Displaying posts published in

September 2025

The Left Contrives Its Own Reality on Political Violence By Becket Adams

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/the-left-contrives-its-own-reality-on-political-violence/

The sanctimonious calls for unity are a little hard to take.

In the days following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, members of the Democratic Party and the press have complained that the right is not doing more to promote unity.

Unity would be nice, sure. You first.

“At moments like this, when tensions are high, then part of the job of the president is to pull people together,” former President Barack Obama told an audience last week.

“Whether we’re Democrats, Republicans, independents, we have to recognize that on both sides, undoubtedly, there are people who are extremists and who say things that are contrary to what I believe are America’s core values,” he said. “But I will say that those extreme views were not in my White House. I wasn’t embracing them. I wasn’t empowering them. I wasn’t putting the weight of the United States government behind extremist views. And that . . . when we have the weight of the United States government behind extremist views, we’ve got a problem.”

Obama then said, “My view was that part of the role of the presidency is to constantly remind us of the ties that bind us together.”

That he may sincerely believe those words would be laughable were it not the modus operandi of the Democratic Party and its media allies to invent alternate realities in which their people are forever the heroic and faultless champions of lofty ideals.

The Obama White House, alas, did not represent bipartisan comity. His administration was hardly respectful toward all viewpoints or mindful of constitutional rights. The Obama White House used the Espionage Act against U.S. reporters who refused to give up their sources, it secretly obtained phone records from the Associated Press, it oversaw a weaponized IRS that targeted conservative groups, and it turned the entire intelligence apparatus against the 2016 GOP presidential nominee.

We’re talking here about President “I want you to argue with them and get in their face” Obama, who, at a memorial service in 2016 for five murdered police officers, chose to scold law enforcement, saying, “With an open heart, police departments will acknowledge that, just like the rest of us, they are not perfect; that insisting we do better to root out racial bias is not an attack on cops, but an effort to live up to our highest ideals.” (Give the man credit: At least he managed something less glib than “acted stupidly.”)

How does one achieve unity with a man who lives in a fantasy land, where his opponents are the only ones responsible for political division? This goes well beyond just one man’s delusions and high self-regard; it’s a party-wide problem.

An especially loathsome example involves the tragic killing of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, State Senator John Hoffman. Many on the left insist they were the victims of right-wing political extremism — except that the man who allegedly murdered the couple appears to be an insane person, not an ideologically motivated assassin.

The Green Road to Ruin Gabriel Moens and John McRobert

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/doomed-planet/the-green-road-to-ruin/

By any standard, the increasingly frenzied activity on the climate frontlines is staggering. Australia is waiting on a decision by the United Nations to hold COP31 in Adelaide in November 2026. Australia’s application aims at displaying its global leadership in implementing a costly and futile program to replace the utilisation of fossil fuels with the deceptively named ‘renewable’ energy solar cells and wind turbines that are anything but clean or green in their implementation and operation.

On Thursday, September 18, 2025, the Prime Minister announced the government’s emissions reduction target of between 62 and 70 per cent by 2035. The government described the target as both ‘ambitious and achievable, sensible and serious.’[1] The setting of this target indicates that Australia’s climate gurus fail to understand  that human recycling of carbon dioxide as ‘emissions’ are not harmful to the planet, but are beneficial in both returning some of a life-supporting, vital trace gas back into an atmosphere that has been seriously depleted from much higher levels over millennia, and that the vast quantities of cheaply accessed, stored energy has allowed mankind wherewithal to live with endless cycles of feast and famine resulting from natural cyclical climate change.

This announcement comes just a few days after the release of a report by the Australian Climate Service, entitled Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment (Report).[2] The purpose of the Report is ‘to provide insights on how climate risk affects different sectors and regions of the country.’ [3] The government is boasting that 254 “experts” worked on the document, suggesting that this impressive number of scientists must necessarily translate into quality and reliable predictions about the impact of climate change.

This Report is a deeply flawed document that fails to discuss the effects of carbon dioxide objectively and impartially on the climate. It states that ‘Expansion of forest area typically removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and thus dampens global warming (IPCC, 2023)’.[4] This is demonstratively untrue, and any policy in favour of attempting to decarbonise a carbon and energy rich planet fails to acknowledge that the more carbon dioxide, the greener the planet!

But, more importantly, the Report assumes that the science of climate change is settled and that any doubts are odious examples of climate scepticism. Such a view is regrettable because the science is certainly not settled. We know more about the surface of the Moon than the bathymetry of the oceans that cover 70% of the globe whose surface temperatures govern local weather patterns in La Nina and El Nino Ocean current, cyclical occurrences, outside the room-control of mere mortals.

The Report is a hollow and result-oriented document. In uncritically assuming that the climate change cry is a real and unassailable proposition, it fails to address several critical issues, for example, does carbon dioxide really contribute to global warming?

President Trump’s Resolve to ‘Never Forget’ Trump may end up being the man to create a new reality in the Middle East. by Spencer Brown

https://www.frontpagemag.com/president-trumps-resolve-to-never-forget/

America’s promise to never forget Sept. 11 is primarily, but not exclusively, about remembering the 2,977 innocents murdered nearly a quarter century ago on an otherwise perfect September morning. In addition to keeping the victims’ memories alive and honoring the heroism of first responders in Manhattan, at the Pentagon, and aboard United 93, not forgetting also means recalling who attacked and how such an operation was pulled off to avoid the specter of repeating one of the darkest days in America’s history.

In hindsight, there were significant failures across the government that spanned political parties and presidents, stretching back to the waning days of the Cold War, when few, if any, Americans knew the names al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden, and most, instead, were fearing Soviet nukes and mutually assured destruction.

The threat of a radical Islamist attack on the homeland was there, however, and the pieces — namely the fanatics who carried out the hijackings, the funders who enabled the plot, and even the strategy itself — were falling into place decades earlier.

The book “Ghost Wars” by Steve Coll focuses on the U.S. government’s, primarily the CIA’s, actions from the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan to Sept. 10, 2001, providing an illuminating and jarring account of where many things went wrong. To better understand how the age of terrorism came to be, Jack Carr’s “Targeted: Beirut” is a meticulous and gripping retelling of the 1983 Marine Barracks bombing that, now looking back, marked one of the earliest attacks in what became the War on Terror that dominated the lives of the 9/11 generation.

Reading those books outside the time their stories take place makes it seem obvious where problems arose and contributed to the shock of Sept. 11, 2001. Yet, if they’re so obvious now, why have some of those mistakes-turned-warnings not been consistently heeded?

The damage done during four years of President Autopen was evident in real time — warnings for border agents to stay alert for Islamic terrorists inspired by Hamas barbarians’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel, numerous Biden administration officials testifying to Congress about how all the alarms were flashing red — yet course was not changed.

The Left’s Reaction to Jimmy Kimmel’s Firing Is Funnier Than He Ever Was

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/22/the-lefts-reaction-to-jimmy-kimmels-firing-is-funnier-than-he-ever-was/

It’s been amusing to watch the left’s reaction to ABC giving the boot to Jimmy Kimmel.

Not because of their rank hypocrisy when it comes to censorship. Or their claim that firing a low-rated late-night “comic” means “authoritarianism has arrived.” Or the fact that they are far more outraged that Kimmel lost his time slot than that Charlie Kirk lost his life over things they said.

What’s most amusing is how blissfully ignorant they are about how the news and entertainment industry works these days.

First, let’s dispense with the censorship ruse. ABC is a private company and is entitled to hire or fire whomever it wants. Networks do this all the time, usually without a peep of protest.

Last year, CBS fired veteran reporter Catherine Herridge – and seized her belongings – for unknown reasons. (She’d been investigating the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.) Also in 2024, NBC News fired former Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel shortly after hiring her as a commentator. There was no handwringing about the death of democracy.

If Kimmel’s ratings hadn’t been in the toilet, the network might have been willing to put up with his flagrant lying about Kirk’s alleged assassin, and his plan to double down on that lie the next night. ABC decided he wasn’t worth the hassle.