Displaying posts published in

September 2012

VALERIE JARRETT IS OBAMA’S CLOSEST ADVISER…..READ THIS ABOUT HER FATHER IN LAW

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2012/09/bombshell-obama-vetting-1979-newspaper-article-by-valerie-jarrett-father-in-law-reveals-start-of-arab-purchase-of-u-s-presidency-2491770.html

Bombshell Obama Vetting: 1979 Newspaper Article By Valerie Jarrett Father-In-Law Reveals Start Of Arab Purchase Of U.S. Presidency

Why would Muslim oil billionaires finance and develop controlling relationships with black college students? Well, like anyone else, they would do it for self-interest. And what would their self-interest be? We all know the top two answers to that question: 1. a Palestinian state and 2. the advancement of Islam in America. The idea then was to advance blacks who would facilitate these two goals to positions of power in the Federal government, preferably, of course, the Presidency. And why would the Arabs target blacks in particular for this job? Well, for the same reason the early communists chose them as their vanguard for revolution (which literally means “change”) in America. Allow me to quote Trotsky, in 1939: “The American Negroes, for centuries the most oppressed section of American society and the most discriminated against, are potentially the most revolutionary element of the population. They are designated by their historical past to be, under adequate leadership, the very vanguard of the proletarian revolution.” Substitute the word “Islam” for the words “the proletarian revolution,” and you most clearly get the picture, as Islam is a revolutionary movement just like communism is. (Trivia: it is from this very quote that Van Jones takes his name. Van is short for vanguard. He was born “Anthony”). In addition, long before 1979, blacks had become the vanguard of the spread of Islam in America, especially in prisons.

Interestingly, in context with the fact that this article was written by her father-in-law, Valerie Jarrett has an unusual amount of influence over Obama (along with personal security that may be even better than his, another unusual and intriguing bit of business here). And equally interesting is that Obama, who may have been a beneficiary of this Muslim money, and may now be in this Muslim debt, has aggressively pursued both of the Muslim agendas I cited above. And, also equally interesting, is that Obama has paid a king’s ransom for court ordered seals of any such records of this potential financing of his college education, and perhaps, of other of his expenses.

A LIBERAL COLUMNIST KIRSTEN POWERS: MAINSTREAM MEDIA IGNORES OBAMA’S SHIFTING STORY ON LIBYA ATTACK TO BASH MITT ROMNEY INSTEAD

http://www.thedailybeast.com/ Write About Terrorism? Nah, Let’s All Bash Mitt Romney Instead! The mainstream media is ignoring the Obama administration’s shifting explanations for the U.S. consulate attack in Libya—and the very real terror threat it implies—in favor of piling on Romney. Kristen Powers on why we should all be worried. Kirsten Powers is a columnist for […]

24/7 NEWS AND BUZZ

http://times247.com/
Sketchy consulate story
White House credibility on Libya disintegrating Read more
AP
Top Stories
Dems join GOP in questioning Libya explanation
Senate Democrats joined Republicans …
Read more…
Panetta on Libya: ‘It was a terrorist attack’
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said …
Read more…
Rice comments on Libya draw scrutiny
As more senior administration offici…
Read more…

Read more: http://times247.com/#ixzz27lnHaXn4

Decision Time by Yoel Meltzer

Ynet – http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4285909,00.html My blog – http://yoelmeltzer.com/decision-time/  With the Iranian issue coming to a head, it’s both ironic and a bit worrisome that the weight of the fateful decision is resting squarely on the soldiers of Benjamin Netanyahu. For despite his enormous potential – intelligent, charismatic, superb oratory skills, in-depth knowledge of economic issues – […]

Are Jewish Settlements Built on Arab Land? Posted By Rachel Neuwirth and John Landau ****

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/rachel-neuwirth-and-john-landau/are-jewish-settlements-built-on-arab-land/print/

Is it really true, as much of the European and American press have been reporting for years, that Jewish “settlers” in the “West Bank” (more properly known as Judea and Samaria) are living on land that they have stolen from Palestinian Arabs?

This is in fact utterly impossible. Every time that the Israeli government has proposed or given tentative approval for the construction of Jewish settlements in Judea and Samaria, it has first advertised its intentions in Arab newspapers, and invited any Arabs who have claims to the land to come forward with them. Only if no such claims were put forward for at least six months; or if, after such claims were made, the Israeli court system had ruled against them following a painstaking and thorough review of the facts, in which the courts bent over backwards to be fair to all Arab claimants, did the Israeli government actually authorize the construction of Jewish communities in this disputed area. Israeli courts have forbidden the Israel government from confiscating any Arab-owned land for Jewish settlement since 1980. And the Israel government has not authorized any new settlements since the Israeli-Palestinian “peace process” began in 1993.

Not even the so-called “unauthorized” or “illegal” Jewish settlements, those that the Israeli government has not fully and expressly authorized, are built on Arab-owned land. Both the authorized and unauthorized Jewish communities were all built on what had been completely unoccupied, uncultivated and uninhabited “waste land.” No Arab homes were destroyed, no Arab residents were expelled, and no Arab farmland was seized in creating any of these Jewish communities—whether their construction was fully authorized by the Israeli government or not. And under the land ownership laws of Judea and Samaria — which date to when these territories were under Turkish rule, and which have been respected by all subsequent governments, including the Israeli administration — nearly all uninhabited and completely undeveloped “waste land” belongs either to the state, not to any private owner. While such land could legally be purchased from the state, there were almost no instances in which Arabs actually did purchase such “waste land,” because they would have had to pay taxes on it while deriving no benefit for the foreseeable future. Whatever few purchases of such land were made, were made by Jewish philanthropists hoping to provide land for future Jewish refugees or immigrants.

P. DAVID HORNIK: NETANYAHU’S RED LINE

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/davidhornik/netanyahu%e2%80%99s-red-line/print/ At the start of Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s speech to the UN General Assembly on Thursday, he seemed less than fully focused, at times a little creaky in his delivery. The content of his words was unobjectionable. It had not been the easiest week for the Israeli Jewish people. The UN had picked […]

DAVID GOLDMAN: PALESTINIANS DITCHED….EGYPT NEXT?

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NI29Ak01.html “No one cares about the Palestinians,” I wrote in this space two years ago [1], and since then the world has stopped funding them. As a result, the Palestine Authority is collapsing, comments Khalid Elgindy, a former PA adviser, on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations, about “the wave of Palestinian protests […]

TORONTO SCHOOL BOARD’S DEPRAVED RECIPES FOR VEGETABLES…..WILLIAM BIGELOW BEYOND APPALLING!!!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/27/Toronto-School-Board-Encourages-Children-to-Use-Vegetables-for-Sex
If you think depraved school boards only exist in the United States, wait until you hear about Toronto, Canada’s. On the Toronto District School Board website there is a section that encourages children to not only experiment with sex toys but also instructs them to use vegetables for orgasmic pleasure.

Under the heading “Coalition for Positive Sexuality,” a link titled “Just Say Yes, pro sex” encourages kids to spice things up in the bedroom:

Most of us learn that our bodies, and our sex, are things to be ashamed of. Most of us learn that sex means a man on top of a woman, and that the only other choice is abstinence. But sex can be lots of things… women have sex with women, men have sex with men, women have sex with men — and sometimes the best sex is with yourself! There are lots of safe and fun ways to get off, which you probably won’t learn in school… don’t feel like you have to do everything on this page, but don’t feel like anything is automatically off limits either.

The link continues that a person could “could suck, kiss, touch, bite, fondle, nibble, squeeze and lick someone’s body, nipples, calves, toes, neck” and other areas. In addition, it mentions masturbation in front of the mirror, acting out fantasies and using sex toys.

AFGHAN CANADIAN STABS DAUGHTER FOR “HER OWN GOOD” GRAEME HAMILTON

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/09/26/its-for-your-good-let-me-finish-afghan-canadian-told-police-she-stabbed-daughter-with-kitchen-knife/ SHARIA FORM OF A “TIME OUT”??? RSK ‘It’s for your good. Let me finish’: Afghan-Canadian mother told police she stabbed her daughter with a kitchen knife MONTREAL – For months, Bahar Ebrahimi had been rebelling against her parents, complaining their Afghan culture and Muslim religion were suffocating her. “I want to enjoy my life. […]

ANDREW BOSTOM: NUPTIAL LAW IN EGYPT? SANCTIONING MARRAIGE TO NINE YEAR OLD GIRLS?!!!

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2012/09/28/muhammads-nuptial-example-in-to-be-law-egypt-constitution-writers-discuss-sanctioning-marriage-of-nine-year-old-girls/ Muhammad’s Nuptial Example in To Be Law Egypt?—Constitution Writers Discuss Sanctioning Marriage of Nine-Year-Old Girls Muhammad depicted in a prominent frieze which adorns the U.S. Supreme Court Building, despite the efforts [2] of the jihadist Muslim Brotherhood offshoot [3] Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) to have the sculpture removed in accord with Sharia […]