Displaying posts published in

August 2025

Edinburgh University’s war on the Enlightenment The ‘decolonisation’ movement is desperate to discredit the great thinkers of the past. Hugo Timms

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/08/03/edinburgh-universitys-war-on-the-enlightenment/

Few events have done more for human freedom and prosperity than the rise of secularism, capitalism and the Industrial Revolution. Scotland, and in particular its universities, was pivotal in their incubation and eventual flourishing. This period, beginning in the mid-18th century and known as the Scottish Enlightenment, was once considered to be a key achievement of civilisation, a hinge that allowed the history of the West to swing in a more liberal direction. But according to a new report commissioned by Edinburgh University, arguably the epicentre of this movement, this period is supposedly nothing to celebrate.

Apparently, the Scottish Enlightenment and Edinburgh University, in particular, were instead wellsprings of racism. Or, in the words of the report – co-authored by US academic Tommy J Curry – Edinburgh was a ‘haven’ for white supremacy. In particular, it blames the university for the discredited discipline of phrenology and it claims it played an ‘outsized role in developing racial pseudosciences’.

These accusations are levelled at the university in Decolonised Transformations, a report published this month that was commissioned by Edinburgh in 2021 in response to the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests. Curry – a philosophy professor at Edinburgh, who lists critical race theory as his speciality – appears to have clutched at every conceivable straw to justify his findings and to taint his university.

One of the report’s prime targets is 18th-century philosopher David Hume, initially a student and later a librarian at Edinburgh. Despite Hume’s published works exceeding 5,000 pages, the report focusses on a solitary footnote from 1753 in which he described ‘Negroes’ as ‘inferior to whites’. It is undoubtedly an unpleasant comment, but it is hardly proof that Hume contributed to the ‘intellectual justification’ for ‘transatlantic trafficking and enslavement of African people’, as the report wants us to believe.

The report goes on to claim Edinburgh played a ‘central role’ in promulgating the theory of phrenology. But again, the evidence it provides for this claim is distinctly threadbare. It appears to rely almost solely on the presence of two skulls in the university’s Anatomical Museum, which belonged to half-Barbadian students at Edinburgh in the 19th century. The report said it can ‘be assumed’ the students’ status as ‘mullato’ (of mixed white and black ancestry) ‘is what aroused interest’ in the skulls at the Edinburgh Phrenological Society. Well, perhaps it was. But it doesn’t exactly prove the university was ‘central’ in ‘assert[ing] the existence of the hierarchy of human races’, as the report claims.

In what must have been a moment of true desperation, the report turns its attention to James Sutherland, Edinburgh’s first professor of botany. After reading the heading, ‘Research Finding 3’ alongside ‘Empire’ and ‘Enslavement’, one might expect to discover that this quiet plant enthusiast had some sort of connection to the slave trade. Instead, we learn that his position was merely at the head of a ‘global network of botanisers’ who acquired seeds from the West Indies. We are left to infer that this is an unforgivable sin that we should still be atoning for, more than 300 years after his death. If only there were a statue of Sutherland to smear in red paint.

Curry’s determination to discredit his university doesn’t stop at 17th-century botany. In what is no doubt news to Israelis and Palestinians, Curry’s report also gives Edinburgh University a leading role in the current Gaza war, and the many conflicts preceding it. The basis for this imperceptibly tenuous link is the fact that Arthur Balfour, who in 1917 signed the Balfour Declaration in support of the creation of the Jewish State, was also chancellor of Edinburgh University. To atone for these supposed past sins and its alleged ‘ongoing entanglement’ with the war today, Curry suggests the university should repudiate its adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of anti-Semitism, and create a dedicated ‘Palestine Studies Centre’ while it’s at it.

From Hitler to the Ayatollahs: The Long History of European Treachery by Majid Rafizadeh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21812/iran-europe-treachery

As Israeli and American forces took awe-inspiring steps to cripple Iran’s nuclear weapons program and weaken the Islamic Republic’s regional power projection, the leaders of the EU3 — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — have been busy smiling across negotiating tables, scheming behind closed doors to help the regime survive.

European leaders are now locked in direct negotiations with Iran; both sides are apparently pleased with how things are progressing. What is the goal of these talks? It is not peace, not justice, and certainly not about protecting the world from nuclear blackmail. No, the objective is to ensure that the snapback sanctions, the most powerful tool to constrain Iran, are not reimposed.

The EU3 powers — the UK, France, and Germany — are now saying that they might trigger the snapback sanctions – but only if Iran fails to “contain” its nuclear program by the end of August. That word — “contain” — is a political farce. What does “contain” even mean? ….[O]f course Iran will say, “Yes, we’ll contain it.” …. just long enough for the snapback sanctions deadline to expire.

This is classic Tehran. This is how the regime has always operated. Yet the European leaders are falling for it again — or more likely, choosing to fall for it: they want an excuse not to reimpose sanctions.

To be clear: the West has nothing to show for these negotiations; Iran has everything to gain. Iran gets to look “reasonable,” pocket more time, avoid sanctions, and wait for the clock to run out — after which the UN sanctions vanish forever….. Russia and China will never again agree to reimpose them through the UN Security Council. The European powers know this but clearly could not care less.

In reality, “contain” is nothing but a sanitized rebranding of the same failed JCPOA. The idea that Iran can “contain” its program means exactly what the JCPOA allowed: a laughable “honor system” — uranium enrichment, centrifuges spinning, and a countdown until Iran nearly reached breakout capability. This is not disarmament. This is a con. There needs to be zero enrichment, zero centrifuges and zero compromise. If the goal is nonproliferation, that is the only position that makes sense.

If Iran truly wants to prove that its intentions are peaceful, it can dismantle every element of its nuclear infrastructure — permanently. Anything less is just duplicity waiting to happen.

Europe’s moral compass has been replaced by a calculator and a gas pump. All they evidently care about is money — oil deals, luxury imports, sweetheart business contracts — with the same Iranian regime that hangs dissidents, murders women in the streets, and calls for genocide against Israel and the West, including Europe.

If the governments of the EU3 truly believed in human rights, regional security, or protecting its own backyard, they would have blocked the move. Instead, they did nothing. They stood by silently, allowing Iran to legally purchase and sell advanced weapons. Then, what did Iran do with its new freedom? It began arming Russia — the very country trying to invade Europe through Ukraine. The EU3 powers refused to stop Iran from becoming a weapons dealer for the Kremlin. This is not hypocrisy. This is a serious betrayal — of Europe’s own people, and of every Ukrainian citizen fighting against Russian tanks.

Let us call this what it is: treachery. Many officials within the European Union helped create the problem with Iran. They enabled the regime’s rise. They funded its resurgence. And now, just when the Iranian regime is cornered, they are riding in to save it once again. For money. For a surrender masquerading as “diplomacy”….

The snapback sanctions must be triggered immediately.

Europe’s leaders have chosen the wrong side of history before. Do not let them drag the rest of us down with them again.

While the United States and Israel have carried the backbreaking burden of confronting the Iranian regime’s nuclear threat with courage and real-world action, some European leaders have once again decided to play the coward’s role — not just by refusing to stand up to Iran, but by actively enabling it.

Trump’s Unknown Frontiers Trump is rewriting the rules of politics, economics, and culture—and no one, not even the experts, knows what happens when the old orthodoxy finally breaks. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/04/trumps-unknown-frontiers/

Donald Trump’s far-ranging counter-revolution, to quote the old Star Trek mission statement, seeks “To boldly go where no one has gone before.”

Because no conservative president has dared to question the last 70 years of progressive cultural, social, economic, and political dominance, all traditional wisdom, all our renowned “experts,” and all the self-described “authorities” have no real credibility in their mostly flawed analyses and wrong prognoses.

Read what our legacy media predicted in March for this summer’s economy, or in January for the future of the border, or what would happen should the U.S. Air Force enter Iranian airspace.

Take the border. “Comprehensive immigration reform” (a euphemism for rolling amnesties and a still-open border) was the establishment’s answer to 10,000 foreign nationals storming the border during peak surges of the Biden administration.

But no president had ever simultaneously 1) pressured Mexico to close its borders and patrol ours, 2) announced a plan to complete a border wall along the entire US-Mexico boundary, 3) stopped catch-and-release, 4) ceased refugee applications after illegally entering the U.S., 5) introduced policies encouraging voluntary self-deportation, and 6) prevented all illegal entries at the border.

The result is that we do not know the full effects of these combined border policies.

So far, one million foreign nationals have lost jobs, and 2 million Americans have gained them since Trump’s inauguration. How much money will be saved in local, state, and federal entitlements if illegal immigrants return home?

How much trauma and costs will be avoided if 500,000 criminal aliens are deported?

How many serious and lethal hit-and-run accidents will be prevented?

To what degree will the idea of citizenship be reenergized once it is not reduced to the equivalency of mere residence?

How many emergency rooms will have more space for U.S. citizens? No one knows, but the consequences could be enormous.

The murderous, thieving overlords of Hamas are the true oppressors of the Palestinians Colonel Richard Kemp

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/08/03/hamas-no-peace-israel-gaza-war-palestinian/

The terrorists are the true oppressors of Palestine, not the Israelis

Despite calls from the Arab League to disarm, Hamas says it refuses to do so until an independent Palestinian state is established. By that the terrorist group means it will never disarm, because it knows that no Palestinian state will ever be established. Certainly not the state they envisage, which is a far cry from the two-state solution that Starmer, Macron and Carney seem to have in mind. Hamas want a one-state solution, an Islamic State encompassing the entirety of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank. Hence their slogan “from the river to the sea”, mouthed incessantly on university campuses and the streets of our cities by uncomprehending hordes. Hamas’s founding charter demands the annihilation of Israel and the death of Jews everywhere. Despite a cosmetic “revision” and English language statements made to fool Westerners, this has never been repudiated and remains their unwavering goal.

The leadership of Hamas are vicious, bloodthirsty terrorists, many of them multi millionaires enriched by decades stealing aid meant for the people of Gaza. But they are far from being fools. They understand that Israel will never surrender to them and they will never have the military power to drive the Israelis out. Their best shot was October 7 in 2023, which was supposed to be supported by an invasion by Hezbollah from the north and backed by rocket fire from Iran’s other “ring of fire” terrorist proxies. They murdered, raped, tortured, kidnapped and burned but failed to achieve what they intended.

Instead their actions drove Gaza to ruin and decimated their own fighting strength. But they will fight on fanatically for as long as they are physically able to do so. Hamas is a miniature version of al-Qaeda. Like Hamas, Bin Laden sought an Islamic caliphate, but on a global scale. And like Hamas, he didn’t expect to achieve it in his life-time or even for generations. He saw his role as killing, destruction and economic damage. The purpose was to demoralise the West and “apostate” Muslim regimes, creating strife and division around the world until eventually the caliphate would be established.

Mamdani Wants Cops to Stop Responding to Attacks on Jews Zohran Mamdani is preparing to enable a new wave of antisemitic violence. by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/mamdani-wants-cops-to-stop-responding-to-attacks-on-jews/

Jews are the victims of the majority of hate crimes, especially religious hate crimes, in New York City.

Jews were targeted in 345 hate crimes in New York City last year, more than all other minority groups combined, according to NYPD data released on Monday.

Anti-Jewish crimes accounted for 54% of the 641 total hate crimes reported to police in the city in 2024, the data showed.

Since the beginning of the year, 74 (60%) of the 123 recorded hate crimes have targeted Jews, according to the NYPD.

Zohran Mamdani, the radical Islamist and leftist terrorist supporter, has proposed that the NYPD not respond to hate crimes, instead that they be handled by social workers.

This is not simply police defunding, rather this shifts resources away from responding to attacks on Jews, moves away from having law enforcement deal with those attacks and instead has his political leftist allies ‘deal’ with them by burying them.

This isn’t just a pro-crime policy. It’s strategically calculated to protect members of his community who attack Jews while exposing Jews to religiously motivated assaults.

Zohran Mamdani is already building the infrastructure for enabling a new wave of antisemitic violence.

So Much Winning — Voters Give Trump’s Leadership, Policies Strong Backing In August: I&I/TIPP Poll

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/08/04/so-much-winning-voters-give-trumps-leadership-policies-strong-backing-in-august-ii-tipp-poll/

While President Trump’s leadership style and policies both can at times be controversial even among his own GOP base, he continues to hold on tight to his solid overall favorability ratings among American voters, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll data show.

The national online I&I/TIPP Poll, taken by 1,362 voters from July 30-Aug. 1, show Trump holding steady, with 45% giving him a “favorable” rating, and an equal 45% giving him “unfavorable.” Another 6% answered “not familiar enough to say” while 4% were “not sure.” The poll’s margin of error of is +/-2.7 percentage points