YISRAEL MEDAD: “INVENTIVISM” IN THEIR OWN WORDS *****
http://myrightword.blogspot.com/2011/12/more-on-palestinian-inventivism.html
Not “inventiveness” but now: “inventivism” *.
Here:
THE PALESTINIAN NATIONAL LIBERATION MOVEMENT emerged in the early 1960s with the primary goal of “liberating the land and the people” from Zionist settler-colonialism. Today, with colonization accelerating throughout Palestine and with Palestinian refugees—mostly deprived of their national, civil, and human rights—still dispersed around the world, this aim sounds like an embarrassing echo of a distant past [1]. The failure of the strategy of armed struggle to deliver its maximalist (pre-1967) or even more limited (post-1988) goals became patently clear with the quelling of the second intifada. Meanwhile, the alternate strategy of seeking to liberate a fraction of historical Palestine by negotiations and diplomacy has proven equally futile.
“emerged in the early 1960s”? “pre-1967 armed struggle”?
But we know this movement is ancient, old, no? And we know the “settlements” cause the terror.
That’s what they tell us.
Who wrote that?
Raja Khalidi and Sobhi Samour.
Who is Raja?
He’s Chief, Office of the Director, Division on Globalisationa and Developmen Strategies, Geneva.
And Sobhi?
He’s a Ph.D. candidate in economics at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Oh. Arabs? “Palestinians”?
And where did they publish that?
The Journal of the Institute for Palestine Studies (IPS), an institute exclusively devoted to documentation, research, analysis, and publication on Palestinian affairs and the Arab-Israeli conflict. It is an academic organization dedicated to protecting the integrity of the historical record. IPS is looked upon as the major source of accurate information and analysis on Palestinian affairs and the Arab-Israeli conflict.
Oh.
__________
* There is, in literature, this:
Dr. Mezu’s theory is “Creative Inventivism”… The will and ability to make a way out of no way – the capability of taking a mess, a wall, a bottomless pit, and constructing a rope, a ladder, a bridge across the expanse of impossibility… a future out of hopelessness, oppression, and submission.
The term has been used in theological philosophy:
biblical absolutes, as opposed to modern worldviews, such as liberalism, modernism, humanism and inventivism.
and clearer, here:
For Simondon’s thought to resonate, constructivism has to make room for an integral inventivism (if such a word exists). An inventivism that is not afraid of nature and its [own] creativity.
And it’s been used in reference to Nietzsche:
if you want to know why not identity or sameness can be found by Deleuze in these operation of the intellect…the problem so is to MAKE the connections when identity is seen as illusion of the ‘megamachine’. between disparate differencial flowing elementary objects of desires, AND illusions of the intellect as blockers starting to run loose out of human mind origins. [inventivism of passions].
“Constructivism” is a term, actually, that has been applied to Jewish nationalism. But I’ll get to that later.
^
Comments are closed.
