Yes, anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism Zarah Sultana is so wrong. Today’s obsessive loathing for Israel is definitely driven by bigotry. Brendan O’Neill *******

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/08/20/yes-anti-zionism-is-anti-semitism/

Is it anti-Semitic to criticise Israel? Of course not. No nation on Earth should be shielded from the brickbats or even the ridicule of the world’s citizens.

Is it anti-Semitic to rage day in, day out against Israel? To think of little else? To let this tiny state occupy your every waking thought? To call it uniquely barbarous, borderline demonic, a nation that lusts after blood like no other? To dream of its destruction? To traipse through the streets every week hollering for its obliteration? To call its citizens genocidal freaks and lunatics? To taunt them with memories of their ancestors’ extermination by branding them ‘Nazis’? To devote yourself so singularly to this one nation’s erasure that you come to define your entire political personality by that warped goal and proudly declare yourself an ‘anti-Zionist’?

Yes. Yes, that is anti-Semitic. If you maniacally obsess over the Jewish homeland, and detest Jewish nationalism more than any other nationalism, and gleefully chant for the death of the Jewish nation’s soldiers, and fantasise about the violent excision of the Jewish State ‘from the river to the sea’, then you have a problem with Jews. And more of us need to say so.

The anti-Zionism vs anti-Semitism debate is one of the most infuriating of our times. It reared its head again this week following an interview Zarah Sultana gave to the New Left Review. She’s the former Labour MP, now independent MP, who is setting up a new political party with the Magic Grandpa of Britain’s knackered left, Jeremy Corbyn. She praised Corbyn’s tenure as leader of the Labour Party from 2015 to 2020, but she made some digs, too. He too meekly ‘capitulated’ to the definition of anti-Semitism put forward by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, she said. And that was bad because the IHRA ‘equates [anti-Semitism] with anti-Zionism’.

She is presumably referring to the IHRA’s insistence that some forms of Israel-bashing cross the line from political critique into something darker and dodgier. For example, using ‘symbols and images associated with classic anti-Semitism’, such as ‘claims of Jews killing Jesus’, to ‘characterise Israel or Israelis’. That seems reasonable to me. I once saw a placard on a ‘pro-Palestine’ demo that said ‘They killed Jesus and now they’re killing Palestinians’ – anyone denying the virulent Jew hatred in such a crude cry is either a fool or a liar.

The IHRA also says it is suspect to make comparisons between ‘contemporary Israeli policy’ and the policies of the Nazis. Again, that’s reasonable. I don’t want anyone cancelled or censored for drawing pitiless and historically illiterate links between the Nazis’ industrialised burning of the Jews and Israel’s wars against the armies of anti-Semites that surround it. But it is unquestionably bigoted. The gross fashion for referring to Gaza as a new Warsaw Ghetto, or to Israel’s war on Hamas as a new holocaust, or to Benjamin Netanyahu as the new Hitler, has one aim and one aim only: to wound Jews with reminders of their people’s near destruction; to shame them by likening them to the very monsters they were once gassed by.

Ms Sultana got some flak on X. Some people even called her anti-Semitic. She fired back. Your ‘smears won’t work this time’, she said. And then, definitively: ‘Anti-Zionism is not anti-Semitism.’ She warned those accusing her of being anti-Jewish to ‘lawyer up’. I am more than happy to accept that Ms Sultana is not an anti-Semite. I hope she and her new party extend that courtesy to others and hold back from branding them ‘Islamophobes’. Otherwise, who knows, they might have to ‘lawyer up’, too. But on anti-Zionism, she is plain wrong. To some of us, it is patently clear that this strange and feverish ideology that has such a brutish grip on the minds of our young and our intellectuals is often anti-Semitism in wokeface.

Let’s leave to one side Ms Sultana and take a look at the broader Israelophobic animus that has swept the West like a fever since Hamas’s fascistic pogrom of 7 October 2023. There is nothing more disingenuous than when leftist hotheads or liberal scribes say, ‘It isn’t anti-Semitic to criticise Israel’, because we are not talking about criticism of Israel. We are talking blind hatred for Israel. Hysteria about Israel. The fantasy of Israel’s death. The wild and demented conviction that Israel is the most murderous state in existence, if not the most murderous state ever, and that it wields staggering power over the obsequious nations of the West. That’s not criticism – it’s a species of madness, built on the foul belief that the Jewish State is the most nefarious, most bloody and most sneakily powerful state on Earth.

Netanyahu: Aussie PM is ‘weak,’ has ‘abandoned’ Australian Jews By David Isaac

https://www.jns.org/netanyahu-denounces-australian-pm-after-mk-banned/

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday slammed Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese as a weak leader after Canberra canceled the visa of a Knesset member who had been planning to visit the country.

“History will remember Albanese for what he is: A weak politician who betrayed Israel and abandoned Australia’s Jews,” Netanyahu posted to X.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar also weighed in, describing the Australian government’s decision as “shameful” during an interview with The Erin Molan Show.

“Instead of battling against antisemitism in Australia, as they should, they are doing the opposite. They are fueling antisemitism by these mad decisions to ban from Australia Israeli politicians and other figures,” Sa’ar said on Tuesday.

On Monday, Australia denied entry to Israeli parliamentarian Simcha Rothman (Religious Zionism) ahead of his planned solidarity visit to the country’s Jewish community.

The move follows other visa cancellations by Australia, including that of Hillel Fuld, a pro-Israel social media personality, in June, and in November 2025 of former Israeli Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked.

In retaliation for banning Rothman, Sa’ar on Monday revoked the visas of Australian representatives to the Palestinian Authority.

In response, Australia’s Foreign Minister Penny Wong posted a statement to her ministry’s website on Tuesday:

“At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu Government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution. This is an unjustified reaction, following Australia’s decision to recognize Palestine.”

Israel’s High Court of injustice and the Red Cross Ruthie Blum

https://www.jns.org/israels-high-court-of-injustice-and-the-red-cross/

Israel’s High Court of Justice has once again revealed its misplaced priorities. And that’s putting it delicately.

In a hearing on Monday about National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s policy to bar Red Cross visits to Nukhba terrorists in Israeli prisons until the organization gains access to the hostages in Gaza, the judges made their outrage clear. But their fury was not aimed at Hamas or the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), which has utterly abandoned its humanitarian mission. Instead, it was directed at their own government and prison authorities.

The ex parte session was spurred by a petition on behalf of the terrorists. It was submitted by the usual left-wing “suspects”: the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, Physicians for Human Rights, HaMoked (the Center for the Defense of the Individual) and Gisha.

These NGOs pulled a typical fast one. They first acknowledged that “Hamas doesn’t provide information about those it holds in captivity, and refuses to allow Red Cross visits to the hostages … in Gaza [among whom] are those who were murdered in Hamas captivity.”

They then went on to get to the crux of their foul maneuver to equate victim and perpetrator, by stating that “Israel’s obligations toward those it holds do not change because of Hamas’s war crimes and crimes against humanity.”

As if Israel’s “holding” of mass murderers is comparable to Hamas’s “holding” of innocent captives.

Not surprisingly, Justice Yitzhak Amit, the self-anointed president of the Supreme Court, agrees with this twisted logic. But the reasoning that he proffered during the hearing went beyond woke politics to focus on his personal reputation and that of his hallowed perch in the international arena.   

“Right now, what’s … being publicized abroad [is] that there is starvation, that dozens of prisoners are dying, that it’s basically the Israeli Guantánamo,” he bellowed, banging on his table. “And you’re putting us, the court, at the forefront, on the front line.”

Christopher F. Rufo The New Yorker’s Racialism Problem Prestige media has turned “antiracism” into a farce. It’s time to move beyond it.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/new-yorker-doreen-st-felix-sydney-sweeney

It seems that all of the conventional opinion of America’s chattering class is condensed and printed once a week in the pages of the New Yorker. In normal times, this process yields some good writing and reporting. In certain periods, the magazine has produced some magnificent work. But we have not lived in normal times for the past decade. The conventional opinions of the chattering classes have ranged from delusional idealism to racialist fever dreams, and worse.

The most recent illustration of this trend is an essay by New Yorker staff writer Doreen St. Felix, who penned a screed about the blonde starlet Sydney Sweeney. Sweeney, St. Felix mused, represents a fantasy “Aryan princess” to some of her fans, with her much-discussed breasts placed in dark contrast with “the Black man’s hunger for ass.”

This is not the New Yorker of the past; it is something different. What is it, exactly? Beginning a decade ago, the New Yorker, like many of its peers, jumped on the “diversity and inclusion” bandwagon and declared itself an “anti-racist” institution. The magazine, owned by Condé Nast, set explicit racial quotas in hiring and pledged to “talk about racism” at every opportunity.

The magazine was capitulating to critical race ideologies. It snapped up writers, like St. Felix, who is black, to provide “representation” not only of favored demographic groups but also of a certain flavor of opinion.

After St. Felix’s Sweeney essay, a colleague sent me a link to one of her posts on X. “I hate white men,” the post read in part.

Nigerian Leftist Calls for a New Constitution for America Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm-plus/nigerian-leftist-calls-for-a-new-constitution-for-america/

A Nigerian immigrant and a German publishing company teamed up to call for the destruction of America and a new Constitution.

In the name of ‘democracy’.

Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris both ran (and lost) on ‘democracy’ and the media branded Trump’s victories as defeats for ‘democracy’. This may seem confusing for those who think democracy means ‘one man, one vote’, but for the Left, democracy means that they win, democratic power means they wield it and anything that threatens their hegemony is a ‘threat to democracy’. When they talk about saving democracy, they really mean working to eliminate it.

So in this Orwellian landscape, calls for democracy are about the scariest things around.

Moderates see election defeats as a setback while extremists see them as an opportunity to radicalize a shocked base into accepting their radical plans. Did Kamala lose in 2024? That’s because we just don’t have enough “democracy”. What does democracy look like?

Osita Nwanevu, a writer at the New Republic, a formerly liberal turned leftist magazine bought in succession by a Facebook founder and banking fortune heir, has a big idea in his book, ‘The Right of the People: Democracy and the Case for a New American Founding’, but it’s really the same old idea of smashing the existing system and replacing it with whatever will expand the power of the Left and then calling that totalitarian farce of insider ‘stakeholders’ democracy.

In Nwanevu’s native Nigeria, efforts at ‘democracy’ melted down into a civil war in which millions died. By his account, Nwanevu’s father seemingly fought on the Biafran side. Nigeria’s ‘democratic’ elections routinely begin and end with violence. And Osita Nwanevu thinks that the answer for America is for the Left to stage its own coup and construct a new Constitution.

Animal Farm Turns 80 The book that the Communists wanted to kill is more relevant than ever. by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/animal-farm-turns-80/

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”

The 80th anniversary of the publication of Animal Farm passed almost without notice on college campuses where Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto is the most assigned political work and in a culture where ‘Equity’ took the book’s sardonic corruption of equality from satire to reality.

Orwell, a fierce opponent of the Soviet Union, had his journalism relentlessly censored by British Communists and their fellow travelers, forcing him to resort to fiction, first Animal Farm and then 1984. The direct inspiration for Animal Farm had come from ‘The Adventures of the Little Pig’ a pre-war children’s book published by the ‘Left Book Club’ to indoctrinate children into anti-capitalism as the little pig grapples with various threats embodying rapacious capitalism.

The Left Book Club had been created “to provide machinery by which books of urgent political importance could be issued at a very low price” and while ‘The Adventures of the Little Pig’ was successful at the time, its political indoctrination is so mild by the standards of contemporary children’s literature, in which Antiracist Baby and the Little Engine That Could Pays a Visit to the Pride Parade are normative, that it’s borderline undetectable, and is mostly forgotten today.

But 8 years later, Orwell used a story about some pigs and other barnyard animals to distill a capsule history of the Bolshevik revolution through its various phases from the promise of liberation to the descent into an even bleaker tyranny than anything that had come before.

Despite the animal fable, Orwell found it nearly impossible to find a publisher. Unlike The Adventures of the Little Pig there was nothing childish about Animal Farm and the book was clearly not meant for children. Anyone familiar with the history of the USSR knew exactly what Orwell was on about which meant that British Communists rushed to suppress it, warning that it was a threat to national security, the war effort and would ruin relations with Moscow.

Orwell’s old enemy, the Ministry of Information, infested with Communists and leftists, did everything possible to make certain Animal Farm would never see the light of day. Orwell would make the ‘Ministry’ the focus of 1984 where it would be known as the Ministry of Truth and in the business of lies, doublespeak and industrial level societal brainwashing. Even Soviet spies took an interest in Animal Farm and worked to suppress the biting critique of the USSR.

Say, Whatever Happened To All Those Devastating Spending Cuts We Were Warned About?

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/08/20/say-whatever-happened-to-all-those-devastating-spending-cuts-we-were-warned-about/

“U.S. deficit grows to $291 billion in July despite tariff revenue surge.” – CNBC

That and other headlines greeted the release of the latest monthly Treasury Department report last week, which showed that the July deficit was $47 billion higher than the year before – even though revenues came in $8 billion higher.

Turns out that, despite all the protests, the screaming, and purple-hair-pulling and nose-ring-wiping about President Donald Trump’s “devastating cuts,” spending in July was $55.5 billion higher than it was a year ago.   

What’s more, there were jumps for outlays for agencies such as Veterans Affairs (up $3 billion year-over-year), Medicaid (up $15 billion), the EPA (up $195 million), the National Science Foundation (up $14 million) – all of which were supposedly being slashed and burned.

In fact, just five of the 15 Cabinet-level agencies spent less this July than they did last year.

As we’ve pointed out many, many times in this space, when it comes to spending cuts, both sides exaggerate what’s going on. Democrats do so because they want never-ending spending increases, and Republicans do so because they want to look like fiscal hawks.

The truth is that spending keeps growing, and growing, and growing. That is nowhere more true than when it comes to Medicaid, which as we exposed here (see “One Chart To Kill The Medicaid Lies For Good”), continues to climb at an unsustainable pace under the One Big Beautiful Bill.

But, don’t despair, because things are getting better under Trump.

Poll: Trump Approval Surges to 54 Percent After Meeting with Putin by Olivia Rondeau

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/18/poll-trump-approval-surges-to-54-after-meeting-with-putin/

President Donald Trump’s voter approval rating surged to 54 percent following his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.

An InsiderAdvantage survey conducted over the weekend found that Trump “now has an advantage among every age group other than the most senior of voters,” and improved his numbers among black (23.7) and Hispanic voters (47.2). White voters are at a near-record high approval with 64 percent.

Over half of independents (50.4) are approving of Trump, while the vast majority of Republicans (92) and 17.9 percent of Democrats said the same. 

The poll found that 44 percent of voters disapprove of Trump, giving him a net +10 percent approval rating.

The publication’s last poll conducted in July found Trump to have 50 percent approval, with 48 percent disapproving, for a net +2 percent rating.

“Only the nation’s oldest voters disapprove of his job performance, which is consistent with our prior surveys,” pollster Matt Towery said Monday. “Overall, his approval numbers are surging upwards post-summit.”

Trump said his meeting with Putin resulted in “great progress,” and the Russian leader said his war with Ukraine would have never begun if Trump was president in 2022 instead of Joe Biden. 

Olivia Rondeau is a politics reporter for Breitbart News based in Washington, DC. Find her on X/Twitter and Instagram.

Sally Rooney’s luxury loathing for Israel The ban on Palestine Action has made martyrs out of moral conformists. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/08/18/sally-rooneys-luxury-loathing-for-israel/

Reading that soppy Sally Rooney op-ed in Saturday’s Irish Times, it suddenly struck me: the UK government’s proscription of Palestine Action is one of the best things that’s happened to her. And to all the other keffiyeh-adorned poseurs in the bourgeois cult of Israelophobia. For at last, these people get to disguise their morally conformist abhorrence for the Jewish State as something radical. As something daring, sexy, possibly illegal, a thing you might even be arrested for. Courtesy of Keir Starmer’s clampdown on Palestine Action, these privileged spouters of the conventional wisdom of blind hatred for Israel have been gifted the thing they so sorely lacked – a frisson of revolutionary defiance.

Rooney’s piece has got the digital left squealing into their keffiyehs with delight. Puffing herself like some Boudicca of the anti-Israel set, she says she will continue to cheer and even fund Palestine Action. That’s the middle-class movement that loved making a spectacle of its virtuous animus for the Jewish State by carrying out infantile and sometimes dangerous stunts. It was proscribed as a ‘terrorist’ organisation in July, meaning you can get 14 years in the clink just for expressing support for it, never mind funding it with some of the royalties from your naff novels. Our hero Sally doesn’t care, though: I’ll still back them, she says, and ‘if this makes me a “supporter of terror” under UK law, so be it’.

Is anyone else dying from second-hand embarrassment? Here we have a rich novelist, the darling of the literary establishment, cosplaying as a modern-day Bernadette Devlin. It’s giving radical chic, to borrow Tom Wolfe’s phrase, where the patrician classes cosy up to ‘street politics’ in the hope that some of its hustle and glamour might rub off on their otherwise plain, bourgeois lives. My favourite bit is when Rooney says she even intends to fund Palestine Action using the ‘residual fees’ she gets from the BBC for its ‘two fine [TV] adaptations’ of her novels. Shorter version: I’m successful and moral! She thinks she’s getting one over on the BBC, blissfully unaware that it is packed with Israel-haters like her who’ll be clinking their Prosecco glasses when they hear that their favourite novelist plans to give Beeb money to Palestine ponces.

Was the FBI Behind the Oklahoma Bombing? By Janet Levy

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/was_the_fbi_behind_the_oklahoma_bombing.html

It has always been hard to believe that the truck-bombing of the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, which killed 168 people, including 19 children at a daycare center, was planned by just one or two perpetrators acting alone. However, the official story states that the mastermind was Gulf War veteran Timothy McVeigh, and that the two others sentenced with him only helped him in various ways.

Right from the start, warning signs indicated that the investigation was being misled. The FBI developed a story claiming that a group called the Patriots Movement, which included anti-government extremists and white supremacists, was responsible for the attack. However, the agency also appeared to be trying hard to hide something. Consider these facts:

Twenty-four eyewitnesses saw a man with McVeigh just before the bombing. The FBI referred to him as John Doe 2 but later dismissed the idea that such a person existed. None of the witnesses who saw John Doe 2 were called to testify.

At least eight people connected to the investigation — including a brave police officer who was a first responder — died under mysterious circumstances, five of them reportedly by suicide.

Local reporters who looked beyond the storyline mainstream newspapers presented that the FBI had received a warning call about a bomb attack.

The sheriff’s bomb squad had even been patrolling the city before the explosion. An official of the Bureau from Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said agents had been asked not to come in to work on the day of the attack.

In a new book called Blowback: The Untold Story of the FBI and the Oklahoma City Bombing, Margaret Roberts, former news director of America’s Most Wanted, presents shocking evidence suggesting that FBI agents might have been involved, acting as agent provocateurs in an operation gone wrong.