Displaying posts categorized under

WORLD NEWS

Geert Wilders Calls for an End to Asylum Seekers After Muslim migrant murders 17-year-old girl in Amsterdam, by Hugh Fitzgerald

https://www.frontpagemag.com/geert-wilders-calls-for-an-end-to-asylum-seekers/

A Syrian “asylum seeker” — in reality, an economic migrant hoping to live off he many benefits the generous Dutch welfare state provides — has been arrested for stabbing to death a 17-year-old Dutch girl. In the week before that killing, he had sexually assaulted two other Dutch girls in separate incidents. In response to the killing, the anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders called for an immediate end to granting asylum to anyone. More on his infuriated demand, in a country where anti-Muslim sentiment is steadily rising, can be found here: “Wilders Calls for ‘Complete Asylum Shutdown’ After 17-Year-Old Girl Stabbed to Death in Amsterdam,” by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, August 25, 2025:

Dutch populist leader Geert Wilders has called for a complete shut down of allowing asylum seekers into the Netherlands in the wake of the killing of a 17-year-old girl in Amsterdam allegedly at the hands of an asylum seeker.

Last week, the Netherlands was horrified by the brutal death of 17-year-old Lisa, who was stabbed to death while returning to her Amsterdam apartment following a night out with friends.

On Friday, it was revealed that the 22-year-old suspect in the alleged murder was in the country as an asylum seeker. He is also suspected in two other incidents, including a violent sexual attack on another woman on August 14th and an attempted sexual assault on August 10th, according to Dutch daily De Telegraaf.

Following the disclosure of the suspect being an asylum seeker on Friday, Party for Freedom (PVV) leader Geert Wilders called for an immediate and “complete asylum ban” in the Netherlands.

The call was reiterated in the PVV’s manifesto for the upcoming general election in October released on Saturday. In a forward to the programme, Wilders said that “the Netherlands is full, overcrowded, absolutely overflowing.”

Muslim Brotherhood: A Global Jihadist Threat to the US, Europe, Middle East by Uzay Bulut

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21866/muslim-brotherhood-global-threat

According to the Department of Justice, in the early 1990s, the Muslim Brotherhood, planned to establish a network of organizations in the US to spread a militant Islamist message and raise money for Hamas. The Texas-based Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development (HLF) became the chief fundraising arm for the Palestine Committee in the US, created by the MB to support Hamas. In 2008, HLF leaders were convicted of crimes, including providing material support for Hamas.

“Jihad means the fighting of the unbelievers and involves all possible efforts that are necessary to dismantle the power of the enemies of Islam, including beating them, plundering their wealth, destroying their places of worship, and smashing their idols.” — Muslim Brotherhood founder Hasssan al Banna, The Way of Jihad.

Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups and networks are also exceedingly active in Europe and are richly funded by EU institutions.

The question is not whether the US government should list the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization. The answer to that is clear: yes, it should. A more pressing question is why these pro-jihad, Islamic supremacist organizations affiliated with the MB have been allowed to operate on the US soil for all those years.

US Senator Ted Cruz, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Africa and Global Health Policy, on July 16 introduced the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act of 2025. This bill implements a new, modernized strategy for designating the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) as a terrorist group.

Cruz said:

“The Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization, and it provides support to Muslim Brotherhood branches that are terrorist organizations. One of those branches is Hamas, which on October 7 committed the worst single-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, which included the murder and kidnapping of at least 53 Americans. They are committed to the overthrow and destruction of America and other non-Islamist governments across the world, and pose an acute threat to American national security interests. American allies in the Middle East and Europe have already labeled the Brotherhood a terrorist organization, and the United States should do the same, and do so expeditiously.”

Where We Are in the West Peter Smith

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/qed/where-we-are-in-the-west/

On July 9, 2024, Axel Rudakubana stabbed to death three young girls, ages 6, 7 and 9, at a dance class in Southport in the northwest of England . I know the town well. I stayed there only a few years ago when visiting my sister and niece in Liverpool. My dad often took us there for an outing. It is a very pleasant seaside town less than 20 miles from Liverpool, where I was born and grew up.

This is a description of the crime from the Doughty Street Chambers in the UK:

On 13 July 2024, aged 17 years old, he [Rudakubana] purchased a large knife. On 29 July, he travelled to the Hart Space on Hart Street, Southport. He targeted a dance workshop for young girls, mostly aged 6 to 11 years old. There were 26 children at the workshop. Within 15 minutes, he killed three of those girls, and attempted to kill eight more. He attempted to kill two adults who tried to stop him.

The girls who were killed were aged 6, 7, and 9. Elise, who was 7 years old, suffered 85 sharp force injuries to her body. Bebe, who was 6 years old, suffered at least 122 sharp force injuries to her body. The children who survived suffered between one or two to 32 stab wounds. 

Rudakubana was sentenced to a minimum of 52 years in prison in January this year. This sentencing note from the Liverpool Crown Court gives a more comprehensive account of the horrific events, if you can handle reading it. Because he was seventeen and not eighteen at the time he avoided a whole-of-life sentence. Where is capital punishment when nothing else remotely fits the bill? ‘Executed and in everlasting Hell’ would seem a fitting epitaph.

If you look up the killer you will find that he was born in Cardiff in 2006 to Rwandan parents who had been admitted to the UK in 2002. You will also find a good deal of emphasis given to them being evangelical Christians. At the same time, one of the charges against Rudakubana was possession of an Al-Qaeda training manual. Put that together with killing girls dancing and it has the fetid smell of Islamic terrorism, though the authorities found nothing corroborating that connection — apparently. How can that be trusted these days is a separate question. What is clear is that Rudakubana is no evangelical Christian.

The police, in their monumental incompetence and loyalty to the compromised political class, gave out no information on the killer. Thus rumours spread. A popular variant of which was that the killer was a Muslim asylum seeker. A Muslim? I wonder why? Just a thought. Could it be anything to do with teen girls’ legs being blown off at an Ariana Grande concert on May 22, 2017, in Manchester? Or the killing and attempted beheading of British Army soldier Lee Rigby in 2013? Or the London bombings of 2005? Or any of the 48,000+ deadly Islamic terrorist attacks worldwide since 9/11? (See religionofpeace.com)

Riots followed the rumours about Rudakubana which followed the killings. Starmer came down hard on the rioters. What else would you expect from Western politicians these days who represent no-one but themselves or perhaps, which comes to the same thing, some evil force or other. Over emotional? Maybe. But how else to explain them flooding their respective countries with culturally discordant refugees and asylum seekers, and then persecuting those among their own citizens who are driven to object.

Lucy Connolly, intelligent, personable, a mum and child-minder, wife of an engineer and Conservative councillor, objected. She had an immediate and impassioned reaction to the depraved murder of three young girls and the cruel wounding of others. Who wouldn’t? She posted this message on X:

 “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.”

Thinking better of it, she deleted the post 3½ hours later. Though to me it is nothing more than a common or garden emotional reaction that you could have heard in any pub. She plead guilty to inciting racial hatred. She did not obtain legal advice and lacked an understanding of what it might mean to plead guilty, as she explains here. Obviously she did not expect to be sent to prison. She was sentenced to 31 months imprisonment. Jailed in October last year, she was freed in late August this year, having served the required minimum ten months.

The Woman Behind the Veil by Sara Al Nuaimi

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21829/the-woman-behind-the-veil

When I ask my mother why she decided to wear the niqab, she looks at me, puzzled. “Decide?” she repeats, as if I’d asked why she “decided” to speak Arabic.

She manages her own stock portfolio entirely in Arabic… she notes that “wars slow things down, yet when there are wars, gold goes up.”

When asked what she thinks of interest, she explains that interest has multiple meanings. When someone is desperate or helpless and needs a loan with interest, that is unacceptable — it exploits the needy. But interest on her own deposits? That is her money “working” to bring more money.

She does not trust foreign stocks. Even locally, she is selective about private ventures, such as new hotels. “It’s never clear what they’re doing exactly,” she says. “They could be financing prostitution.”

Watching so many politicians talk about my mother’s niqab, I do not see bad intentions. I see concern. People want to protect their culture. They worry that foreign customs might slowly replace their own. It is true of people in the West, as well, who might worry that people could be in their midst who wish to replace miniskirts with burqas.

This response is not prejudice. What people are picking up on — sometimes without knowing how to name it — is that people wish to protect what matters to them…. Like church bells in Salzburg or kimonos in Kyoto, they belong to a place, and they deserve to be protected.

In the end, my mother’s story is not really about the niqab. It is about how to stay rooted in a world that keeps shifting.

This means being yourself within the world as you find it, not demanding the world to change for you. That is the kind of wisdom we do not talk about enough.

When most of the world sees a woman in a niqab, a face veil that covers everything except the eyes, the assumptions are predictable — and harsh.

Recently, in Dubai, a tourist filmed a woman in a niqab eating at a restaurant. The tourist and her friend were treating the woman as if she were entertainment for them, rather than as a person trying to enjoy her dinner. Eventually, when the video clip went viral on social media, the Dubai Police issued a statement that they were investigating the matter.

Even in a Muslim-majority country, the woman could not simply be out in public without becoming a spectacle.

In 2017, Australian Senator Pauline Hanson wrote about the burqa, which covers the whole body and face:

“I have long believed that full face coverings, such as the burqa, were oppressive, presented barriers to assimilation, disadvantaged women from finding employment, were causing issues inside our justice system, presented a clear security threat and has no place in modern Western society.”

French President Macron Rewards Terrorism, Whips Up Slaughter by Guy Millière *******

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21875/france-macron-rewards-terrorism

So, Macron actually regards these views — approving the October 7, 2023 massacre of Jews and continuing terrorism to displace Israel — as “legitimate aspirations”? Good to know.

Macron’s calls for an immediate ceasefire could save Hamas from destruction — exactly what Hamas and Qatar want.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia have to see that the terrorist state they are about to recognize has no borders, no internationally recognized territory, and meets no criteria of any kind as required in the Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) for a state to be recognized.

“Article 80 of the UN Charter… preserves intact all the rights granted to Jews under the Mandate for Palestine, even after the Mandate’s expiry on May 14-15, 1948…. As a direct result of Article 80, the UN cannot transfer these rights over any part of Palestine… to any non-Jewish entity.” — Howard Grief, Esq., Algemeiner, September 22, 2011.

France, the UK, Canada and Australia also realize that Israel cannot stop the war without the return of all the hostages. What would they do if their citizens were held hostage? Or are they already?

If France, the UK, Canada and Australia are so committed to the creation of a Palestinian State, surely they will be happy to donate some of their plentiful land for it.

[A]pproximately 1,000 trucks were blocked for days because the United Nations refused to distribute the aid, leaving it to rot in the sun, even after Israel offered the UN military protection.

In November 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. The ICC accused them — not Hamas which stole most of the food — of crimes against humanity.

Hamas is an organization with straightforwardly unhidden genocidal goals:….

This continual demonization of Israel has sadly led to an increased hatred of Israel, a tiny country that, ironically, is fighting to protect the very countries defaming it. A thank you would be nice.

What is at stake now is not only Israel’s survival but the need for democracies to understand the central danger confronting them, and finally to start combatting it.

During the Second World War, all those grateful for the hard-won freedoms of the democratic world saw that the only way out was not compromise and submission, but the full destruction of the Third Reich — not giving it a “state.”

July 24,2025: French President Emmanuel Macron announces that he will officially recognize a “Palestinian State.” He publicizes a letter he sent to Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, and praises his “courageous commitments”. In it, Macron emphasizes his desire to “fulfill the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people” and that “We must immediately implement a ceasefire, release all hostages and provide massive humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza,”⁠ Macron reportedly announced. He did not, however make recognizing a fictitious Palestinian state conditioned on any of that.

“Peace is possible,” he added, along with the notion that “Building a Palestinian state and ensuring its viability would ‘contribute to the security of all in the Middle East.”‘

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu replied that the decision “rewards terror” and would create ” a launch pad to annihilate Israel .”

Is Syria’s New Leader a Reformed Terrorist or Deceptive Strategist? Ambassador (Ret.) Yoram Ettinger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUpfwBY5gPI

Is the new Syrian leader, al-Jolani, truly transformed from a terrorist into a pragmatic statesman? Or, is he employing Taqiyya—disguise and deception—to lure Western nations into a trap? Explore the shifting tactics, underlying motives, and what it means for international relations.
US policy should condition the lifting of sanctions and the resumption of diplomatic ties on ending hate education, halting inciting sermons, stopping hateful official media, and publicly disavowing the vision of establishing a global Islamic society governed solely by Islam.

Macron’s Hidden Game: Turn Against Israel Animated by Rising Political Clout of French Muslims The French president can’t run again in 2027 and will have to wait until 2032 to try for his real goal — a third term. By Michel Gurfinkiel

https://www.nysun.com/article/macrons-hidden-game-turn-against-israel-animated-by-rising-political-clout-of-french-muslims

According to the latest Elabe/Les Echos polling, only 21 percent of the French — one citizen out of five — say they trust President Emmanuel Macron, writ large, and 73 percent say they don’t. More remarkably, only 41 percent of the French who voted for him in the 2022 presidential election say they still trust him, and 54 percent say they don’t any longer. 

Likewise, 62 percent of the French — according to an even more recent CSA poll — don’t trust the president either when it comes to stemming a rising tide of antisemitism, despite his protestations to the contrary. 

Monsieur Macron was indignant when both the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, and the American ambassador to France, Charles Kushner, publicly questioned his stand in this matter a few days ago.

It looks like more than six French citizens out of ten side with Israel’s premier and America’s envoy rather than with their own president on this issue. “Trust” is a key word here. The French are not so absurdly down to earth as to expect their president to succeed in all his endeavors. Yet the record of the present administration — now in its eighth year — keeps getting worse. 

In 2024, France ranks 24th globally in gross domestic product per capita, according to the International Monetary Fund. That is down from 11th place in the 1990s and 19th in 2017, the year Monsieur Macron was first elected. Public debt has soared to around 113 percent of the GDP in 2024, placing France third in the European Union behind Greece and Italy. Insecurity is rampant: Serious assaults rose to 628.3 per 100,000 in 2023 from 396.5 per 100,000 reported in 2017, according to United Nations statistics.

Immigration has slipped out of control, leading 61 percent of the French to believe that a “great replacement” by non-European immigrants is underway. The political scene has been thrown into chaos after the reckless dissolution of 2024 and the election of a new, hung National Assembly. A centrist, François Bayrou, Macron’s fourth prime minister in less than two years, might not survive a vote of no-confidence next week.

France’s New Guillotine: Silent Dictatorship by Drieu Godefridi

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21877/france-silent-dictatorship

On March 31, 2025, the Paris Criminal Court sentenced Marine Le Pen to five years of electoral “ineligibility” with immediate effect…. This sentence, described by the defendant as a “witch hunt”, bars the frontrunner in the polls from standing in the 2027 French presidential election.

The aim of this maneuver is clear: to remove the opposition leader from competing for the highest office in the land.

These court rulings form an impenetrable wall: an elected majority can vote, but the “wise” guardians of the left ensure that nothing passes that offends egalitarianism, environmentalism or the dogma of open borders.

In France, sadly, democracy, has become nothing more than an illusion: the people vote, but the bureaucracy blocks the will of the voters.

The new dictatorship appears based on a single ideology and the gradual suppression of freedoms and subverting the constitutional order in favor of a supposedly superior caste, whose contours, methods and appetites are reminiscent of what our American friends call the “deep state” – self-appointed bureaucrats running your life behind the scenes, where there is no transparency, accountability or readily available means to remove them.

In a cruel twist of history, France, the self-proclaimed cradle of the Enlightenment and freedom, has turned into a regime where democracy is nothing more than a mask, concealing a dictatorship that is still in its infancy but nonetheless unflinching. It is not a dictatorship of boots and uniforms; it is a hushed tyranny, judicial and institutional, crushing any hint of real change under the weight of its legal trappings.

I. France, a formal dictatorship: the judicial elimination of opponents

In a democracy, elections are the inviolable sanctuary of the popular will. In the France of 2025, justice, like a partisan guillotine, falls on opposition figures with surgical precision, rendering them supposedly too disqualified to compete. Examples reveal a damning pattern: searches (National Rally party), convictions (François Fillon, Marine Le Pen, Nicolas Sarkozy), smear campaigns (Éric Zemmour).

On March 31, 2025, the Paris Criminal Court sentenced Marine Le Pen to five years of electoral “ineligibility” with immediate effect, in the so-called European parliamentary assistants case. This sentence, described by the defendant as a “witch hunt”, bars the frontrunner in the polls from standing in the 2027 French presidential election.

The aim of this maneuver is clear: to remove the opposition leader from competing for the highest office in the land. The judges justified their decision on the grounds of misappropriation of European funds for the party’s national activities. Money it seems, intended for the party’s operations at European level was instead used by the national party in France. That is the whole story. It is a far cry from a violent crime or personal enrichment. No personal enrichment on the part of Le Pen was ever found. The timing of this ruling and the provisional exorbitant enforcement, betray the manipulation of the justice system by her opponents.

This is not an isolated case. The legal persecution of Le Pen’s National Rally is far from over.

Why Iran’s Ideology and Missiles Endanger the West: If Hitler Had Nuclear Weapons, Do You Think He Would Not Have Used Them? by Majid Rafizadeh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21868/iran-missiles-ideology

In his latest statement, Amir Hayat-Moqaddam [member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission] openly declared that Iran is capable of striking all of Europe and even US cities such as Washington and New York with missiles launched from offshore Iranian ships.

Western policymakers had been hoping for decades that engagement, dialogue and economic deals could temper Tehran’s revolutionary zeal. The regime’s latest statements, however, show that such hopes are illusory: Iran is not guided by pragmatic statecraft but by an uncompromising ideology that explicitly calls for global expansion of its revolution.

Hayat-Moqaddam’s words are not vague threats. They are a boast, a proclamation of a plan decades in the making. Such statements must be taken seriously: they reveal the true intentions of the regime: to extend its deterrent power by threatening both Europe and America, and to hold the West hostage to the fear of devastating missile strikes.

Iran’s investment in its ballistic missile arsenal is not defensive; it reflects a doctrine of “deterrence by punishment,” the idea that Iran can intimidate adversaries by holding their cities, infrastructure, and populations at risk of destruction. In this sense, Iran’s missile arsenal is not just a tool of war — it is an instrument of political leverage, designed to project power far beyond Iran’s borders.

[J]ust one missile tipped with a nuclear warhead hitting a European or American city would be catastrophic. Iran is estimated to still have thousands of ballistic missiles that can reach Europe when launched from Iranians soil. If launched from ships at sea, the continental United States is also within range of Iran’s missiles, as Iran is now openly warning.

Iran’s threat is not hypothetical; it is a proven capability paired with a proven willingness to use it.

Since 1979, Iran’s leaders have always regarded the United States and Europe as enemies, even before the West imposed sanctions or intervened in regional conflicts. The hostility is not reactive; it is ideological. Like Nazism in the 20th century, the Iranian regime’s ideology cannot be appeased with compromises.

The West must abandon the false hope that diplomacy alone will alter Tehran’s course. Sanctions must be maintained and expanded, not lifted in exchange for empty promises. The United States must keep a military option on the table, making clear that if Iran crosses red lines, it will face devastating consequences.

Iranian diplomats who serve as spies or agents for the regime’s ideological mission should be expelled, embassies shuttered, and Iran’s international presence curtailed. Equally important is supporting the Iranian people, many of whom have repeatedly risked their lives in protests calling for an end to clerical rule. The collapse of the regime from within is the only real long-term solution to the threat Iran poses to the world.

Iran’s leadership openly declares its intent to spread its revolution and to target Europe with missiles. To ignore such declarations would be an unforgivable mistake.

Unfortunately, the Iranian regime’s threats are not empty rhetoric. They are a continuation of a consistent ideological vision that has driven its policies since its Islamic Revolution in 1979. Iran’s leadership openly states that they seek not only the destruction of Israel but also the subjugation of the West. Iran’s missile arsenal and naval drills show that it is actively preparing for this confrontation; its ambitions for nuclear weapons underscore the urgency.

The West must not turn a blind eye or entertain illusions of “moderation.” Just as Europe once ignored Hitler’s ideology at its peril, ignoring Iran’s Islamist regime would be a historic mistake. The only path forward is to maintain relentless pressure, prepare militarily, support the Iranian people, and never allow this radical regime to realize its apocalyptic goals.

Recent remarks by a senior Iranian official, Amir Hayat-Moqaddam, a member of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, once again confirmed what many in the West have feared: the Islamic Republic of Iran’s grand strategy has always included targeting not only Israel and its neighbors but also Europe and the United States.

In his latest statement, Hayat-Moqaddam openly declared that Iran is capable of striking all of Europe and even US cities such as Washington and New York with missiles launched from offshore Iranian ships.

Europe in the Balance? Europe faces a breaking point as illegal migration, welfare strain, energy crises, and defense demands collide with shrinking populations and stagnant economies. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/28/europe-in-the-balance/

Almost weekly in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany, a sensational assault committed by an illegal migrant—often enjoying some sort of state support or with prior arrests for the same crime—surfaces.

Until recently, European politicians and the media sought to either ignore such news or accuse those who clamored for tighter borders, more police protection, and stiffer penalties of being “racists” or “xenophobes.”

Until recently, that is.

Mass protests are now common in Britain against the Labour Party’s open borders policies and generous welfare entitlements for immigrants who arrive illegally and without authentic “political refugee” status.

Greek officials, also swamped by illegal immigration, now cite President Trump’s secure border policies as new models for their own.

The majority of European immigrants now come from majority-Muslim countries in the Middle East and North Africa. Yet many arrivals seem angrier at their newfound liberal hosts than at the dictatorships they fled back home.

Europe’s immigration policies will not work in a multiethnic democracy.

Too many immigrants are arriving too quickly, without sufficient diversity, language fluency, skills, or familiarity with the customs and culture of their host nations. They often enter with separatist religious and cultural values antithetical to the very place they seek refuge.

Yet, there is no European plan of civic education to assimilate immigrants and teach them the rules, laws, and culture of their hosts.

It is then no surprise that what follows is ghettoization, resentment, and loud attacks on the very nation in which they seek sanctuary, denouncing it as decadent and godless.

In the past, Europe’s anemic military budgets, reliance on borrowed money, socialism, and a once-strong economy papered over these existential challenges of illegal immigration.