Displaying posts published in

August 2025

Poll: Trump Approval Surges to 54 Percent After Meeting with Putin by Olivia Rondeau

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/08/18/poll-trump-approval-surges-to-54-after-meeting-with-putin/

President Donald Trump’s voter approval rating surged to 54 percent following his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday.

An InsiderAdvantage survey conducted over the weekend found that Trump “now has an advantage among every age group other than the most senior of voters,” and improved his numbers among black (23.7) and Hispanic voters (47.2). White voters are at a near-record high approval with 64 percent.

Over half of independents (50.4) are approving of Trump, while the vast majority of Republicans (92) and 17.9 percent of Democrats said the same. 

The poll found that 44 percent of voters disapprove of Trump, giving him a net +10 percent approval rating.

The publication’s last poll conducted in July found Trump to have 50 percent approval, with 48 percent disapproving, for a net +2 percent rating.

“Only the nation’s oldest voters disapprove of his job performance, which is consistent with our prior surveys,” pollster Matt Towery said Monday. “Overall, his approval numbers are surging upwards post-summit.”

Trump said his meeting with Putin resulted in “great progress,” and the Russian leader said his war with Ukraine would have never begun if Trump was president in 2022 instead of Joe Biden. 

Olivia Rondeau is a politics reporter for Breitbart News based in Washington, DC. Find her on X/Twitter and Instagram.

Sally Rooney’s luxury loathing for Israel The ban on Palestine Action has made martyrs out of moral conformists. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/08/18/sally-rooneys-luxury-loathing-for-israel/

Reading that soppy Sally Rooney op-ed in Saturday’s Irish Times, it suddenly struck me: the UK government’s proscription of Palestine Action is one of the best things that’s happened to her. And to all the other keffiyeh-adorned poseurs in the bourgeois cult of Israelophobia. For at last, these people get to disguise their morally conformist abhorrence for the Jewish State as something radical. As something daring, sexy, possibly illegal, a thing you might even be arrested for. Courtesy of Keir Starmer’s clampdown on Palestine Action, these privileged spouters of the conventional wisdom of blind hatred for Israel have been gifted the thing they so sorely lacked – a frisson of revolutionary defiance.

Rooney’s piece has got the digital left squealing into their keffiyehs with delight. Puffing herself like some Boudicca of the anti-Israel set, she says she will continue to cheer and even fund Palestine Action. That’s the middle-class movement that loved making a spectacle of its virtuous animus for the Jewish State by carrying out infantile and sometimes dangerous stunts. It was proscribed as a ‘terrorist’ organisation in July, meaning you can get 14 years in the clink just for expressing support for it, never mind funding it with some of the royalties from your naff novels. Our hero Sally doesn’t care, though: I’ll still back them, she says, and ‘if this makes me a “supporter of terror” under UK law, so be it’.

Is anyone else dying from second-hand embarrassment? Here we have a rich novelist, the darling of the literary establishment, cosplaying as a modern-day Bernadette Devlin. It’s giving radical chic, to borrow Tom Wolfe’s phrase, where the patrician classes cosy up to ‘street politics’ in the hope that some of its hustle and glamour might rub off on their otherwise plain, bourgeois lives. My favourite bit is when Rooney says she even intends to fund Palestine Action using the ‘residual fees’ she gets from the BBC for its ‘two fine [TV] adaptations’ of her novels. Shorter version: I’m successful and moral! She thinks she’s getting one over on the BBC, blissfully unaware that it is packed with Israel-haters like her who’ll be clinking their Prosecco glasses when they hear that their favourite novelist plans to give Beeb money to Palestine ponces.

Was the FBI Behind the Oklahoma Bombing? By Janet Levy

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/08/was_the_fbi_behind_the_oklahoma_bombing.html

It has always been hard to believe that the truck-bombing of the A.P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995, which killed 168 people, including 19 children at a daycare center, was planned by just one or two perpetrators acting alone. However, the official story states that the mastermind was Gulf War veteran Timothy McVeigh, and that the two others sentenced with him only helped him in various ways.

Right from the start, warning signs indicated that the investigation was being misled. The FBI developed a story claiming that a group called the Patriots Movement, which included anti-government extremists and white supremacists, was responsible for the attack. However, the agency also appeared to be trying hard to hide something. Consider these facts:

Twenty-four eyewitnesses saw a man with McVeigh just before the bombing. The FBI referred to him as John Doe 2 but later dismissed the idea that such a person existed. None of the witnesses who saw John Doe 2 were called to testify.

At least eight people connected to the investigation — including a brave police officer who was a first responder — died under mysterious circumstances, five of them reportedly by suicide.

Local reporters who looked beyond the storyline mainstream newspapers presented that the FBI had received a warning call about a bomb attack.

The sheriff’s bomb squad had even been patrolling the city before the explosion. An official of the Bureau from Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) said agents had been asked not to come in to work on the day of the attack.

In a new book called Blowback: The Untold Story of the FBI and the Oklahoma City Bombing, Margaret Roberts, former news director of America’s Most Wanted, presents shocking evidence suggesting that FBI agents might have been involved, acting as agent provocateurs in an operation gone wrong.

Who Is Responsible for the Worsening of America’s Racial Divisions? Three words: Barack Hussein Obama. by Robert Spencer

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm-plus/who-is-responsible-for-the-worsening-of-americas-racial-divisions/

By the early years of the twenty-first century, it looked as if America’s traumatic racial divisions really were receding into the past. It seemed as if genuine equality of opportunity had finally been achieved, and that Americans of whatever background had a level playing field upon which they could make as much of their talents as they wished, depending on how hard they were willing to work.

But then came the presidency of Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama, who is, of course, the child of a black father and a white mother, seemed to herald the dawning of the new post-racial America. He couldn’t have been elected, of course, without the votes of millions of white Americans, and his victory in itself showed that the nation was not racist. Many white Americans voted for him in order to show that they were not racist, but others voted for him because they were not racist and simply favored his policies. Still others voted for him because they were thrilled at the prospect of showing the world that the United States really was the land of opportunity, in which a member of a once-despised and discriminated against racial minority could become president. And so when he became president, Obama embodied the hopes of many Americans — and promptly dashed them.

Throughout his disastrous eight years as president, Obama did not work to heal what remained of American’s racial divisions. Instead, he stoked racial tensions repeatedly. When he took office, the Justice Department was pursuing a case against the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation in Philadelphia. Obama’s attorney general, Eric Holder, abruptly dropped the case in May 2009 and refused to cooperate with further investigations, giving the impression that the Black Panthers were getting away with voter intimidation because of their race.

Obama’s response to several widely publicized incidents exacerbated racial tensions even more. On July 16, 2009, black intellectual Henry Louis Gates found himself locked out of his Massachusetts home and began trying to force his way in. An officer, who was white, arrived to investigate a possible break-in; Gates began berating him and was arrested for disorderly conduct. Obama claimed that the police “acted stupidly” and noted the “long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by police disproportionately,” although there was no indication of racial bias in this case.

How Did Child-Rearing Get So “Gentle”? Creating flawed characters, dangerous ideologies, and bad habits among our young. by Bruce Thornton

https://www.frontpagemag.com/how-did-child-rearing-get-so-gentle/

Complaining about the younger generations has been a common habit for many millennia. The Greek poet Hesiod in the 8th Century B.C. groused about the young, “I see no hope for the future of our people if they are dependent on the frivolous youth of today, for certainly all youth are reckless beyond words. When I was a boy, we were taught to be discrete and respectful of elders, but the present youth are exceedingly wise [disrespectful] and impatient of restraint.”

But the antiquity of such clichés doesn’t mean that in our time there hasn’t been a decline in child-rearing and education that has created flawed characters, dangerous ideologies, and bad habits among our young. For many traditional moms and dads, “gentle” parenting coddles and spoils children not just at home, but in grade schools, universities, and jobs, and accounts for many of the problems and dysfunctions of our young people.

Hence the trend of FAFO––the “f–ck around and find out” method of child-rearing. The New York Post reports one pioneer mother, Janelle who explains this novel child-rearing in her video.  “I practice authoritative parenting but within what I would consider a subgenre that I would call ‘f*ck around and find out’ parenting… [kids] get their natural consequences and get to figure out the way through them.”

Just saying “authoritarian” will shock and anger school teachers and “gentle childrearing parents.” But for multiple decades, American primary schools and parents alike have failed dismally at educating and rearing many of our children––a national disgrace for the freest, richest country in the world. Part of the problem is the idea that learning should be “fun” and “affirming” students’ self-esteem, rather than requiring a work ethic to achieve proficiency and knowledge by meeting the challenges of rigorous standards.

The Backlash Presidency

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/08/19/the-backlash-presidency/

For those who can’t understand why Donald Trump was twice elected president, including the Republicans and conservatives who continue to impugn him, we have the answer: Trump is the response to three (yes, three) terms of Barack Obama.

This country has never had a president like Trump. He doesn’t hold back, he can sometimes be crude, he sees no benefit in playing nice with people who want to destroy him (who also happen to overlap with Americans who want to take down their own country a notch or two because, in their perverted thinking, America was never great to begin with).

Love him, like him or hate him, Trump is a transformative president – he was called on to halt the road the Obama-fueled ruling class was taking the country down, to break the walls its members had built to insulate themselves from the consequences of their actions, to prosper financially at others’ expense.

Here is his record so far:

The open border. Joe Biden invited millions of unvetted migrants into this country to swing the electorate to the Democrats, establish a permanent majority, satisfy some perverted obsession with multiculturalism, and antagonize native-born Americans and new citizens who migrated the proper way. A majority of Americans had had enough and turned over border security to Trump.

The administrative state. More than half of Americans had become tired of their votes not counting. The real power and authority in Washington were the unelected bureaucrats who were carrying out the Democratic Party’s agenda. Trump has shown not just a willingness but an appetite for reining in this unaccountable, inflexible force that Democratic administrations built.

DEI. The diversity, equity, and inclusion nags are nothing more than quota peddlers. Americans who have been punished by DEI tenets and offended by its divisiveness elected a man who has made it a point to eliminate this blight on our society that has been nurtured by the left.

The EU ‘Elites’, Part II Technocrats Against Democracy by Robert Williams

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21825/eu-technocrats-against-democracy

This is technospeak for censorship, but you already knew that because this is what the “fact-checkers” at Facebook and Twitter did on behalf of the Biden administration and the FBI until Elon Musk bought Twitter and President Donald Trump was re-elected.

Of the EU institutions, the unelected European Commission wields the most power over the EU’s 400 million citizens, with its exclusive right to propose laws (the elected MEPs, bizarrely, have no such right), implement policies… The European Commission employs no fewer than 32,000 bureaucrats to help it do all that.

This is a closed-door technocratic and elitist coterie — the rule of the unelected few over almost an entire continent of 400 million people — meaning that EU initiatives with huge implications for Europeans get decided without a single ordinary European having a say in the matter.

Arguably one of the most damaging of the European Commission’s initiatives that no European citizen has asked for is the European Green Deal, which is leading EU citizens to financial ruin, and transforming the EU into an economic backwater, in the quest to transform the EU into a “net-zero” region by 2050.

Trillions of EU taxpayer euros are compelled to finance this self-destructive climate madness while Europeans continue to deal with skyrocketing energy prices — themselves the result of the climate madness — a housing crisis, sky-high prices on consumer goods and unvetted mass migration from third-world countries.

Another catastrophic EU initiative about which no European citizen was consulted, is the EU’s new Migration Pact, which will see the further deterioration of national sovereignty and the continued influx of migrants into the European Union. The pact, instead of simply closing the EU’s external open borders, requires EU member states to distribute migrants between themselves under penalty of financial sanctions. There has been no public discussion about this.

A third EU regulation with disastrous impacts on EU citizens is the Digital Security Act (DSA), which under the pretext of creating a “safer and more accountable digital space” strangles the pitiful remains of European free speech even further.

The DSA, now the law of the land throughout the member states of the EU, is being weaponized against Elon Musk — whom European elites despise — and his X platform. The European Commission is reportedly preparing to impose huge fines on Musk for breaching the DSA by, among other things, refusing to allow external “fact-checkers” on his platform to flag “disinformation”. Who, of course, would be checking the EU’s “fact-checkers”?

The European Union member states have finally arrived – while never asking the Europeans involved – at their own dystopian future.

The European Commission’s unelected president, Ursula von der Leyen, has come up with a nifty new idea in the European Union’s quest to snuff out democracy on the continent: The “European Democracy Shield.”