THE PERILS OF SELECTIVE FREE SPEECH: MARILYN PENN

June 7, 201
The Perils of Selective Free Speech
Marilyn Penn
The  instantaneous worldwide condemnation of Israel by such stalwart defenders of humanitarian rights as  Russia, Syria, Turkey and the UN itself, illustrates that hate speech against  Israel and Jews has become pro forma and acceptable without question. There was  a brief respite from knee jerk anti-semitism after the Second World War exposed  its horrifying consequences but following the declaration of Israel’s statehood,  the mantle of Jew-hatred was assumed by the Muslim world and eventually by the  radical left internationally. Now, in the 21rst century, after all the wars  initiated against Israel by Arab forces, after all the world-wide massacres  wrought by radical Islam, we still face the curious phenomenon of Israel being  singled out as the world’s leading obstacle to peace in our time.
In the west,  one of the formative reasons for the demonization of Israel in polite discourse  is the leeway afforded to its enemies to express the most outrageous claims in  our universities. We have raised a generation of students who have been  manipulated by anti-Israel faculties, by craven attempts to boycott Israel  economically and intellectually and by such phenomena as Israel Apartheid Week  whose very title is not only a patent lie but an insidious attempt to  delegitimize a democratic state. Ironically, Israel has successfully integrated  people from all over the globe and has afforded more rights to Palestinians than  all of their Arab pseudo-supporters combined. Israel has continued to extend  humanitarian aid to its self-avowed enemies who deny its right to exist and  refuse to meet with its leaders face to face. The non–Muslim students who  support Israel Apartheid Week would never participate in a week-long hate fest  dedicated to the condemnation of radical jihadi violence against Hindus, African  animists, Christians, Jews, gays and women, yet they feel sanctimoniously  comfortable scapegoating the only democracy in the middle east and the only bona  fide ally of the United States in that region.
Universities  which have severely limiting speech codes that protect against offending the  sensitivities of numerous sacred cows have no problem allowing the often  violence-inducing rallies and speeches that constitute Israel Apartheid Week at  the most prestigious campuses in America. When it comes to Israel-bashing, the  issue of academic free speech trumps concerns of campus safety for American  Jewish students. Conversely, the pro-Israel speakers are often cancelled because  of supposed concern for their safety – just think of where civil rights would be  today if our government had not been willing  to call in the National Guard when it was necessary. Instead of silencing the  fomenters of violence, universities often silence its targeted victims. Muslims  are allowed safe harbor to whip a crowd into a frenzied mob but there are speech  codes to prevent any damage to the  sensibilities of religious minorities, excluding Jews.
Imagine a game  called “Lynch a Nigger†and before expressing outrage at such a suggestion, note  that “Beat the Jewâ€, a game in which the losers are incinerated or enslaved  attracted 40 participants online in California. Seven high school seniors will be disciplined for playing but the more  telling point is that students felt no qualms about creating or advertising this horrific “game.â€Â The same young  people who have been raised with politically correct sentiments regarding blacks  and now Muslims, felt free to organize a game spoofing the holocaust while  persecuting Jews. This is a perfect example of the trickle down effects of  Israel Apartheid Week or any of the other scurrilous attacks on campus  conflating Zionism and Jews with racism, Nazism or apartheid.
Like useful  idiots, college administrators have fallen  into the traps of groups ultimately intent on destroying our freedom of speech  while utilizing it to further their own goals. There is always a fine line in  democracy between the expression of hateful thoughts and the incitement to what  we now define as hate crime. Our p.c. society has deemed those more odious than  the same crimes committed for the more traditional motives of greed, jealousy,  rage, substance induced mindset, or any other frivolous emotion that unleashes  murderous impulses. If you attacked or killed a Jewish student during Israel  Apartheid Week, it would undoubtedly be considered a hate crime. Yet throughout  the western world, including all major American cities, you can see kaffiyeh’ed  rabble rousers holding signs urging exactly that directive. Their demeanor is  frightening and intimidating and knowing what we do of the homicidal domestic  incidences of radical jihad, the question is why we tolerate it.
Several  Canadian politicians have taken the lead in condemning Israel Apartheid Week in  that democratic country; it is time for American  universities to remember the incendiary effects of Nazi propaganda and to  recoil from its contemporary incarnation in the Islamic demonization of Zionism  and Jews.
FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor  Marilyn Penn is a writer in New York who can also be read regularly at Politicalmavens.com.
					
	
		
					
			
				Comments are closed.
