https://tomklingenstein.com/a-case-for-historical-clarity/
In the first days of the spring 2020 national shutdown, as the country froze in fear of the Chinese virus, I sat down with Nikole Hannah-Jones’ production: the Sunday, August 18, 2019 issue of The New York Times Magazine. It was branded The 1619 Project, consisting of 100 pages of pseudo-history, photo-essays, poetry, and an announcement from the Pulitzer Center that this extravaganza was on its way to school classrooms around the country.
This was not my first dive into Hannah-Jones’ fantasy world. I read the magazine cover to cover on its day of publication, and concluded then and there that someone would have to summon resistance to this effort to adulterate American history. From its first page, The 1619 Project set itself out to dethrone the Declaration of Independence as a statement of America’s founding principles. And not just the Declaration.
Through the lens of The 1619 Project, all of American history — from the arrival of the first English settlers — was to be seen as a tale of slavery, excuses for racial oppression, articulations of fake principles, and lies intended to mask continuing exploitation.
The following day I called my staff at the National Association of Scholars together to discuss how to respond. One member suggested that we frame our response as the “1620 Project,” after the arrival in New England of the Mayflower and the signing of the Mayflower Compact. That was one way to say that America had roots in a completely non-racial establishment of freedom and self-government.
