Mamdani’s False Charge of Israeli ‘Apartheid’ And he’s getting away with his outrageous lies. by Hugh Fitzgerald

https://www.frontpagemag.com/mamdanis-false-charge-of-israeli-apartheid-2/

When New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani accuses Israel of “apartheid,” he is ignoring the fact that in Israel, there is no distinction in the civil and political rights enjoyed by Jews and Arabs. Arabs serve on the Supreme Court, sit in the Knesset, go abroad as diplomats representing Israel. Until recently, the head of Israel’s largest bank, the Bank Leumi, was an Arab. Jews and Arabs work together in offices and factories. Jewish and Arab medical personnel treat Jews and Arabs in the same hospitals. Jews and Arabs play in the same orchestras, and on the same sports teams. Jews and Arabs start businesses together, everything from restaurants to high-tech start-ups. There is only one difference in the treatment of Jews and Arabs in Israel: Jews must, while Arabs may, serve in the military. When  makes his outrageous remarks, either his political rivals or journalists should question him at once, prepared to hold his claims up to critical inspection. So far, even as they denounce him for his charges against Israel, including his most outrageous charge, that the IDF is committing “genocide,” they have failed to state exactly why those charges are baseless. More on Mamdani’s charges can be found here: “Mamdani says he’ll recognize Israel ‘not as Jewish state,’ claims genocide in Gaza during debate,” Jerusalem Post, October 17, 2025:

“I want to be very clear that the occupation is a reference to international law and the violation of it, which Mr. Cuomo has no regard for since he signed up to be Benjamin Netanyahu’s legal defense team during the course of this genocide,” Mamdani said.

There was no “occupation” of Gaza on October 6. The IDF entered Gaza on October 7 to destroy Hamas in a war for Israel’s survival. That does not constitute an “occupation.” Mamdani claims that by fighting in Gaza against a terror group that murdered 1,200 people, almost all of them Israelis, Israel is “violating” international law. There is no “international law” that forbids a country from striking back at an enemy that has murdered its citizens. Think of the American attack deep inside Pakistan to kill Osama Bin Laden.

Mamdani Incites Muslim Rage and Resentment Against the United States Playing the victim card all the way into the mayor’s office. by Jason D. Hill

https://www.frontpagemag.com/mamdani-incites-muslim-rage-and-resentment-against-the-united-states/

In what at first glance seems to be nothing more than just a saccharine, sentimental display of performed outrage and feigning victimhood, Zohran Mamdani, the New York City Mayoral candidate slated to become the Big Apple’s first Muslim mayor, instead pitched a dangerous performance that can only be described as a subtle incitement to elicit Muslim rage and resentment against the United States of America.

In an address to his constituents on Friday, October 24, Mamdani listed a tearful bevy of indignities that Muslims faced in America in the wake of the Islamic attack against the United States on September 11, 2001. He emotionally recalled how his late aunt was fearful of wearing her hijab on the New York subway for fear of reprisals. He was happy his mosque was not burnt to the ground, but he complained that to be a Muslim in New York was to suffer endless indignities.

He bemoaned the fact that not every Muslim in New York was treated the same as every other New Yorker. He claimed that Muslims lived in the shadows, that they had been asked to settle for less, and forced to settle for whatever little they received. Specifically addressing his fellow Muslims in the audience, he asked them if they would remain in the shadows or step into the light.

In what can only be described as hyperbolic defiance, he listed the number of days remaining until the Mayoral election and then stated: I will not change who I am, how I eat, or practice the faith I am proud to call my own.”

And further: “I will be a Muslim man each of those days.”

Let us begin with the last the last proclamation, that he will be a Muslim man for each of those days. What is the fundamental intention of a mayoral candidate who is supposed to be representing the residents of New York City regardless of their race, religious creed, ethnicity, or any personal identity they align with in making such a declaration? What is his message?

There’s Just One Deadly Sin For Today’s Democrats-Crossing the Party Line

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/28/the-democrats-moral-compass-points-nowhere/

It has been somewhat amusing to watch Democrats twist themselves into pretzels to justify their continued support for miscreants and reprobates, while still trying to claim the moral high ground when it comes to President Donald Trump.

In the span of just one week, we’ve seen them rush to defend a Senate candidate, Graham Platner, who didn’t just sport a Nazi tattoo on his chest, but a tattoo of a skull favored by guards at Nazi concentration camps. A guy who spouted anti-gay slurs on social media.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, speaking for all Democrats, washes his hands of it.

“I suspect that Graham Platner is not the only American to have gone through a dark period,” Sanders told Axios. “What he did was he expressed his darkness on the internet. Probably not a brilliant thing to do, alright? And he said things that are stupid, things that were hurtful. He has apologized for them.”

Which led one cowardly Democrat to tell The Hill anonymously that “I do not understand how we can go from having a subset of the party that is obsessed with calling Donald Trump a Nazi to then going to vast lengths to excuse a Nazi tattoo.”

The Platner revelation came just after Democrats felt compelled to stand by Jay Jones, a candidate for Virginia attorney general – the chief law enforcement officer of the state – who fantasized about killing a political opponent and his children, and said he’d be happy to see cops killed.

Not one prominent Democrat called on Jay Jones to leave the race.

Instead, the typical response was what former Richmond Mayor Levar Stoney told National Review:

“Obviously, those text messages are indefensible, but I’ve known Jay Jones for a long period of time. He’s a friend. He made a mistake, he apologized, he’s been accountable for that.”

This Time Socialism Is Really Going To Work, Bolivia Edition Francis Menton

https://www.manhattancontrarian.com/blog/2025-10-25-socialism-is-really-going-to-work-this-time-bolivia-edition

As all good true believers know, the only reason that Socialism has thus far always failed in practice is that real Socialism has never yet been implemented.  And thus we have my home town of New York, until now the world capital of capitalism, about to put into office a self-proclaimed Socialist, or maybe Communist, to give Socialism just one more shot.

How could large numbers of seemingly intelligent people believe that this could work?  One reason is a remarkable lack of news coverage of the economic status and trajectory of the places that avowedly practice Socialism.  My mission here at Manhattan Contrarian is to fix that.

Consider Bolivia.  Have you read anything about it lately?  They had a presidential election last week, which merited some small interior articles in newspapers I read.  The articles I saw before starting to research the topic barely mentioned the current economic situation, and did not mention at all the economic trajectory since the Socialists took power back in 2006. 

In the election, which was held on October 20, the nearly 20 year Socialist government has just been voted out by a huge electoral majority.  The back story is that the effort to implement Socialism had failed disastrously, as it always does.  But just as important is the trajectory followed by the economy under Socialist rule.  Here’s the summary: first, an early period of euphoria, where Socialist prescriptions like nationalizations of large businesses (in Bolivia, particularly natural gas sector) funded extensive handouts to government supporters; then a period where the nationalized industries gradually declined until they could not support the handouts any longer; and finally the inevitable economic crisis and collapse.

Make Believe ‘Global Justice’ by Nils A. Haug

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21982/make-believe-global-justice

The events of October 7, 2023, one recalls, began on a quiet, peaceful holiday morning. Innocent Israelis near the Gaza Strip were either still asleep in their homes, had just started going about their day, or were enjoying the Supernova music festival. All at once, thousands of rockets launched from Gaza came raining down, terrorists flew in on motorized paragliders, and bulldozers crashed through the Gaza border fence, followed by pickup trucks and motorcycles pouring over the border carrying murderous hordes intent on slaughtering them. As a result, Israelis of all ages, babies included, were cut down, raped, burned alive, and beheaded – for no reason other than living in Israel.

Israel retaliated, as any normal nation would have done. Nonetheless, it was viciously blamed, starting the next day, for defending its people and homeland, and pursuing the perpetrators of atrocities.

The use of the term “global justice” for charges against Israel is therefore an artifice — a slogan designed to deceive the public into believing an invented people is a “just cause,” as the late senior Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) official, Zuheir Mohsen, admitted in 1977:

“The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. Yes, the existence of a separate Palestinian identity exists only for tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan.”

Israel’s war against terror, if one regards it as a fight between a civilization with laws vs. seventh-century terrorism with machetes, is the quintessence of a just war. Unfortunately, for its critics, it happens to be a righteous, justifiable, act of self-defense…

If Israel is committing genocide, they’re really, really bad at it. They could have had genocide on October the eighth…. It’s absurd. If they were trying to commit genocide, it would not have taken them 22 months.” — US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, CBS News, August 8, 2025.

“The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born; now is the time of monsters.” — Antonio Gramsci, Italian politician, 1924.

Many of Europe’s leaders, in pandering to terrorists for votes, can be considered complicit in the rise of Jew-hatred and are therefore culpable for the consequences – which, ironically, look as if they will be worse for their countries than for Israel, the country they have been trying to undermine.

Today they are celebrating and congratulating US President Donald J. Trump on the release by Hamas of the living Israeli hostages as part of his Gaza peace plan. Yesterday they were trying to come up with any means they could to disregard him and undermine Israel.

The Islamo-left is on the march across Britain That protest in Whitechapel exposed the suicidal idiocy of leftists who cosy up to Islamism. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/26/the-islamo-left-is-on-the-march-across-britain/

The next time someone asks what we mean when we say ‘Islamo-left’, I’m going to show them footage from yesterday’s protest in Whitechapel in East London. What a morally suicidal schlep that was. What an unholy union of witless leftists and menacing Islamists. ‘Refugees welcome here!’, cried the granola-fed grads of the limp-wristed left. ‘Allahu Akbar!’, barked the masked mob of religious hotheads. Rarely has the lethal idiocy of the left’s bed-hopping with Islamism been so starkly exposed.

This assembly of godless genderfluids and Koran-botherers was ostensibly a march against UKIP. That knackered old party had hoped to hold its own protest in Whitechapel yesterday. It was clearly a provocation: they targeted Whitechapel precisely because it has a large Muslim population. A Ukipper’s wet dream is to wang on about ‘Islamist invaders’ and the need for ‘remigration’ as Bangladeshi Brits look on with alarm. A wind-up masquerading as a march. The Metropolitan Police, fearing ‘serious disorder’, put the kibosh on it and told UKIP to do their wailing elsewhere.

So they went to Whitehall instead. Around 75 of them gathered outside the London Oratory with their flags and their hernias. And Whitechapel was left to the Islamo-left, to that seething mob of plummy radicals and gruff Islamists who love to scream blue murder about ‘Zionists’. And there you have it: in the eyes of the Met it is an offence against decency to let a handful of Ukippers traipse through Whitechapel, but it is absolutely fine to surrender those same streets to columns of black-clad fanatics raging against ‘Zionist scum’. The hypocrisy stinks to heaven.

The anti-UKIP counter-demo in Whitechapel was not an anti-racist march. We all know it. The dogs in the street know it. It was an orgy of intolerance dolled up as tolerance. It was a display of Islamist arrogance wearing the thin veil of ‘anti-racism’ to fool the overeducated idiots of the bourgeois left. Well, if they’ll believe someone with a cock can be a lesbian, they’ll believe Islamist fanatics who dream of annihilating the Jewish homeland are anti-racists.

For those of us who still have a quaint attachment to the virtues of reason and secularism, it was a sickening spectacle. Mobs of men in black masks hollered Islamist slogans in a distinctly menacing manner. They denounced ‘Zionist scum’ and darkly promised to hound them ‘off our streets’. They yelled ‘From the river to the sea’ (translation: destroy the Jewish homeland) and sang the praises of ‘our martyrs’ (translation: the Jew-killers of Hamas). And all the while, the pricks of the new left who think it’s bigotry to say ‘he’ about a fella in a dress just stood there smiling.

Anyone who says ‘They were just criticising Zionism’ is going to get slapped. Our crisis is too pressing for pussy-footing. When the devotees of a hardcore species of Islam take to the streets to fume about ‘Zionists’, we know who they mean. We know they don’t mean people like me – Gentiles who support Jewish nationhood. It’s not the likes of us they want to drive out of Britain, 1290-style. It’s them. Those Zios. The kippah people. Are we really going to do that dumb dance of saying, ‘Criticising Zionism is not the same thing as hating Jews’? Stop it. I’m tired.

Here’s my question: why is it racism for Ukippers to dream of expelling ‘Islamist invaders’ from the UK, but anti-racism for Islamists and their posh simps on the left to agitate for the expulsion of ‘Zionists’ from Britain’s streets? I agree UKIP’s chants were racist. To brand Muslims ‘Islamist invaders’ and demand their ‘remigration’ is vile bigotry. But why can’t the left say the same about the Zio-bashing that we all know is Jew-bashing? Far from calling that out, they snuggle up to it. They fancy themselves as the righteous enemies of racism when in truth they are the obsequious fluffers of Islamist bigotry.

The Left’s Never-Ending Outrage Machine From “No Kings” tantrums to ballroom hysteria, Democrats’ endless outrage shows the same pattern—Trump leads, they react, and outrage is all they have left. By Roger Kimball

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/26/the-lefts-never-ending-outrage-machine/

The Democrats appear to be a never-ending source of pitiable entertainment these days. Last week, it was the pathetic “No Kings” (what some mischievous wag called “No Brains”) rallies across the country. Those 2,700 anti-Trump therapy sessions for aging, anencephalic boomers were funded to the tune of $294 million by such public-spirited individuals and entities as Arabella Advisors, the Tides Foundation, George Soros, and Warren Buffett. Such streams of cash funneled millions through dozens of left-leaning entities, including the American Civil Liberties Union, the National LGBTQ Task Force, the Sierra Club Foundation, the Democracy Forward Foundation, and other havens for the perpetually aggrieved.

It was a noisy but preposterous temper tantrum, full of sound and fury, signifying stupidity. The union of Kumbayah gestures with rage-filled pantomimes was both inadvertently comic and repellent, the odor of rotting pseudo-idealism wafting over the proceedings everywhere.

The insurmountable problem all of those protestors faced was the incontrovertible fact that Donald Trump is not a king. He is a duly elected president who handily won both the Electoral College and the popular vote. He campaigned precisely on the issues that the unhappy pot-bangers and sign-wavers bewailed: closing the border, expelling illegal migrants, dismantling the woke DEI apparat in academia and the federal government, and resuscitating and Americanizing the U.S. economy.

If Trump were a king, why would he not simply outlaw such puerile displays of maliciousness as the “No Kings” rallies? Why wouldn’t he simply decree the government open again? No, the whole thing was ridiculous. I doubt that even the participants could have taken their make-believe protests seriously. But they probably feel they have to do something to make themselves heard these days. In the face of the perpetual-motion machine that is Donald Trump, what is an underemployed Democrat to do?

Just as nature abhors a vacuum, so the wokerati abhor an absence of outrage. It is an addiction, a sickness, a craving that cannot be denied. “Outrage or burst”: that’s their motto. So no sooner had the hangover of the “No Kings” fiasco begun to dissipate than a new draught was necessary. Trump supplied it with the news that he was going ahead with his plans to add a new ballroom—paid for with private funds—to the White House.

The Left is ‘Bleeding Kansas’ America again flirts with its own “Bleeding Kansas”—a cycle of partisan violence and defiance where lawless zealots are hailed as patriots and the rule of law bleeds away. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/27/the-left-is-bleeding-kansas/

In the late 1850s, “Bleeding Kansas” was the term used to describe the escalating cycle of violence, when surrogates for the Union and soon-to-be Confederacy fought each other over whether Kansas would be admitted as a free or slave-owning state.

As the assaults and killings increased, radicals set the agenda. The logical next step was the nightmares of Fort Sumter and Bull Run.

Those calling for restraint and peaceful resolutions were considered weak and traitorous. The thuggish and violent, instead, were praised as the true idealists and patriots, the real “base” of their respective parties.

We have witnessed a growing wave of left-wing assassins and would-be assassins in the last few years: James Hodgkinson, Luigi Mangione, James Crooks, Ryan Routh, Elias Rodriguez, and Tyler Robinson, who have targeted Republican House leaders, CEOs, Donald Trump, Jews, and Charlie Kirk. For months, leftists vandalized or torched anything to do with the Tesla brand, and with virtual impunity, they sometimes went after individual Tesla owners. Jews walked in the shadows on campuses, where mobs cheered Hamas killers.

From June through October 2020, Antifa- and BLM-led rioting led to 35 deaths, $2 billion in damage, 14,000 arrests, and 1,500 injured police. On January 6, violence left five dead, four from the protesting side. But whereas the federal government immediately and often excessively jailed both violent and peaceful 2021 protesters, almost all of the 14,000 protesters and rioters of 2020 were released by left-wing blue-city and federal prosecutors and judges.

ICE officers and facilities remain under siege in a number of major cities. In this current left-wing legitimization of violence, the Democrat Party is now embracing an eerie channeling of an earlier, pre- and post-Confederate ethos. Nonstop Democrat grandees call for their resistance to hit the street, if need be, to go lower than the “gutter,” and to “let your rage fuel you.”

The demagogic, anti-ICE bluster of Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, Oregon Governor Tina Kotek, and Portland Mayor Keith Wilson is nullificationist and state-rights supremacy to the core.

New York mayoral candidate Zoran Mamdani, in the spirit of Jefferson Davis, recently summed up the left’s resistance best, bragging that he hoped to disconnect New York local governance from federal government authority entirely—at least in the obligatory rather than beneficiary sense.

How ‘antisemitic’ activist Linda Sarsour nurtured socialist Zohran Mamdani’s NYC mayoral bid Story by Rich Calder

Antisemitic activist Linda Sarsour isn’t just playing a big role in Zohran Mamdani’s NYC’s mayoral campaign — she’s been a political mentor and close friend of the silver-spoon socialist for nearly a decade and helped guide his far-left hatred of Israel, according to a foreign intelligence report and critics.

Mamdani’s propensity for making pie-in-the-sky Marxist campaign promises date back to his high school days when he made a failed bid for student government with a “fresh juice for all” campaign.

However, it was the Hamas-supporting, Palestinian-American firebrand Sarsour who helped nuture the 34-year-old into the radical mayoral frontrunner he is today, according to a foreign intelligence service report obtained by The Post.

”Zohran Mamdani’s candidacy is linked closely within a network of Islamist figures and organizations with extremist associations,” says the document, which names notorious Brooklyn Imam Siraj Wahhaj, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing who once urged “jihad” on New York City.

“His reliance on Linda Sarsour as a mentor, and her own allegiance to . . . Wahhaj, situates Mamdani within the ideological chain of influence extending from Wahhaj’s radical teachings to the political sphere of New York City,” the document reads.

Sara Forman, executive director of the pro-Israel New York Solidarity Network, called Sarsour “one of the main antagonists for normalizing anti-Israel rhetoric in New York’s public sphere.”

“Much of what Zohran Mamdani now says about Israel and Zionists would have never been politically acceptable in New York,” said Forman.

“Linda Sarsour is an absolutist, committed to the destruction of the State of Israel with every fiber of her being,” she added. “Zohran Mamdani’s brand of socialism is intertwined with, and indistinguishable from, Linda’s and certainly a reflection of her decades of work to delegitimize Israel.”

Mamdani was “largely unknown in New York political circles” until joining the Sarsour-founded Muslim Democratic Club of New York in 2017, the report notes.

Palestinians’ ‘Technocratic Government’: The Mother of All Deceptions by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/22016/gaza-palestinians-technocratic-government

According to a report by Israel’s KAN News, Hamas has already selected half of the technocratic government’s members, including figures sympathetic to the terror group, while the Palestinian Authority, headed by Mahmoud Abbas, chose the other half. Mediators, including Egypt, presented the full list to Hamas to ensure its approval, a move that will allow the terror group to maintain influence in the Gaza Strip after the war.

The terrorists who launched the war by committing the worst crime against Jews since the Holocaust and who brought death and destruction on their own people should not be allowed to have a say in the future governance of the coastal enclave.

If Hamas is allowed to maintain a security presence in the Gaza Strip, this means that the new government and its members would be at the mercy of terrorists and militiamen who are already carrying out extrajudicial executions against their critics, political opponents and suspected “collaborators” with Israel.

US President Donald J. Trump’s plan for ending the war in the Gaza Strip states: “Hamas and other factions agreed to not have any role in the governance of Gaza, directly, indirectly, or in any form. Gaza will be governed under the temporary transitional governance of a technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee, responsible for delivering the day-to-day running of public services and municipalities for the people in Gaza.”

The factions that met in Cairo made no mention of an “international transitional body” or the proposed “Board of Peace” as outlined in Trump’s plan.

Needless to say, the Palestinian factions pointedly ignored the part of Trump’s plan that calls on the terror groups to lay down their weapons. Hamas leaders have repeatedly emphasized that their group has no intention to disarm before the establishment of an independent and sovereign state.

Fatah and Hamas, in short, do not want Trump’s “Board of Peace” or any international body to play any role in the governance of the Gaza Strip. Each of the two factions wants the Gaza Strip to be ruled by its own loyalists, masquerading as “independent” and “apolitical” figures.

What we are currently witnessing is an attempt by both Fatah and Hamas, with the help of Egypt and Qatar (Hamas’s main sponsor and funder), to circumvent the Trump plan.

Are Egypt and Qatar working to ensure Hamas’s continued rule over the Gaza Strip by allowing the terror group to choose members of a new technocratic government?