On Sunday, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon published an op-ed in The New York Times to do what he does best: Pummel Israel while protesting against those who call him to task for it.
In the piece, Ban whined that the statements he made last week — first calling on both the Jewish state and the “occupied Palestinian territories” to stop the violence, and then doubling down on his assertion that Israeli “occupation” was the real culprit behind it — were unjustly ”twisted” to imply that he was justifying terrorism.
That the U.N. chief had said it was “human nature” for downtrodden people like the Palestinians to express their frustration through violence had something to do with Israel’s adverse reaction to his words, particularly since he hasn’t said such things about al-Qaida, Islamic State, Hezbollah or Boko Haram. You know, the group that on Saturday night burned 86 Nigerian villagers alive, among them many children.
But Ban nevertheless repeated his anti-Israel accusations.
To prove that he had been unfairly misquoted not once but twice, he clarified: “The stabbings, vehicle rammings and other attacks by Palestinians targeting Israeli civilians are reprehensible. So, too, are the incitement of violence and the glorification of killers. Nothing excuses terrorism. I condemn it categorically.”
Readers did not have time to heave the slightest sigh of relief, however, since Ban proceeded from there to explain why Israel is nevertheless responsible.