Displaying posts published in

October 2025

The Crashing Failure of the Feminist Movement By Joan Swirsky

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/10/the_crashing_failure_of_the_feminist_movement.html

Going back 250 years, the enemies of America thought long and hard about how to destroy the fledgling experiment of a democratic republic that our Founding Fathers had envisioned.  It was and continues to be clear to them that America’s strength is a function of three phenomena:

A fervent belief in the God Who makes miracles happen, for just one example the crushing defeat of the thunderously powerful English Empire’s armies by blazing patriots like General George Washington and his ragtag army of American heroes.
An equally ardent belief in and passion for the concept of freedom.  Men who knew they were going to die, and their wives who believed their deaths were for the noble cause of freedom, all sacrificed to bring about our victory over the monarchy that wanted to continue to rule us.
The most passionate was the embrace, belief in, and allegiance to family — its sanctity, its strength, its ability to weather all storms and overcome all obstacles.

If they could destroy all three, our enemies reasoned, the masses they considered essentially stupid would be forced to rely exclusively on Big Government.  And so, to this day, the socialists-cum-communists among us are employing — as their predecessors did — every malevolent, criminal, and vicious tactic they can muster to actualize that goal.

Astounding progress

The America-haters among us have already

infiltrated our public schools and contaminated generations of students with anti-American propaganda, as well as explicit pornography and grooming, even in kindergarten!
lured both Christians and Jews to abandon their faiths and to worship the new God of Social Justice.
succeeded in the leftist — and, I believe, traitorous — infiltration of our military and intelligence services like the FBI and CIA…until, that is, the redemptive entrance of President Trump and his secretary of war, Pete Hegseth.
rigged the 2020 presidential election, which political activist Dinesh D’Souza also proved in his explosive film, 2000 Mules.
On and on and on.

Still, the family remains their most desired — yet maddeningly elusive — target.

Scott Jennings Obliterates CNN Panel’s Defense of Mamdani’s Terror Connection Matt Margolis

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/10/24/scott-jennings-obliterates-cnn-panels-defense-of-mamdanis-terror-connection-n4945234

CNN’s Abby Phillip thought she had Scott Jennings cornered Thursday night. Instead, Jennings calmly dismantled the left’s latest attempt to excuse the inexcusable—and in the process, exposed the utter moral rot of their politics.

The segment centered around the recent NYC mayoral debate, where former Governor Andrew Cuomo commented on socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani’s radical record and lack of experience.

Jennings made clear why those concerns are entirely justified.

“If you watch the debate last night, most of Cuomo’s best moments were about Mamdani’s experience,” he said. Jennings then laid out what Cuomo had been getting at: “One is, if you did, God forbid, have a massive emergency like that, would you really want someone in the mayor’s seat who has never had a job, never run anything, certainly never run anything at this level?”

In a perfect world, that point alone would be enough to sink most candidates. But, as Jennings went on, things got even worse for Mamdani.

“Number two,” he continued, “it is true that Mamdani was taking a picture with an unindicted co-conspirator from the World Trade Center bombing the other day and called him a pillar of the community. Cuomo didn’t make him take that picture. Mamdani took that picture and seems to be pretty proud of it. That’s a legitimate thing to debate.”

CNN’s Abby Phillip, seemingly unwilling to accept that a left-wing darling might have a terrorism problem, tried to trap Jennings in a moral gotcha question. “Is it fair to say that he would cheer on 9/11?” she pressed, referring to a comment Cuomo made during an interview on Wednesday.

Jennings didn’t flinch. “He’s taken pictures with unindicted co-conspirators from the World Trade Center bombing,” he repeated.

CNN Destroyed Karine Jean-Pierre for Lying About Biden’s Cognitive Decline Matt Margolis

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/10/24/cnn-just-destroyed-karine-jean-pierre-for-lying-about-bidens-cognitive-decline-n4945237

I have no doubt that when Karine Jean-Pierre went on CNN to talk about her new book that she expected a routine softball interview, but, in a surprising twist, anchor Brianna Keilar shredded Jean-Pierre for shamelessly lying and deflecting when confronted about the president’s cognitive state.

Keilar began by citing Original Sin by Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, which documented that “cabinet secretaries were telling them that Biden wasn’t up to the task of the proverbial 2:00 AM phone call. George Clooney said Biden didn’t even recognize him at the fundraiser that he was hosting.” She pressed Jean-Pierre: “Why, why didn’t you see…. Why didn’t you have concerns? Why didn’t you raise them?”

Jean-Pierre’s response was as evasive as it was absurd. “So, I did not have any concerns. I saw him on a daily basis, Brianna. You know that. I saw him every day. I engaged with him every day,” she claimed. She acknowledged Biden “showed age” but insisted, “This is a president that was sharp. This is a president that pushed his staff. This is a president that was on top of what the policies that he cared about that were important to the American people.” Jean-Pierre went on to highlight Biden’s foreign policy credentials, reminding Keilar that the president had “led a coalition… when it came to the war in Ukraine,” all while claiming “we had some successes, some historic successes” in his first years.

Now, obviously, she’s lying. If she saw him every day, she saw things more frequently and intimately than Biden’s cabinet did. And it’s clear that Keilar knew that so she pressed further, cutting through the talking points: “Do you think he should be president right now?”

Jean-Pierre, predictably, dodged: “No. I did not see anything that concerned me when he decided to run for president. I did not.” She repeated her daily observation mantra, insisting she saw Biden “every single day” and that he was “sharp” and “on top of the policies.” When pressed about how Original Sin detailed Biden’s cognitive struggles, Jean-Pierre admitted she hadn’t read it—and had no plans to.

Keilar confronted the absurdity head-on: “A lot of people, if the leadership of their workplace imploded… and someone wrote a book with 200 sources… they would want to read it. They’d want to reflect on that. Why not?”

Jean-Pierre’s response was a textbook deflection: “No, because… I saw it personally and I experienced it personally. On an average day-to-day. And right now… look where we are today.”

Michael Torres A Long-Overdue Shakeup in Higher Education New schools, accreditors, and tests—plus new rankings—mean much-needed competition.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/universities-admissions-exams-accreditors-college-rankings?skip=1

Admissions officers from two of the nation’s elite law schools joined the Advisory Opinions podcast in early August for a conversation about how students earn a coveted spot in their institutions. Surprisingly, both lamented the dearth of high objective standards at many of the prestigious colleges and universities from which their applicants came.

“It’s actually absurd, the level of grade inflation,” said Kristi Jobson, dean of admissions at Harvard Law School. “When you have tons of people with high LSAT scores and everyone is coming with a 3.9 and up, how do you distinguish between people in a way that feels objective?”

“At one of our top national state schools, just over a 4.0 is at the 75th percentile . . . At one of our Ivy League Institutions, a 3.95 is at the bottom half of the class,” said Miriam Ingber, associate dean of admissions and financial aid at Yale Law School. As a result, she said, “we’ve stopped looking at GPA as a number.”

While it may be depressing that top students’ academic performance has been rendered meaningless, it should not be surprising. In recent decades, these institutions’ goals have gone from the pursuit of truth and the development of liberally educated citizens to the pursuit of jobs and an orthodoxy of equity.

What’s needed is a shakeup. Thankfully, new competitors are challenging the status quo. New colleges like the University of Austin and Wyoming Catholic; new college rankings like City Journal’s; new higher-education accreditors; and new admissions exams like the Classic Learning Test all offer a breath of fresh air in a stagnant marketplace.

In 2009, President Barack Obama declared that “every American will need to get more than a high school diploma.” “College for all” became the rallying cry, reiterated from the U.S. Capitol to the elementary classroom. Access to a degree became a matter of political and economic obligation. The purpose of college was no longer to learn but to serve the time required to earn a credential.

It’s no surprise that since President Obama made that statement, the proportion of Americans who view higher education as “very important” has dropped from 75 percent to 35 percent. The proportion of students showing up to college unprepared, and leaving in federally incentivized debt, has skyrocketed.

It’s Official: The Democratic Party Is Now Straight Up Socialist

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/10/25/its-official-the-democratic-party-is-now-straight-up-socialist/

When socialist Zohran Mamdani won the New York City mayoral primary, we said that the concern expressed by some Democrats was phony, because they didn’t want to admit just how far left their party had drifted.

Now, they’ve given up that pretense entirely.

On Friday, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries endorsed socialist Mamdani, saying the 33-year-old trust fund baby “has relentlessly focused on addressing the affordability crisis and explicitly committed to being a mayor for all New Yorkers.”

He’s the most senior-ranking Democrat to do so, but he joins a list that already includes Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and New York Attorney General Letitia James

Jeffries tried to add a caveat that he and Mamdani have “areas of principled disagreement.” But he can’t have it both ways.

Jeffries, and his party, are now officially on board with Mamdani’s socialist agenda, one he hopes to impose on a city that once stood for America’s financial might but will soon become the home base for radical anti-Americanism.

Besides, as we pointed out in this space in July (see: “The Democrats’ Phony Freakout About Mamdani”), party regulators were already on board with even Mamdani’s most radical proposals.

Think about what Mamdani has proposed or supported:

A yearlong freeze on rent
A $30 minimum wage
Free bus service
City-owned grocery stores
Defunding the police
Calling Israel’s war in Gaza a genocide.

‘Mainstream Democrats’ support every one of these positions in one way or another.

But now the party has nowhere to hide. Either by silence or outright endorsements of Mamdani, Democrats have let the veil drop. The party of John F. Kennedy is now the party of Karl F. Marx.

21st Century America: Raging Against the Wrong Machine Modern rebellion has become performance art—rage without risk, protest without purpose, and revolution safely contained within the comforts of conformity. By Stephen Soukup

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/25/21st-century-america-raging-against-the-wrong-machine/

One of the most popular and unintentionally hilarious bands in rock’s post-grunge, nu-metal era (the mid-to-late 1990s) was Rage Against the Machine, a Los Angeles-based quartet that was formed in 1991 and became globally famous in 1995 and 1996. The band—fronted by lead singer Zack de la Rocha and renowned guitarist Tom Morello—was popular because it was loud, funky, and nonconformist. It was unintentionally hilarious because it was “nonconformist” in the most conformist ways possible while rebelling against a peaceful and prosperous nation, largely lacking in major conflicts.

The decade of the 1990s, you may recall, was something of a golden era in American history. After a very mild recession in 1992, the economy grew by an average of better than 4% per year over the remainder of the decade. Unemployment fell over the course of those years from 8% to 4%. The stock market boomed, and nearly half of all Americans enjoyed the benefits of that boom, with the expansion of 401(k) plans pushing market participation to record highs. Productivity accelerated rapidly as computers became ubiquitous and the internet blossomed.

Meanwhile, the entire world was at peace. The Soviet Union and its Evil Empire had fallen. The United States stood alone as the world’s hyperpower. Global conflict was so meager that the Clinton administration had to invent conflicts in which to participate, even as the president himself bemoaned the fact that history had denied him the opportunity to be a “great” leader. By the end of the decade, the combination of economic growth and cuts in defense spending enabled the federal government to balance its budget for the first time in three decades.

All seemed right with the world.

But not to Zack de la Rocha and Tom Morello. De la Rocha, the son of a celebrated artist/muralist and a PhD in anthropology, was raised in the heart of beautiful and sunny Orange County, California, at the historic height of the Golden State’s own golden era. Morello, in turn, grew up in leafy Libertyville, Illinois, the son of a schoolteacher and the (admittedly, largely absent) Kenyan ambassador to the United Nations. Morello attended and graduated from Harvard before moving to Los Angeles, where he worked, for a time, as an exotic dancer.