Charles Lipson Jimmy Kimmel is back But let the public – not the FCC – decide what to watch

https://thespectator.com/topic/jimmy-kimmel-is-back/

Jimmy Kimmel’s broadcast has made a lot more news off the air than on it. The latest is that ABC will resume the show Tuesday night and that some 400 Hollywood celebrities have signed a petition supporting their friend. Stop the presses! Today’s celebrities support leftist politics! So does ABC’s corporate parent, Disney, the folks who lost a fortune by remaking Snow White as a progressive wet dream.

It would be a cruel joke to add, “If another 53 celebrity’s sign up to support Kimmel, his audience will double.” Actually, he will get a lot of viewers on his first night back. After that, viewers will remember why they didn’t watch.

The joke about Kimmel’s small audience may be cruel, but it captures two points. One is that Kimmel’s audience, like that of his mainstream peers, is a shriveled replica of Johnny Carson’s huge numbers. The second is that celebrity culture, represented by those 400 signatures, is badly out-of-touch with a broad swath of the American public and clueless about the most important lesson in marketing: don’t insult your audience. When you do that, the audience walks away, as they have from Miller Lite beer, Jaguar cars, and Cracker Barrel restaurants.

It’s even dumber to alienate your viewing audience when the media environment is as tough as it is today. With the internet and stream content, the market has grown more and more fragmented. As it has, the profitability of late-night shows has shrunk. Their traditional format has also grown stale. After the host finishes a short monologue, he sits behind a desk and talks with one guest at a time. The guests are familiar faces, fresh from Botox, promoting their latest ventures.

With this reduced viewership and dull format comes reduced profitability. The only winner has been a show with a different format and a different political angle. Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld is funny and snarky, but he never takes himself too seriously. He sits in a circle of chairs, talking with a group of guests, some of them regulars, some new for that episode. The goal, which has been wildly successful, is to draw in younger, more conservative viewers, who already like Fox News, and, according to polling, are shifting from Democrat to Republican.

Gutfeld, unlike Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, is performing on a conservative cable channel, not a mainstream network meant to appeal to all viewpoints across a wide demographic. Kimmel and Colbert seem to have missed the point, turning their mainstream broadcast slots into tendentious political platforms, mimicking MSNBC and CNN just as those cable networks were imploding.

Kimmel and Colbert’s decision to alienate half their potential audience is far different from the older, blander days of late-night talk shows, when the hosts poked gentle fun at both sides. Their goal was to appeal to the Upper Midwest as well as the Upper East Side and to provide calming entertainment to a broad national audience as they eased into bedtime. It’s not rocket science, and they knew it.

No one understood this logic better than Johnny Carson, by-far the most successful late-night host of all time. “Tell me the last time that Jack Benny, Red Skelton, any comedian, used his show to do serious issues. That’s not what I’m there for. Can’t they see that?” he told CBS’ Mike Wallace in 1979. “It’s a real danger. Once you start that, you start to get that self-important feeling.”

When Jordan’s Arab Legion seized half of Jerusalem Daniel Greenfield

https://www.jns.org/liberating-our-jerusalem/

Written in 1922

When Jordan’s Arab Legion seized half of Jerusalem, drove out its Jewish population and illegally annexed the city– the only entity to recognize the annexation was the United Kingdom which had provided the mercenary officers and the training that made the conquest possible. Officers like Colonel Bill Newman, Major Geoffrey Lockett and Major Bob Slade, under Glubb Pasha, better known as General John Bagot Glubb, whose son later converted to Islam, invaded Jerusalem and used the Muslim gangs under their command to make the partition and occupation of Jerusalem possible.

The Jews living in the free half of Jerusalem continued to be killed by Jordanian Muslim snipers. The victims of those years of Muslim occupation included Yaffa Binyamin, a 14-year-old girl sitting on the balcony of her own house and a Christian carpenter working on the Notre Dame Convent.

Under Muslim occupation, while Muslim snipers were cold-bloodedly murdering their children, the Jewish residents living under fire couldn’t so much as put in an outhouse without being reported to the UN for illegal construction. In one case a corrupt UN observer organization held four meetings to discuss an outhouse for local residents before condemning Israel for illegal construction.

It did not however condemn Jordan when one of its soldiers opened fire on a train wounding another Jewish teenage girl.

Not very much has changed.

The hysterical condemnations of “illegal construction” did not end when the Muslim occupation did. The great outhouse of the United Nations and the smaller outhouses of the foreign ministries of countries whose leaders tremble whenever Muslims grow agitated over a cartoon or a YouTube video fill the air with the vilest of falsehoods whenever a Jewish family moves into a home in Jewish ancestral Jerusalem – the eternal Jewish city founded 3,000 years earlier by King David.

THOUGHT OF THE DAY: ISRAEL’S DILEMMA BY SYDNEY WILLIAMS

In Hamlet, (Act 1, Scene 4) Marcellus, after seeing the ghost of the murdered king, says: “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.” In my opinion, something is rotten among Western nations – theoretically enlightened individuals and governments – in their attitude toward Israel, a country, a democracy, that is trying to survive almost […]

Qatar’s Arab-Islamic Summit: Hypocrites and Cowards by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21918/qatar-arab-islamic-summit

Israel’s airstrike in Doha was directed against Hamas leaders, not Qatar. There is no reason why the leaders of a terrorist organization, responsible for murdering thousands of Israelis and Palestinians, should feel safe anywhere.

The war could have ended long ago had Hamas agreed to release the hostages, whom it should not have seized in the first place, lay down its weapons, and relinquish control over the Gaza Strip.

Such a celebration could not have taken place without the approval of Qatar’s rulers. Qatar’s media especially Al-Jazeera, to this day, have been enthusiastically praising Hamas’s attacks, as well.

Qatar is not – and has never pretended to be – a democracy that respects and protects free speech and public freedoms. If Qatar’s rulers were unhappy with the actions and presence of Hamas’s leaders in their country, they would have stopped them or deported them long ago. The country’s rulers, the Al Thani family… have placed Al-Jazeera at their disposal to spread their threatening and radical Islamist ideology. Much of it is based on eliminating Israel through Jihad.

Notably, several Arab countries, including Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Egypt decided in 2017 to cut their diplomatic relations with Qatar because it supports terrorism and extremist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. These countries issued a list of 13 demands, one of which, most prominently, was shutting down Al-Jazeera.

Qatar is reportedly working to create a second Arab Spring to topple Egypt’s government once again.

Since the beginning of the Israel-Hamas war, the network [Al-Jazeera] has banned any criticism of Hamas.

In December 2024, even the Palestinian Authority, after accusing Al-Jazeera of broadcasting misleading reports and stoking divisions among the Palestinians, decided to ban Al-Jazeera in the West Bank.

By failing to denounce Hamas and call on it to lay down its weapons and cede control of the Gaza Strip, the Arab and Islamic leaders actually sent a message to the terror group that it is right to continue its Jihad against Israel.

It would have been more helpful had the Arab and Islamic leaders once again issued an appeal to Qatar to stop supporting Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

The reason Arab and Islamic leaders did not condemn Hamas is because they are afraid that Qatar will use Al-Jazeera to incite violence and terrorism against their regimes.

Some of these leaders, in addition, including the United States, seem to be afraid of alienating a wealthy country such as Qatar.

Why Our Systems Collapse When merit is replaced with ideology, fires rage unchecked, killers walk free, and fragile systems collapse—leaving lives and cities in ruin. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/22/why-our-systems-collapse/

America has a lot of built-in safety backups and redundancies.

But every once in a while, when tradition, science, time-tested protocols, and common sense are ignored, a fragile system utterly collapses.

Usually, an iconic event reveals how vulnerable the entire country has become, and predictably occurs when suicidal ideologies and nihilism, in perfect-storm fashion, wreak havoc.

The media, academia, the bureaucracy, and higher education can mask the dangers of their political agendas—at least until their sheer incompetence or toxicity can no longer be hidden or excused, and a predictable disaster ensues.

Take the January 4-5, 2025, Pacific Palisades fire that destroyed an entire historic neighborhood of Los Angeles. The embers had not even cooled when we were lectured that “climate change” was responsible for the historically predictable annual autumn and early winter Santa Ana winds that whip up horrific fires before the first winter rains arrive—a phenomenon documented for over two centuries.

The media, in reporting the conflagration, downplayed human culpability. But over the next few weeks, outraged former homeowners and independent journalists began cataloging the real symptoms of a total system failure that turned the normal end-of-year fire season into a catastrophic inferno.

A lot of things had to go wrong to utterly destroy an ancient, coveted neighborhood. But DEI managed to do all of that with ease.

First, we learned that the incompetent mayor, Karen Bass, had cut the fire budget. Then, despite warnings of dry hillsides, underfunded fire protection, and predicted high winds, Bass was nowhere to be seen during the most dangerous weeks of the year.

Why? She was junketing in Ghana, an African nation rarely considered vital to the running of the third-largest city in the United States.

The now-convicted felon, Deputy Mayor Brian Thompson, was under house arrest for phoning in a bomb threat to the city hall. So a mayoral apparatus did not exist.

Next, the clueless and vastly overpaid Janisse Quiñones, the CEO and Chief Engineer of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, was likely hired based on diversity, equity, and inclusion criteria despite a prior uninspiring record in her administrative roles at PG&E. She was utterly unprepared for the fire.

The Left Contrives Its Own Reality on Political Violence By Becket Adams

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/the-left-contrives-its-own-reality-on-political-violence/

The sanctimonious calls for unity are a little hard to take.

In the days following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, members of the Democratic Party and the press have complained that the right is not doing more to promote unity.

Unity would be nice, sure. You first.

“At moments like this, when tensions are high, then part of the job of the president is to pull people together,” former President Barack Obama told an audience last week.

“Whether we’re Democrats, Republicans, independents, we have to recognize that on both sides, undoubtedly, there are people who are extremists and who say things that are contrary to what I believe are America’s core values,” he said. “But I will say that those extreme views were not in my White House. I wasn’t embracing them. I wasn’t empowering them. I wasn’t putting the weight of the United States government behind extremist views. And that . . . when we have the weight of the United States government behind extremist views, we’ve got a problem.”

Obama then said, “My view was that part of the role of the presidency is to constantly remind us of the ties that bind us together.”

That he may sincerely believe those words would be laughable were it not the modus operandi of the Democratic Party and its media allies to invent alternate realities in which their people are forever the heroic and faultless champions of lofty ideals.

The Obama White House, alas, did not represent bipartisan comity. His administration was hardly respectful toward all viewpoints or mindful of constitutional rights. The Obama White House used the Espionage Act against U.S. reporters who refused to give up their sources, it secretly obtained phone records from the Associated Press, it oversaw a weaponized IRS that targeted conservative groups, and it turned the entire intelligence apparatus against the 2016 GOP presidential nominee.

We’re talking here about President “I want you to argue with them and get in their face” Obama, who, at a memorial service in 2016 for five murdered police officers, chose to scold law enforcement, saying, “With an open heart, police departments will acknowledge that, just like the rest of us, they are not perfect; that insisting we do better to root out racial bias is not an attack on cops, but an effort to live up to our highest ideals.” (Give the man credit: At least he managed something less glib than “acted stupidly.”)

How does one achieve unity with a man who lives in a fantasy land, where his opponents are the only ones responsible for political division? This goes well beyond just one man’s delusions and high self-regard; it’s a party-wide problem.

An especially loathsome example involves the tragic killing of former Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband, State Senator John Hoffman. Many on the left insist they were the victims of right-wing political extremism — except that the man who allegedly murdered the couple appears to be an insane person, not an ideologically motivated assassin.

The Green Road to Ruin Gabriel Moens and John McRobert

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/doomed-planet/the-green-road-to-ruin/

By any standard, the increasingly frenzied activity on the climate frontlines is staggering. Australia is waiting on a decision by the United Nations to hold COP31 in Adelaide in November 2026. Australia’s application aims at displaying its global leadership in implementing a costly and futile program to replace the utilisation of fossil fuels with the deceptively named ‘renewable’ energy solar cells and wind turbines that are anything but clean or green in their implementation and operation.

On Thursday, September 18, 2025, the Prime Minister announced the government’s emissions reduction target of between 62 and 70 per cent by 2035. The government described the target as both ‘ambitious and achievable, sensible and serious.’[1] The setting of this target indicates that Australia’s climate gurus fail to understand  that human recycling of carbon dioxide as ‘emissions’ are not harmful to the planet, but are beneficial in both returning some of a life-supporting, vital trace gas back into an atmosphere that has been seriously depleted from much higher levels over millennia, and that the vast quantities of cheaply accessed, stored energy has allowed mankind wherewithal to live with endless cycles of feast and famine resulting from natural cyclical climate change.

This announcement comes just a few days after the release of a report by the Australian Climate Service, entitled Australia’s National Climate Risk Assessment (Report).[2] The purpose of the Report is ‘to provide insights on how climate risk affects different sectors and regions of the country.’ [3] The government is boasting that 254 “experts” worked on the document, suggesting that this impressive number of scientists must necessarily translate into quality and reliable predictions about the impact of climate change.

This Report is a deeply flawed document that fails to discuss the effects of carbon dioxide objectively and impartially on the climate. It states that ‘Expansion of forest area typically removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and thus dampens global warming (IPCC, 2023)’.[4] This is demonstratively untrue, and any policy in favour of attempting to decarbonise a carbon and energy rich planet fails to acknowledge that the more carbon dioxide, the greener the planet!

But, more importantly, the Report assumes that the science of climate change is settled and that any doubts are odious examples of climate scepticism. Such a view is regrettable because the science is certainly not settled. We know more about the surface of the Moon than the bathymetry of the oceans that cover 70% of the globe whose surface temperatures govern local weather patterns in La Nina and El Nino Ocean current, cyclical occurrences, outside the room-control of mere mortals.

The Report is a hollow and result-oriented document. In uncritically assuming that the climate change cry is a real and unassailable proposition, it fails to address several critical issues, for example, does carbon dioxide really contribute to global warming?

President Trump’s Resolve to ‘Never Forget’ Trump may end up being the man to create a new reality in the Middle East. by Spencer Brown

https://www.frontpagemag.com/president-trumps-resolve-to-never-forget/

America’s promise to never forget Sept. 11 is primarily, but not exclusively, about remembering the 2,977 innocents murdered nearly a quarter century ago on an otherwise perfect September morning. In addition to keeping the victims’ memories alive and honoring the heroism of first responders in Manhattan, at the Pentagon, and aboard United 93, not forgetting also means recalling who attacked and how such an operation was pulled off to avoid the specter of repeating one of the darkest days in America’s history.

In hindsight, there were significant failures across the government that spanned political parties and presidents, stretching back to the waning days of the Cold War, when few, if any, Americans knew the names al Qaeda or Osama bin Laden, and most, instead, were fearing Soviet nukes and mutually assured destruction.

The threat of a radical Islamist attack on the homeland was there, however, and the pieces — namely the fanatics who carried out the hijackings, the funders who enabled the plot, and even the strategy itself — were falling into place decades earlier.

The book “Ghost Wars” by Steve Coll focuses on the U.S. government’s, primarily the CIA’s, actions from the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan to Sept. 10, 2001, providing an illuminating and jarring account of where many things went wrong. To better understand how the age of terrorism came to be, Jack Carr’s “Targeted: Beirut” is a meticulous and gripping retelling of the 1983 Marine Barracks bombing that, now looking back, marked one of the earliest attacks in what became the War on Terror that dominated the lives of the 9/11 generation.

Reading those books outside the time their stories take place makes it seem obvious where problems arose and contributed to the shock of Sept. 11, 2001. Yet, if they’re so obvious now, why have some of those mistakes-turned-warnings not been consistently heeded?

The damage done during four years of President Autopen was evident in real time — warnings for border agents to stay alert for Islamic terrorists inspired by Hamas barbarians’ Oct. 7 attack on Israel, numerous Biden administration officials testifying to Congress about how all the alarms were flashing red — yet course was not changed.

The Left’s Reaction to Jimmy Kimmel’s Firing Is Funnier Than He Ever Was

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/22/the-lefts-reaction-to-jimmy-kimmels-firing-is-funnier-than-he-ever-was/

It’s been amusing to watch the left’s reaction to ABC giving the boot to Jimmy Kimmel.

Not because of their rank hypocrisy when it comes to censorship. Or their claim that firing a low-rated late-night “comic” means “authoritarianism has arrived.” Or the fact that they are far more outraged that Kimmel lost his time slot than that Charlie Kirk lost his life over things they said.

What’s most amusing is how blissfully ignorant they are about how the news and entertainment industry works these days.

First, let’s dispense with the censorship ruse. ABC is a private company and is entitled to hire or fire whomever it wants. Networks do this all the time, usually without a peep of protest.

Last year, CBS fired veteran reporter Catherine Herridge – and seized her belongings – for unknown reasons. (She’d been investigating the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.) Also in 2024, NBC News fired former Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel shortly after hiring her as a commentator. There was no handwringing about the death of democracy.

If Kimmel’s ratings hadn’t been in the toilet, the network might have been willing to put up with his flagrant lying about Kirk’s alleged assassin, and his plan to double down on that lie the next night. ABC decided he wasn’t worth the hassle.

Rewarding Terror: Israel slams UK, Canada, Australia for recognizing ‘State of Palestine’ By Greg Richter

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/09/rewarding_terror_israel_slams_uk_canada_australia_for_recognizing_state_of_palestine.html

The United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia have formally recognized a Palestinian state, declaring the move necessary to revive a two-state solution and curb the bloodshed in Gaza. But to Israel and its supporters, the recognition amounts to nothing less than a reward for terrorism.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a blunt rebuke:

“I have a clear message to those leaders who recognise a Palestinian state after the horrific massacre of October 7: You are giving a huge reward to terrorism.
And I have another message for you: It will not happen. A Palestinian state will not be established west of the Jordan River.”

Israeli officials note that recognizing Palestinian statehood without dismantling Hamas, freeing hostages, and imposing meaningful security guarantees undermines Israel’s survival. One coalition member called it “an absurd prize for terrorism” and urged Israel to “remove the foolish idea of a Palestinian state from the agenda forever.”

Meanwhile, the three leaders presented their decision as a moral imperative. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared:

“Today, to revive the hope of peace for the Palestinians and Israelis, and a two-state solution, the United Kingdom formally recognises the State of Palestine.”

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney offered a similar justification:

“Canada recognises the State of Palestine and offers our partnership in building the promise of a peaceful future for both the State of Palestine and the State of Israel.”