RUTHFULLY YOURS

After September 11, 2001, the cream of European intellectuals immediately started to find justifications for Jihad. They evidently were fascinated by the Kalashnikov, “the weapon of the poor”. For them, what we had seen in New York was a chimera, an illusion. The mass killings were supposedly the suicide of the capitalist democracy and terrorism was the wrath of the unemployed, the disperate weapon of a lumpenproletariat offended by the arrogance of Western globalization. These intellectuals have sown seeds of despair in a large Western echo-chamber. From 9/11 to the recent massacres on European soil, the murdered Westerners were just the collateral victims in a war between “the system” and the damned of the earth, which only claim a place at the table.

One of these intellectuals is Michel Onfray. It is a while since we heard the expression: “Useful idiot”. It was cynically invented by Marshal Tito to designate Western sympathizers who justified the horrors of Communism. The French magazine L’Express used it for Onfray: “The useful idiot of Islamism“.

When his “Atheist Manifesto” was published in 2005, Michel Onfray could never have imagined that ten years later, he would become the darling of the Jihadist group, Islamic State. Yet, on November 21, 2015, a week after the massacres in Paris, Onfray appeared in a propaganda video of the Islamic State. A few days later, Onfray, this idol of the reflexive European middle class, said that a “truce could be signed between Isis and France“.

Michel Onfray just gave another interview to the magazine Famille Chrétienne, where he explained that there is no moral difference between “killing innocent lives of women, children and elderly” and “state terrorism”, between Isis and the Western war on terror.

Michel Onfray is the most widely read French philosopher in the world and has dethroned Michel Serres, Michel Foucault and Jean-Paul Sartre. This philosopher, drunk with the Enlightenment, has written 80 books, translated into nearly 30 languages. He is not a Marxist, but a libertarian hedonist. According to Mr. Onfray, the entire Judeo-Christian heritage prevents free, loving enjoyment. Hence his insistence, ultimately, that the Western civilization is “dead” (he is writing a book entitled, “Décadence”).

How did the great hedonist, the theorist of materialism and atheism, become the darling of Islamist cutthroats? Prime Minister Manuel Valls charged him with having “lost the compass“. If Onfray calls for a truce with the Islamic State, it is because he believes that France is responsible for what happened to itself. The thesis that Onfray recently repeated in the book “Penser l’islam“: “If we look at the historical facts and not at the emotions, the West attacked first”. France is supposedly reaping what it has sown. … Of course Islamists kill and massacre, but it is not their fault as the West, in his view, previously attacked them.

Onfray also gave the impression of finding more excuses for Isis by indicating a French “Islamophobia“. Why has Onfray has become so popular among the French foreign fighters? Journalist David Thomson, a specialist in jihadi movements, explained that “Onfray is translated into Arabic and shared on all pro-Isis sites“. Talking to Jean-Jacques Bourdin in 2013, Onfray even defended the right of Islamists to apply Sharia law in Mali.

Onfray recognizes that we are at war. But this war, to him, was was started by George W. Bush. He “forgets” that there were 3,000 American deaths on September 11, 2001. If you remind him that “Isis kills innocent people”, the philosopher will reply: “We have also killed innocent people“. It is the perfect moral equality between Isis and the West. Barbarians against barbarians! The 130 French killed on November 13, 2015 are just puppets of the West. With his moral relativism, Onfray opens the door to Islamist cutthroats.

Onfray belongs to a long list of charlatans who abound among Europe’s intellectuals. Writing for Le Monde, the most famous German philosopher, Jürgen Habermas, claimed that “jihadism is a modern form of reaction to the living conditions characterized by uprooting”. Someone should have explained to him that all the terrorists were well integrated in the French and Belgian democracies, and living with welfare subsidies.

Another celebrity-philosopher, the neo-Marxist guru Slavoj Zizek, argued that Islamism may seem reactionary, but “in a curious inversion religion is one of the possible places from which one can deploy critical doubts about today’s society. It has become one of the sites of resistance”. Zizek also claimed that “Islamo-Fascists” and “European anti-immigrant racists” are “the two sides of the same coin”.

The French intellectual Thomas Piketty, after the massacres in Paris, pointed at “inequality” as the root of Isis’ success. Another well known German philosopher, Peter Sloterdijk, claimed that the September 11 attacks were attacks have been just “small incidents“.

Nobel Prize for Literature laureate, José Saramago, claimed that hurling two planes into the Twin Towers was “the revenge against the humiliation”. There were those, like the French thinker Jean Baudrillard, who said that the attacks on the Twin Towers were wanted by the United States. In short, Islamic terrorists did it, but we had intimately wanted it. Or to quote from the famous German composer Karlheinz Stockhausen, the attack on the World Trade Center was “the greatest work of art that is possible in the whole cosmos“.

The peak of cynicism was reached by Dario Fo, the winner of the 1997 Nobel Prize for literature, who said after 9/11: “The great speculators (of American capitalism) wallow in an economy that every years kills tens of millions of people with poverty (in the Third World) — so what is 20,000 dead in New York? Regardless of who carried out the massacre (of 9-11), this violence is the legitimate daughter of the culture of violence, hunger and inhumane exploitation”.

It happened before. Philosophers such as Martin Heidegger and Carl Schmitt, writers such as Knut Hamsun and Louis Ferdinand Céline, musicians such as Wilhelm Furtwangler and Ernst von Karajan, are just some of the most famous representatives of European culture who embraced Adolf Hitler’s dream. Their heirs now justify Jihad as the ultimate punishment for the Western freedoms and democracy.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.