ELI HERTZ: THE ARAB LEAGUE AT WAR WITH ISRAEL

The Arab League at War with Israel | Eli E. Hertz

http://www.mythsandfacts.com/

According to media reports, on July 11, 2011 President Obama invited the other
members of the Quartet – Russia, the UN, and the EU – as well as representatives
from China and the Arab League,[1] to the White House for a summit on Israel.
Israel was not invited, but the Arab League was. It seems that the U.S. Administration is convinced that the Arab League can contribute to the deliberations.

So, who is the Arab League?

It is illuminating to examine the record of the League of Arab States since
the founding of the League in 1945, which is hardly a model for peaceful settlement of disputes in the spirit of the United Nations.

Prior to the establishment of the Jewish state, the League took the following
steps:[2]

• In December 1945, the Arab League launched a boycott of ‘Zionist goods’ that
continues to this day.[3]
• In June 1946, it established the Higher Arab Committee to “coordinate efforts
with regard to Palestine,” a radical body that led and coordinated attempts
to wipe Israel off the map.[4]
• In December 1946, it rejected the first proposed Palestine partition plans,
reaffirming “that Palestine is a part of the Arab motherland.”[5]
• In October 1947, prior to the vote on Resolution 181 – the “Partition Plan”
– it reasserted the necessity for military preparations along Arab borders
to “defending Palestine.”[6]
• In February 1948, it approved “a plan for political, military, and economic
measures to be taken in response to the Palestine crisis.”[7]
• In October 1948, it rejected the UN “Partition Plan” for Palestine adopted
by the General Assembly in Resolution 181.[8]

On May 15 1948, as the regular forces of Egypt, Trans-Jordan, Syria, Lebanon,
Iraq, and contingents from Saudi Arabia and Yemen invaded Israel to ‘restore
law and order,’ the Arab League issued a lengthy document entitled “Declaration
on the Invasion of Palestine.” In it, the Arab states drew attention to:

“The injustice implied in this solution [affecting] the right of the people
of Palestine to immediate independence … declared the Arabs’ rejection of
[Resolution 181]” which the League said “would not be possible to carry it
out by peaceful means, and that its forcible imposition would constitute a
threat to peace and security in this area” and claimed that the “security and
order in Palestine have become disrupted” due to the “aggressive intentions,
and the imperialistic designs of the Zionists” and “the Governments of the
Arab States, as members of the Arab League, a regional organization … view
the events taking place in Palestine as a threat to peace and security in the
area as a whole. … Therefore, as security in Palestine is a sacred trust
in the hands of the Arab States, and in order to put an end to this state of
affairs … the Governments of the Arab States have found themselves compelled
to intervene in Palestine.” [9]

The Secretary-General of the Arab League, Azzam Pasha, was less diplomatic
and far more candid, with no patience for polite or veiled language. At a Cairo
press conference on the same day that Israel declared its independence on May
14 1948, Pasha revealed the following statement which was reported the next
day in The New York Times. Pasha repeated the Arabs’ “intervention to restore
law and order”

“This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be
spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades.” The League of Arab
States continued to oppose peace after Israel’s 1948 War of Independence:

• In July 15 1948, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution 54 calling on
Arab aggression to stop:

“Taking into consideration that the Provisional Government of Israel has indicated
its acceptance in principle of a prolongation of the truce in Palestine; that
the States members of the Arab League have rejected successive appeals of the
United Nations Mediator, and of the Security Council in its resolution 53 (1948)
of 7 July 1948, for the prolongation of the truce in Palestine; and that there
has consequently developed a renewal of hostilities in Palestine.”[10]

• In October 1949, the Arab League declared that negotiation with Israel by
any Arab state would be in violation of Article 18 of the Arab League.[11]
• In April 1950, it called for severance of relations with any Arab state which
engaged in relations or contacts with Israel and prohibited Member states from
negotiating unilateral peace with Israel.[12]
• In March 1979, it suspended Egypt’s membership in the League (retroactively)
from the date of its signing a peace treaty with Israel.[13]

More recently, in the Beirut Declaration of March 27-28, 2002, adopted at the
height of Palestinian suicide attacks in Israel, the Arab League declared:

“We, the kings, presidents, and emirs of the Arab states meeting in the Council
of the Arab League Summit in Beirut, capital of Lebanon … have conducted
a thorough assessment of the developments and challenges … relating to the
Arab region and, more specifically, to the occupied Palestinian territory.
With great pride, we followed the Palestinian people’s intifada and valiant
resistance. … We address a greeting of pride and honour to the Palestinian
people’s steadfastness and valiant intifada against the Israeli occupation
and its destructive war machine. We greet with honour and pride the valiant
martyrs of the intifada.”[14]

The Arab League, which has systematically opposed and blocked peace efforts
for nearly 67 years, and is in a declared state-of-war with Israel, is now
deemed by the U.S. State Department an organization that can contribute to
peace in the Middle East.

This document uses extensive links via the Internet. If you experience a broken
link, please note the 5 digit number (xxxxx) at the end of the URL and use
it as a Keyword in the Search Box at www.MEfacts.com.
[1]www.arab.de/arabinfo/league.htm
[2] Listing of the Arab League sessions covering the League sessions between
June 4 1945 to November 17 1957 can be found at: http://faculty.winthrop.edu/haynese/mlas/ALSessions.html.
(11358)
[3] Session: 2, Cairo, Egypt. Resolution 16 (December 16 1945), “The Boycott
of Zionist Goods and Products” (Khalil, 2:161) – plans made to establish a
committee to enforce the boycott. (11358)
[4] Session 4, Bludan, Syria, Resolution 82 (June 12 1946), “The Higher Arab
Executive Committee” (Khalil, 2:162) – Establish the body to coordinate efforts
with regard to Palestine. (11358)
[5] Ibid.
[6] Session: 7, Cairo, Egypt, Resolution 181 (October 9 1947), “Defending Palestine”
(Khalil, 2:164-65) – Reassertion of the necessity for military preparations
along Arab borders. (11358)
[7] 18 Session: 8, Cairo, Egypt, February 1948, Council approved plan for political,
military, and economic measures to be taken in response to the Palestine crisis,
including withholding petroleum concessions and other possible sanctions against
countries aiding the Zionists. (11358)
[8] Session: 9, Cairo, Egypt, October 1948, rejection of partition plan for
Palestine. (11358)
[9]For the full text of the Arab League declaration on the invasion of Palestine
– 15 May 1948, see Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs at:www.mefacts.com/cache/html/wallruling_/11359.htm.
(11359)
[10] UN Security Council S/RES/54 (1948), July 15 1948, at: http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/2e2bcb7cbafd9b70852560c2005b5eec?OpenDocument.
(10894)
[11] Session: 11, Resolution 250, October 1949, Cairo, Egypt, Declared that
any member State negotiating with Israel would be in violation of Article 18
of the Arab League Pact. (11358)
[12] Session: 12, Resolution 312 (April 13 1950) Called for severance of relations
with any Arab State, which engaged in relations or contacts with Israel. (11358)

[13] Session: 70, March 1979, Bagdad, Iraq, Resolution to recommend severance
of political and diplomatic relations with Egypt. (11358)
[14] For excerpts from the text, posted in English translation on the Arab
portal al-bab (‘Gateway’), see: www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/communique02.htm.
(11360)

Comments are closed.