s strikes. “No to the imperialist was of encroachment — from Syria to Lebanon to Iran — and YES [sic] to the people’s struggle for Palestinian liberation.”

All of this is, of course, pure falsehood.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/after-30-years-of-hesitation-netanyahu-pulled-the-trigger/ar-AA1GFxwS

(Bloomberg) — Benjamin Netanyahu has said for three decades that the central threat to Israel’s existence is Iran’s nuclear program. At least twice over that period, he came within inches of carrying out an attack on it.

Now, at age 75, the Israeli premier has launched the biggest strike on Iran in his country’s history. It’s an operation of enormous risk and promise that will define the legacy of Israel’s longest-serving leader — and upend the Mideast.

In a speech to the nation Friday evening, Netanyahu said he ordered preparations for the assault back in November. But the audacious attack was the result of a confluence of factors dating back years.

Hamas’ deadly 2023 attack forced a rethinking of how Israel defends itself and allowed its military to decimate threats from Iranian proxies like Hezbollah. After years of efforts, Israeli intelligence had penetrated Iran so deeply it could strike its protected nuclear program from inside the country. A supportive US president and a hawkish circle in the Israeli leadership made it possible for Netanyahu, his own popularity tarnished, to make the move he’d avoided for so long.

A day after the first wave of attacks — hundreds of warplanes hit hundreds of sites 1700 km (1000 miles) away — it’s far too early to assess how this new war will develop and whether it will expand beyond Iran and Israel.

But initial reports have led Israeli commentators to argue that the operation is so far a success: a dozen top Iranian military officials and nuclear scientists killed, a major nuclear site badly damaged and Iran’s capacity to retaliate curbed. Late Friday, Israel said it had hit another nuclear installation, this time in Isfahan.

Shortly afterward, Iran launched missiles at Israel and residents were ordered to shelters. Authorities reported several people were injured by the attacks in the central part of the country. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, vowed to “act forcefully” and avenge the Israeli strikes. That retaliation is expected both directly and indirectly, and Israel’s assault is due to last days or weeks. 

Since thousands of Iran-backed Hamas operatives broke into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing 1200 people and abducting 250, Israel has taken a much more aggressive approach to its borders, stationing its troops inside Gaza, Lebanon and Syria, and relying less on opponents’ intent and focusing on their capabilities. 

Attacked on all sides as Iranian proxies Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen joined in, Israelis felt they were in a battle for their survival — even if from afar many saw a powerful, nuclear-armed nation against small militias that couldn’t challenge it. 

Since then, Israel has carried out a brutal war in Gaza, destroying vast areas and killing some 55,000, according to the Hamas-run health ministry. It has taken out the missile arsenals of Hamas and Hezbollah and helped trigger the collapse of the Syrian regime. 

https://www.steynonline.com/15383/more-war

Is this a new war? Lindsey Graham, member of the Order of Prince Yaroslav the Wise, seems to think so and is panting like Jeffrey Toobin on a Zoom call:

Game on.

Washington has also revealed that it shared its heads-up from Israel with one of its Arab allies – presumably the Saudis.

So far, for Israel, it’s going well: they have destroyed the Republican Guard headquarters and killed its commander, General Salami. In other targeted assassinations, the head of the Iranian army is dead, as are more than ten nuclear scientists, and various other bigshots, including at least one potential successor to Ayatollah Khamenei, who for the moment appears to be alive. It’s the biggest military action on the soil of the Islamic Republic since the Iran/Iraq War forty years ago.

~To get the obvious out of the way, what should America do?

That’s probably correct as far as the politics of it is concerned. But the other reason for not getting America involved is, of course, that the Pentagon is totally crap at war. So, if the US is on your side, you’ll lose. See, most recently, Afghanistan and Ukraine – the former an international humiliation, and the latter having been micro-managed from Washington until January 20th with equally disastrous results, at least for the dwindling number of Ukrainians living in Ukraine. US military effectiveness is fading from living memory: for three-quarters of a century now, Washington has been utterly unable to use war to achieve any strategic national objective – despite accounting for forty per cent of the entire planet’s military expenditures. There is nothing to suggest Iran is likely to be an exception to the rule.

~That presents Israel with certain challenges. If you want to end the Iranian nuclear programme – or at least set it back twenty years – you have to have state-of-the-art bunker-busters that can penetrate all the way down at the Fordow enrichment facility just south of Qom. I’m not sure Israel has such weapons, and I doubt Netanyahu will know until they try it and it works. I note that Freddie Forsyth, who died a few days ago, has a scene in one of his novels in which the Fordow plant is taken out by a precocious computer hacker, which would probably be the best way to do it. Alas, in the real world, the mullahs are more sophisticated than all the “Death to America!” street-dancing would suggest.

~That said, as always with Israel, the creativity and innovation is impressive:

~Will the new war remain finely focused – alternating barrages raining down on Tehran and Tel Aviv – or will it spread beyond? For three years, setting aside occasional provocations such as the Nordstream pipeline, the war in Europe has been contained within Ukraine. In the Middle East Iran has proxies throughout the region – Hamas, Hizb’allah, Houthis… It would seem unreasonable to expect the mullahs to show the same forbearance as Putin.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/06/israel-was-left-with-only-one-choice-on-iran/

On early Friday morning Middle East time, Israel launched an extensive strike on Iran’s nuclear program. Airstrikes hit Iran’s ballistic-missile facilities and its nuclear-enrichment site Natanz along with other targets, while further precision operations (reportedly involving the Mossad) took out top Iranian military brass along with nuclear scientists. The operation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, would continue “for as many days as it takes” to neutralize any threat from Iran’s nuclear program.

While the prospect of an Israeli strike on Iran’s nuclear capacity has long been discussed, several factors made it more urgent, and more possible. Iran had significantly ramped up its enrichment capacity, with even the U.N.’s International Atomic Energy Agency (not exactly friendly to Israeli militarism) having determined that Iran had been enriching uranium well beyond the level of civilian use, and closer to military grade. With just some more refinement, Iran would be in the position to produce ten nuclear bombs.

A nuclear Iran dedicated to Israel’s destruction is an existential threat. An overwhelming majority of Israel’s population lives either in Jerusalem or in a small strip of coastal land that includes Tel Aviv — and all of those targets are well within range of Iran’s missiles. Even if Iran never pulled the trigger on a nuclear weapon, their mere possession of one would allow the radical Islamist regime that vows “Death to America” to operate with impunity as it financed terrorist attacks, targeted U.S. assets and service personnel, and engaged in other malign behavior that destabilizes the region.

Several developments since the October 7 massacres have also made the current attack more feasible. Last fall, Israel managed to cripple Iranian air defenses in a retaliatory attack without losing a single pilot, which both demonstrated Israel’s ability to strike inside Iran and made the nuclear sites more vulnerable. During the strikes overnight, there was no evidence of any response from Iran’s air defense. Additionally, on two occasions (April and October of last year), Iran launched hundreds of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel but was not able to do much damage thanks to a joint Israeli and American defensive effort. So far in response to the current Israeli strikes, Iran has fired 100 drones at Israel, to no avail.

Another crucial factor behind the timing of these strikes is having an ally in the White House. Over the past several months, the administration was in a tug-of-war between those seeking to prevent an Israeli strike and the Iran hawks that played out via leaks and public debates. This likely reflected Trump’s own internal debate. Several months ago, he urged Israel to back off attacking Iran and had his envoy Steve Witkoff conduct multiple rounds of nuclear talks, which created concerns from hawks that he may sign onto a bad deal. Even hours before the attacks, Trump announced he was still dedicated to pursuing a negotiated solution. Whether or not he was actively participating in a ruse to keep Iran from thinking an attack was imminent, this was clearly helpful in adding an element of surprise to an operation that involved very obvious tells, including the recent removal of U.S. embassy staff and other military assets within striking distance of Iran.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21684/iran-weakness

These empty threats [to Hamas in January and Iran in March], more than anything, seem to have reinforced Iran’s belief that it could stall, maneuver, and harden its position while the U.S. scrambled, desperate for a leverage it appeared to have dropped.

The U.S. appeared afraid of escalation. The U.S. seemed to want a deal more than Iran did.

Iran’s negotiators dragged their feet, demanded more concessions, and eventually made it unmistakably clear that they would not halt uranium enrichment. Khamenei, in a rare address, explicitly stated that uranium enrichment was Iran’s “sovereign right” and “not subject to foreign dictates.”

Instead of walking away, Trump did something that most likely stunned even Iran’s most skeptical officials — he reached out to Russia. He asked Russian President Vladimir Putin, Iran’s closest global ally, to help mediate a deal. After drawing red lines and watching them crumble, after declaring enrichment a non-negotiable issue, the U.S. turned to Russia — the same Russia that Iran is arming in the Ukraine conflict — for help. For Iran, this was not just weakness. It was a full display of incompetence.

In Tehran’s calculus, this moment confirmed everything it had suspected: that the U.S. was willing to crawl, plead and negotiate on its knees to get Iran to… sign a piece of paper! They saw Trump’s pivot to Putin as a validation of their strategy — stall, resist, and wait for Washington to blink.

Meanwhile, Israel had been sounding the alarm for years. Its intelligence services repeatedly uncovered secret Iranian sites, hidden stockpiles and covert operations…. Time had run out.

The Islamic Republic of Iran was no longer hiding its ambitions or disguising its defiance. It was openly confronting the United States, discarding every red line and ultimatum Washington drew in the sand.

At the center of the regime’s defiance lay one uncompromising reality: Iran would not stop enriching uranium. U.S. President Donald J. Trump made it clear: if Iran wanted a deal, enrichment had to stop. Period. Iran repeatedly came back with “no.” Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and his top nuclear negotiators declared again and again that enrichment was off the table. In fact, they escalated it. Iran’s leaders mistook Trump’s preference not to use crushing military force for a lack of resolve to stop them.

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/06/13/iran-is-everything-they-accuse-israel-of-being/

For decades, an aggressive, quasi-imperial state has been at the centre of conflict in the Middle East. It has consistently antagonised its neighbours and in some cases threatened their very existence. And through its shadowy military operatives, it has sought to impose its will on allies and enemies alike.

That state is the Islamic Republic of Iran. It is everything the West’s bourgeois leftists imagine Israel to be. It has a genuinely ‘rogue’ and far-right government. A regime that, through its infamous Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and heavily armed regional proxies, has sought to project its power and influence throughout the Middle East. Unlike Israel, it even has a genuinely genocidal objective – namely, the eradication of the Jewish State, or the ‘Zionist entity’ to use its leaders’ own patois. As its supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, put it in 2020, Israel is a ‘cancerous tumour’ that ‘will undoubtedly be uprooted and destroyed’.

That is why the prospect of the Islamic Republic developing nuclear weapons has always terrified Israel’s leaders. Because for a regime ideologically committed to the destruction of Israel, nuclear weapons are much more than a deterrent – they are a means to a Jew-annihilating end.

And that is why, early on Friday morning, the Israel Defence Forces carried out lethal aerial attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities, scientists central to Iran’s atomic plans and several senior generals. Because Israel’s leadership was rightly concerned that Iran would soon be in possession of its own nuclear warheads.

Indeed, on Thursday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which monitors signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, ruled that Iran had violated its treaty obligations. It claims Iran has amassed 400 kilos of highly enriched uranium, which is ideal for military use. Within hours of the IAEA’s announcement, Israel had started an operation designed, in the words of Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to roll back ‘the Iranian threat to Israel’s very survival’.

It really didn’t have to be this way. Indeed, it is only in recent decades that Iran has posed, as Netanyahu puts it, ‘a threat to Israel’s survival’. Indeed, after Israel’s founding in 1948, Iran under the Shah actually had a cordial relationship with the fledgling Jewish State. Iran was seen by Israel as a regional mediator, at points even an ally. And vice versa – the Iranian novelist and anti-Western critic, Jalal Al-e Ahmad, visited Israel in 1963 and subsequently praised the collectivist spirit of Zionism.

So, while anti-Semitic violence ravaged Arab nations like Egypt, Iraq, Libya and Syria during the 1950s and 1960s, there were no pogroms or purges in Iran. While an estimated 60,000 Iranian Jews did leave for Israel during its first three decades of existence, by 1978, there was still a thriving 85,000-strong Jewish community within Iran. It constituted perhaps the largest Jewish population in the Middle East outside Israel.

But that all changed in 1979, with the Iranian Revolution and the eventual ascendency of the Ayotallah Khomeini and his Islamist clique. With the foundation of the Islamic Republic, Iran’s relationship towards Israel became markedly hostile almost overnight. Its Islamist leaders, burning with anti-Semitic zeal, effectively turned the destruction of Israel into a raison d’être, and made life within Iran near enough intolerable for its Jewish population. Just 9,000 Jews live there today.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/death-to-irans-regime/

Last month, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei told an enraged crowd of Islamists that President Trump’s statements weren’t even “worthy of a response.”

As the crowd chanted “Death to America”, Iran’s leader called Trump a liar, and warned that, “America should leave the region, and leave it will.” Then he called for the destruction of the Jewish State while the crowd chanted, “Death to Israel.”

The only question was whether America and Israel would take the regime’s threats seriously.

That question was answered when Israel, after two decades of trying to get the mostly fictitious “international community” to do something about Iran’s nuclear program, finally took action.

The endless negotiations in pursuit of an impossible deal that would somehow allow Iran to have nuclear technology without nuclear weapons were based on refusing to listen to what the Islamist terror regime said, as recently as weeks ago, and refusing to believe that it meant it.

To believe in a nuclear deal, you also had to believe that a terror state that gets its electricity from its abundant natural gas resources for a fraction of the cost of our electricity wanted a civilian nuclear program. To believe in any kind of deal with Iran, you had to believe, as the New York Times insisted to sell Obama’s nuke deal, that Iran “has a complicated relationship with the phrase” and that when it says, “Death to America” and “Death to Israel”, it doesn’t really mean it.

“The situation between America and Iran is this: When you chant ‘Death to America!’ it is not just a slogan – it is a policy,” Ayatollah Khamenei explained in 2023.

What did that policy look like in practice?