RUTHFULLY YOURS

The Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) is not Islamic, announced Barack Obama, during a White House Summit on Countering Violent Extremism (with an emphasis on violence inspired by the Judeo-Christian tradition). “They [ISIS] are not religious leaders, they are terrorists,” he asserted—an assertion that begs the question, as it assumes that a terrorist cannot be a religious leader as well.

President Obama further ventured that when we call them “Islamic,” we grant ISIS the “legitimacy” for which they thirst. For they are “desperate to portray themselves as religious leaders, holy warriors in defense of Islam.” Yet another non sequitur: Christening the group Islamic or not is unlikely to change that its members and a good many Muslims across the Ummah regard ISIS as thoroughbred Islamic.

What else did Imam Obama – who professes Christianity – proclaim in the name of the ISIS Islamic eschatology? Obama claimed that ISIS has “perverted the religion [of Islam]” and that it is peddling a “twisted ideology used to incite others to violence.”

The Psychology of Left-Wing Jews — on The Glazov Gang
Three Jewish thinkers reflect on the reasons why.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/frontpagemag-com/the-psychology-of-left-wing-jews-on-the-glazov-gang/

How does a government “get beyond the crisis” without a plan to resolve the crisis?

The Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) is an odd document, not yet debated Congress. Among other points, it prohibits “enduring offensive ground operations,” but without defining them.

President Obama seems to want it both ways — to oppose American participation in large-scale battles in Iraq, but to have the “flexibility” to order them; to prohibit ground operations but to have American troops in place to carry them out.

The administration thus appears to remain without an articulated strategy to prosecute the war IS launched against us, our allies and a broad range of civilian non-combatants.

Wisconsin governor Scott Walker took another step toward a White House bid, hiring Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffer Mike Gallagher and DCI Group director and Capitol Hill veteran Kristin Jackson to lead his foreign- and domestic-policy teams, respectively. In that role, Gallagher will serve as the day-to-day lead on all foreign-policy issues, working to bring outside experts before the governor for briefings and to develop the governor’s foreign-policy platform. Jackson will do the same on the domestic-policy front. A spokeswoman for Our American Revival, Walker’s political-action committee and campaign in waiting, confirmed the hires.

70 years ago this past weekend, the Royal Air Force destroyed the city of Dresden and killed about 25,000 of its inhabitants. The exact number was impossible to determine, and Josef Goebbels, Hitler’s skilled minister of propaganda, immediately claimed that an atrocity had occurred, with at least a hundred thousand victims. Ever since, the Left has liked to maintain that whatever the Nazis did, the bombing of Dresden shows that the Allies were just as bad, or worse. In the course of extensive unfavorable coverage of the anniversary, the BBC naturally condemned the bombing as a war crime. In a ceremony in Dresden, Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury no less, said that the bombing “diminished all our humanity” and left him with “a profound feeling of regret and deep sorrow.” While he was apologizing for victory in the war against Nazism, Islamic State killers were beheading 21 Christians in Libya, in a current war about which he has nothing to say, so he may well find himself having to make a genuine apology in the future. Also naturally on this occasion, no mention was made of Frederick W. Taylor’s definitive 2004 book Dresden, which explains that Stalin had requested the bombing of Dresden’s strategic railhead as it brought reinforcements to the Wehrmacht, and which furthermore exposes Goebbels’s manipulations.

Obama and European leaders are repeating the mistakes of their 1930s predecessors. World War II was the most destructive war in history. What caused it? The panic from the ongoing and worldwide Depression in the 1930s had empowered extremist movements the world over. Like-minded, violent dictators of otherwise quite different Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Imperial Japan, and the Communist Soviet Union all wanted to attack their neighbors. Yet World War II could have been prevented had Western Europe united to deter Germany. Instead, France, Britain, and the smaller European democracies appeased Hitler. The United States turned isolationist. The Soviet Union collaborated with the Third Reich. And Italy and Japan eventually joined it. The 1930s saw rampant anti-Semitism. Jews were blamed in fascist countries for the economic downturn. They were scapegoated in democracies for stirring up the fascists. The only safe havens for Jews from Europe were Jewish-settled Palestine and the United States. Does all this sound depressingly familiar? The aftershocks of the global financial meltdown of 2008 still paralyze the European Union while prompting all sorts of popular extremist movements and opportunistic terrorists. After the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, America has turned inward.

You’re reading a post for Preparedness Week, a weeklong series of blogs about disaster and emergency preparation inspired by the launch of Freedom Academy’s newest e-book, Surviving the End: A Practical Guide for Everyday Americans in the Age of Terror by James Jay Carafano, Ph.D. You can download the e-book exclusively at the PJ Store here.

One of the major issues of our time has to do with the status of Islamic terror. Is it something that should fill us with fear and panic, distract us from the ordinary affairs of life and prompt us to cede extraordinary powers of preventative surveillance to government? Or, indeed, to take the concrete measures outlined in terrorism expert James Jay Carafano’s new book Surviving the End: A Practical Guide for Everyday Americans in the Age of Terror (of which, more later). Or is it merely another of those unpredictable disruptions and upheavals that happen along life’s road, deplorable, certainly, but inevitable, that we should come to terms with and go on conducting business as usual? In light of the recent murderous assault at a free speech symposium organized by Swedish artist Lars Vilks in Copenhagen, followed by an attack on a Copenhagen synagogue, we will no doubt once again hear cautions that we must not over-react to Islamic terror.

WASHINGTON — President Obama gave a lengthy defense of the administration’s policy to not link Islam to terrorism, telling the summit on Countering Violent Extremism this afternoon that “no religion is responsible for terrorism; people are responsible for violence and terrorism.”

He gave as examples of extremism the 1994 Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, the Fort Hood massacre, the Boston Marathon bombings, and “horrific acts of violence at a Sikh temple near Milwaukee or at a Jewish community center outside Kansas City.”

“Most recently, with the brutal murders in Chapel Hill of three young Muslim Americans, many Muslim Americans are worried and afraid. And I want to be as clear as I can be, as Americans all faiths and backgrounds, we stand with you in your grief and we offer our love and we offer our support,” Obama told the crowd in the South Court auditorium.

Radical Islam is escalating a campaign of murder, beheadings, kidnappings, torture, the burning of churches and the targeting of Christians for extermination. In his recent speech at a prayer breakfast, U.S. President Barack Obama told those who would criticize such actions to get off their high horse because of the crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and Jim Crow in the United States. Dennis Prager called this “moral idiocy,” and more of the same is now appearing.

Consider “Flowers to remember: Honoring Japanese Americans and Armenians,” by David Mas Masumoto in the February 15 Sacramento Bee subtitled “Never to forget atrocities against Japanese and Armenians.” Masumoto is a UC Berkeley grad, peach farmer, author of Wisdom of the Last Farmer, and a nominee for the James Beard Award for Writing and Literature. He draws a parallel between U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s internment of Japanese Americans, launched by Executive Order 9066 on February 19, 1942, and the Turkish effort to exterminate the Armenians in 1915, during the First World War.

“We can not win this war by killing them,” Marie Harf said on MSNBC.

Reversing thousands of years of battlefield experience in which wars were won by “killing them,” the State Department spokeswoman argued that you can’t defeat ISIS by killing its fighters.

“We can not kill our way out of this war,” she said. “We need in the medium and longer term to go after the root causes that lead people to join these groups, whether it is lack of opportunity for jobs.”

War is one of the few things in life we can reliably kill our way out of. The United States has had a great track record of killing our way out of wars. We killed our way out of WW1. We killed our way out of WW2. The problem began when we stopped trying to kill our way out of wars and started trying to hug our way out of wars instead. Progressive academics added war to economics, terrorism and the climate in the list of subjects they did not understand and wanted to make certain that no one else was allowed to understand. Because the solution to war is so obvious that no progressive could possibly think of it.