Displaying posts published in

September 2025

Open season against the Jews The West’s obsessional attack on Israel can only be explained by its assault on its own core values and identity Melanie Phillips

https://melaniephillips.substack.com/account

All bets are off. Clearly, there’s no limit to the world’s attempt to defame, delegitimise and destroy Israel, signalling through this incitement an implicit but unmistakable indication that it’s now open season on Jews wherever they are.

The chants of “Globalise the intifada” and the Arabic cry threatening to slaughter the Jews just as Mohammed did in Khyber in the seventh century CE no longer merely represent troubling activist behaviour on the West’s pro-Gaza demonstrations. Unbelievably, the so-called civilised world is sending out implicit signals that attacking Jews, both in Israel and in the diaspora, is morally justified.

This weekend, Britain’s Starmer government is said to be planning to recognise a state of Palestine. This is in advance of a move led by France, and also including Australia and Canada, to recognise Palestine unconditionally, scheduled to take place at a meeting next week of the UN General Assembly in New York City.

There have been signs, though, that French President Emmanuel Macron may be having second thoughts. In an audio recording obtained by i24 News, he is heard saying: “I will not recognise a Palestinian state without the release of the hostages.”

By its own lights, Palestine recognition is utterly ridiculous. A state can’t be wished into being by others who merely want it to exist. “Palestine,” moreover, has no boundaries or any coherent government.

Recognition of this fantasy state is a cynical move whose purpose is to isolate Israel in world opinion and to create a Potemkin international diplomatic structure to put Israel on a course of destruction.

The consequences of recognition by such prominent Western countries are baleful. It upends international law governing the creation of states, as well as the 1993 Oslo Accords requiring a negotiated settlement of the Israel-Arab impasse.

It also supports the Palestinian genocidal agenda twice over. It rewards Hamas and other Palestinian terrorism, which incentivises yet more Islamic rejectionism, violence and war.

Moreover, Palestinian Arabs have never hidden the fact that the purpose of such a state is to provide a launching pad for the extermination of Israel and the murder of Jews. It would put the whole of central Israel within easy range of missiles fired from Ramallah.

Last week, the United Nations adopted a declaration of recognition supported by the United Kingdom, the European Union, Spain and other countries. This called not just for a boycott of Israel and an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, which would leave Hamas in power to repeat October 7-style massacres again and again, but also the resettlement of generations of Palestinian refugees within Israel itself.

ZOHRAN’S MORONS THE KATHY HOCHUL STORY Eric Levine

https://ericlevine3.substack.com/p/zohrans-morons

Lenin referred to them as “useful idiots” – the Western Europeans and Americans who supported Communism and the Soviets without fully understanding the consequences of their actions.

We are witnessing a similar phenomenon today in New York City. New Yorkers, including elected officials, Jews, members of the LGBTQ+ community, parents of school age children, crime victims, small business owners, and landlords who support Zohran Mamdani for Mayor, are all basking in the glow of their self-proclaimed enlightenment, self-importance, and virtue.

They should be dubbed Zohran’s Morons (ZMs).

Perhaps the most famous of ZMs is New York Governor Kathy Hochul. By issuing her recent full-throated endorsement of Mamdani, she has not only proven that she is intellectually limited, incompetent, and weak-willed, but she has also demonstrated that she is morally bankrupt.

She truly is America’s worst governor.

Her endorsement is vapid, incoherent, drivel. To explain why she is endorsing him she states:

“In the past few months, I’ve had frank conversations with him. We’ve had our disagreements. But in our conversations, I heard a leader who shares my commitment to a New York where children can grow up safe in their neighborhoods and where opportunity is within reach for every family. I heard a leader who is focused on making New York City affordable — a goal I enthusiastically support.”

Apparently, what they discussed remains a secret. We still do not know on what issues they disagree.

She mentions safe neighborhoods. Mamdani has made clear that he believes the NYPD is “wicked” and “evil” and that it must be defunded. Exactly how Mamdani will make New York’s neighborhoods safe remains a mystery. Of course, less affluent minority communities of color will be the most adversely impacted by the spike in crime that Mamdani’s war on cops will cause.

Hochul’s rejoinder to that is:

“I urged him to ensure that there is strong leadership at the helm of the N.Y.P.D. — and he agreed.”

I have no doubt he will appoint a strong police commissioner for the NYPD. But where will that strong commissioner lead New York’s Finest other than to early retirement? The commissioner will undoubtedly share Mamdani’s view that the NYPD is wicked and evil and needs to be restrained and defunded. Mamdani’s commissioner will undoubtedly share his pro-criminal agenda. With Mayor Mamdani, the best New York can hope for is weak incompetent leadership at the NYPD.

Obama Built the Censorship Machine — and Now It’s Backfiring Maureen Steele

https://pjmedia.com/maureen-steele/2025/09/19/obama-built-the-censorship-machine-and-now-its-backfiring-n4943910

It would almost be funny if it weren’t so destructive. Barack Obama — even now, after what many believe was his continued influence in the former Biden White House — has decided to posture himself as a defender of free speech. He recently warned that “the current administration has taken cancel culture to a new and dangerous level by routinely threatening regulatory action against media companies unless they muzzle or fire reporters and commentators it doesn’t like.” Spare us the lecture.

We’ve seen the emails from Hillary Clinton’s office where editors were told to toe the line. We’ve watched Mark Zuckerberg testify in Senate hearings, admitting that government officials “told him” what he could and couldn’t allow on Facebook. We’ve lived through the banning, the suspensions, the “fact-check” censorship of anyone daring to challenge the regime’s version of the truth. And every time, we were told it was for our safety — because “misinformation kills.” Funny thing: those so-called conspiracy theories have turned out true again and again, while the establishment’s “facts” collapse under the weight of evidence.

Obama and his surrogates have no moral authority here. They censored to tilt elections, silenced political opponents, and strangled debate. They built an entire censorship-industrial complex that they’re now desperate to deny exists. Section 230 wasn’t meant to create government-run truth ministries, but that’s what the left turned it into. They can’t unring that bell.

And then there’s Jimmy Kimmel, the court jester of the liberal elite, who just discovered what happens when the corporate mob turns on its own. Kimmel’s comments were nasty, cruel, and not remotely funny — but he had a right to say them. 

The point isn’t whether we agree with him, or whether his brand of snide “comedy” is stale. The point is that ABC didn’t fire Kimmel because of principle. It fired him because of money. The lawsuits are stacking up, the backlash is real, and “go woke, go broke” has gone from warning to reality. Corporations don’t care about free speech or decency — they care about liability and the bottom line.

The ghoulish dishonesty of Jimmy Kimmel Liberal America is finally waking up to the cruelty of cancel culture. Jenny Holland

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/20/the-ghoulish-dishonesty-of-jimmy-kimmel/

If you hear a strange, high-pitched screeching sound blowing in from the west on the salty Atlantic winds, it’s probably the keening of Blue America. Spare a thought for these souls – they are collectively finding out what it feels like to be on the receiving end of cancel culture. Turns out, it doesn’t feel great.

The most significant example of this new front in the culture war has been ABC’s decision on Wednesday to suspend late-night talkshow Jimmy Kimmel Live! ‘indefinitely’. On Monday night’s show, Kimmel had made false comments about the supposed Republican leanings of Tyler Robinson, the man alleged to have killed Charlie Kirk. Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which licenses TV stations, said Kimmel had ‘directly misled the American public’. He also suggested that unless ABC ‘can find ways to change conduct to take action, frankly, on Kimmel… there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead’. This barely concealed threat seems to have prompted ABC’s decision to take Kimmel off air.

There were also market factors at play. According to the Wall Street Journal, the move came after executives at Sinclair and Nexstar, owners of more than 60 local ABC stations, told ABC management that they did not want to carry the show after Carr’s comments. This will have caused a major headache for ABC and its parent company, Disney.

The Kimmel cancellation perfectly captures how deeply divided America has become. Sinclair and Nexstar, corporations that own the local channels in flyover states, effectively broadcast to folks in America’s blue-collar heartlands. Their Kimmel decision shows that people in those states are done with being slandered and attacked by ultra-wealthy, talentless clowns who have long since stopped entertaining.

Jimmy Kimmel as Tom Paine? Absolutely! Raskin’s comparison of Jimmy Kimmel to Thomas Paine shows just how little today’s leaders understand about America’s founding—and how dangerously they govern because of it. By Stephen Soukup

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/20/jimmy-kimmel-as-tom-paine-absolutely/

he other day, after Disney/ABC decided to suspend late-night talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, rather than allow him to do his show and further attack President Trump and his supporters, Maryland Congressman Jamie Raskin appeared on MSNBC and compared Kimmel and other talk show hosts to one of this nation’s best-known revolutionary figures. “They’re like modern Tom Paines,” the congressman intoned.

While some on the Right were upset by the comment, believing that Raskin had plied Kimmel and his ilk with undue praise, the comparison is, in many ways, quite apt. While it is true that none of the late-night hosts is smart enough or brave enough to inspire a nation to war with his writing—as Paine is said to have done with “Common Sense”—they are very much like him in other ways. You see, in addition to being an inspiring pamphlet writer, Thomas Paine was…how do I put this in a family-friendly publication? …an enormous jackass.

It’s important to note that Paine emigrated to the British American colonies in 1774, which is to say after the Boston Tea Party and after the proverbial die had already been cast and a conflict of some sort seemed inevitable. In other words, unlike most of the Founders, Paine came to America to be a part of the revolution. He didn’t live here and experience colonial rule, eventually concluding that his rights as an Englishman were being violated. He came specifically to agitate, to be revolutionary. His fundamental loyalty was not to the new American polity but to himself and his belief in the need to sweep away the old and start the world anew.

After the American Revolution, Paine eschewed the duties of a statesman to build the new nation and craft its new government, instead moving on, almost immediately, to his next adventure. In the subsequent years, Paine became an ardent supporter of the French Revolution, managed to win election as a representative to the French Revolutionary National Convention, was imprisoned for two years by Maximillien Robespierre, refused to learn that ironic lesson, plotted with Napoleon to invade Britain, returned to the United States only to be denied citizenship and the franchise by Gouverneur Morris (who actually wrote the Preamble to the Constitution), was refused burial by the local Quaker cemetery, and had his bones dug up by a fan who died with them in his house, from whence they were lost to posterity. Paine lived ignominiously and deservedly died ignominiously. Of all the American revolutionaries, he is the least deserving of the title “Founding Father” and the most deserving of being compared to a hack like Jimmy Kimmel.

Unfortunately, this is not what Congressman Raskin meant to do when he made the comparison. He meant to lionize Kimmel and convince people that the former host of “The Man Show” is a noble creature and a venerable patriot. In so doing, Raskin inadvertently revealed something annoying and potentially troubling about himself and those in his social circle (including his wife, Sarah Bloom Raskin, a highly respected law professor at Duke University and a former member of the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors): they don’t know a damn thing about this nation, its founding, or the purpose of the government its Founders established. If your go-to compliment for someone you respect and admire is to compare them to Thomas Paine, then that’s only because you don’t know anything about Thomas Paine. And that, in turn, suggests that you don’t know much at all about the founding of this great nation.

Dying to Get Out of Canada Canada’s euthanasia surge reveals the postmodern death cult’s grip—eroding truth, coercing the vulnerable, and exporting its lethal creed beyond its borders. By Thaddeus G. McCotter

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/20/dying-to-get-out-of-canada/

Postmodernism is a death cult—one to be defended against at every cancerous step this doctrine of disorder and destruction takes in its attempt to eradicate truth and tradition. What prompts this latest warning to be vigilant and proactive in thwarting the postmodern death cult? It is coming for the most vulnerable among us.

As I warned back in 2023 about Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD):

“Why should you care about Canada and assisted suicide? Well, in the first place, the American Left is constantly importing other nations’ insane and injurious policies…

“Best to keep an eye on Canada’s MAiD policies. The American Left does, and they like what they see. It’s why they want to ensure Canada’s assisted-suicide laws roll downhill to America. Sure, all life’s paths lead but to the grave. But we shouldn’t hurry to get there.”

Leftist Canadians disagree. And, since they run the country, that is bad news not only for the rest of Canada but also for the world, for the postmodern death cult is transnational.

In the years since 2023, euthanasia-mania has swept the sterile white hallways of Canadian government-run healthcare. Per a recent article by Breitbart’s John Hayward:

“Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD), Canada’s preferred euphemism for euthanasia, has become so popular that practitioners struggle to meet demand.

“According to government figures for 2023, the last full year of statistics available, MAiD accounted for 4.7 percent of deaths nationwide, making Canada second only to the Netherlands. In Quebec, the figure is over seven percent, giving it the highest euthanasia rate in the world.”

The disciples of the postmodern death cult will argue, “So, what is wrong with personal autonomy?”

Firstly, there is increasing evidence that the patient’s personal autonomy no longer has primacy in the decision to end their life. As Hayward notes, “The Canadian public still seems to support MAiD, but with growing unease that lofty talk of ‘patient autonomy’ is a smokescreen for people being pushed into euthanasia as a cost-effective alternative to prolonged medical treatment.” This is especially disconcerting, as the government-run healthcare system is severely strained financially. In Canada, Grandma being pushed into taking, as Dr. Obama suggested, the blue pill is a distinct prospect—and a not-too-distant one for Americans?

Iran Regime’s Long Game: Today Diplomacy, Tomorrow Retaliation by Majid Rafizadeh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21915/iran-regime-long-game-retaliation

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council has made it clear that if biting UN sanctions are reinstated by the West, there will be no nuclear inspections.

Whenever the Iranian regime begins to speak the language of cooperation and compromise, it is not because its leaders have chosen moderation out of principle or newfound goodwill.

Iran’s leadership is using the threat of non-cooperation as leverage: it is signaling that nuclear inspections will be blocked and compliance will be withheld unless the West grants concessions or delays reinstating sanctions. The leadership in Tehran understands that failure to prevent this could most likely spell the beginning of the end for its rule. That is why it has chosen to play the card of conditional diplomacy and intimidation.

What Tehran seeks now is exactly what it received a decade ago during the Obama years: time and relief. The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action “nuclear deal” was portrayed by the West as a breakthrough for peace and nonproliferation. In reality, it offered the Islamic Republic a lifeline. Billions of dollars were unlocked through sanctions relief, oil revenues surged, and access to the global financial system was restored.

Rather than moderating, Iran used those resources to arm Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and other proxies.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has never responded to anything but credible force. The destruction of its nuclear facilities this summer proved this, and the knowledge that further strikes could follow is one of the few things restraining the regime’s ambitions. Verification, not promises, must be the standard. Inspections should be immediate, intrusive and unconditional. Any attempt by Tehran to delay, restrict or politicize access must be met with swift consequences.

Its threats regarding nuclear inspections make it clear that Tehran is trying to force the West into concessions while maintaining the ability to obstruct verification. This is the old game it has played time and again. The West cannot afford to be deceived once more. The victims of 1983, 1994, 2001 and October 7, 2023 stand as a reminder of what happens when Iran is given space to recover.

The snapback sanctions must proceed, military pressure must remain, and the West must deny the regime the “oxygen” it seeks.

Iran’s threats demonstrate that its “cooperation” comes with strings attached, designed to intimidate and extract concessions. Do not fall again for its trap. Do not let the devil get up.

The Iranian regime has suddenly shifted its tone in recent weeks. It is now — sort of — presenting itself as willing to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Headlines have been dominated by announcements that Tehran is – maybe — prepared to allow inspectors back into its nuclear facilities, to resume talks with Western powers, and to abide by stricter oversight of its atomic activities.

At first glance, these gestures may seem like a breakthrough. Unfortunately, history demands a more skeptical reading. This is not a sign of fundamental change within the regime. Iran’s Supreme National Security Council has made it clear that if biting UN sanctions are reinstated by the West, there will be no nuclear inspections. Iran’s willingness to “cooperate” is conditional and coercive. The regime is threatening to withhold compliance to pressure the international community into softening sanctions and granting concessions, all while seeking a carefully staged maneuver designed to buy time, regain breathing space, and prepare for a stronger counterpunch down the line.